11 Katalon alternatives

11 Katalon alternatives

31 January 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In the dynamic world of software development, Quality Assurance (QA) professionals and developers are continually seeking robust tools to streamline their testing processes. When the preferred tool, Katalon, falls short of expectations or specific project requirements, the quest for an alternative can become a challenging endeavor.


Table of contents

This article is tailored for those on the lookout for a Katalon substitute, whether due to its discontinuation or the pursuit of different features.

We understand the difficulties of navigating the crowded market of automation tools, which is why we’ve curated a list of 11 Katalon alternatives. Each of these tools offers unique capabilities that cater to various testing needs. From the now-discontinued TestComplete to the innovative no-code platforms like Sofy and testRigor, we delve into a range of solutions that promise to enhance your testing workflows. Whether you’re interested in AI-powered platforms such as Applitools or seeking the physical touch of robotic testing with Mobot, our comprehensive guide is designed to simplify your search. Join us as we explore these alternatives, their standout features, and how they can potentially fit into your software testing arsenal.


Latest update: 1/8/2024, 3:21:03 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.


Alternatives to Katalon

Below is a comparison table that highlights the key differences in pricing, pros and cons, and other relevant features of the listed products. This table is designed to provide a concise overview to help you quickly identify which product may best suit your needs.

Product nameShort descriptionPlatformsProsConsEase of usePricing summaryFree planSimilarity Score
RepeatoMobile test automation tool without coding skills.Android, iOSIntuitive interface, stable, supports various testing methods.Limited iOS support, enterprise-level CI/CD tools access.Very easyFree plan available, Pro plan at €120/user/month.✔9.64
ACCELQAI-driven codeless test automation platform.Web, Android, iOSEfficiency, self-healing, improved test coverage.Java integration, desktop UI issues, learning curve.Very easyEnterprise plan customizable, trial available.–9
ApplitoolsAI-powered platform using Visual AI for software testing.Web, Android, iOSEasy to use, supports cross-browser testing, visual regression testing.Sluggish on slow connections, high cost for many accounts.EasyStarter plan with limitations, Eyes plan for enterprises.✔8.67
WaldoTest automation platform for mobile apps.Android, iOSReal user perspective testing, scalable technology.Frequent adaptation, learning curve.Very easyFree manual testing, automated plans available.✔8.36
MobotRobot-driven mobile QA solutions.Web, Android, iOSComprehensive testing, improves app quality.Not providedNot providedLive testing from $249/month, Managed from $1,999/month.–8.33
testRigorAI-based tool for writing tests in plain English.Web, Android, iOSPlain English tests, integration with tools.Occasional crashes, cost of server resources.Very easyFree plan for open source, Private plan from $900/month.✔8.25
BitbarCloud-based platform for web and mobile app testing.Web, Android, iOSCross-browser support, user-friendly interface.IE compatibility issues, inconsistent support.EasyLive Testing at $39/month, Unlimited at $177/month.–7.69
Ranorex StudioAutomated UI testing for mobile, web, and desktop apps.Web, Android, iOSStable scripts, Ranorex Spy tool, cross-browser support.Supports only C#, high cost, persistent bugs.EasyCustom pricing, contact sales for details.–7.5
LeapworkNo-code automation platform for various applications.Web, Android, iOSReusable components, visual language, extensive support.UI issues, limited mobile automation, slow test execution.Very easyCustom pricing, contact for a quote.–7.4
SofyNo-code mobile app testing with AI-powered automation.Android, iOSResponsive support, strong mobile testing, API requests.Limited web testing features, speed concerns.Very easyStarter at $549/month, Pro at $1499/month.–6.5
Sauce LabsMobile testing tools with real device cloud and monitoring.Web, Android, iOSIntuitive UI, cross-browser support, parallel execution.High cost, slow support response, server errors.EasyLive Testing at $39/month, Real Device Cloud at $199/month.–6.5
TestComplete(Discontinued) Automated UI functional testing tool.Web, Android, iOSAI-powered object recognition, scriptless options.Discontinued in 2023.EasyNot available–6.25

This table juxtaposes the products based on various criteria, such as platform compatibility, unique advantages, potential drawbacks, user-friendliness, and pricing structures. It also indicates whether a free plan is available and provides a similarity score, which may reflect how closely the product aligns with common requirements in the industry. Keep in mind that some products may not have provided complete information on all aspects, which is indicated accordingly.


A closer look at the 11 Katalon alternatives:

Repeato

Mobile test automation has become a cornerstone of quality assurance in the age of ubiquitous mobile apps, and choosing the right tool is crucial for efficient and effective testing. Repeato and Katalon are two notable options in this domain, each with distinctive approaches. Here, we focus on Repeato and highlight its key differences from Katalon.

Repeato: No-Code, User-Friendly Test Automation

Repeato is tailored for those who seek a no-code, straightforward solution for mobile test automation. Its intuitive test creation process, coupled with the ability to test on physical devices, sets it apart for users without coding expertise.

Key Distinctions:

  • Ease of Learning: Repeato emphasizes a “very easy to learn” approach, ideal for non-programmers and those looking to automate tests with minimal learning curve.
  • Mobile-First: Unlike Katalon, which supports web, Android, and iOS platforms, Repeato is exclusively focused on mobile testing for Android and iOS, ensuring specialized tooling for mobile environments.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: While both tools offer free plans, Repeato prides itself on being particularly cost-effective for automating and maintaining tests, aiming to save resources for teams.
  • Setup Simplicity: Setting up Repeato is noted for its quickness and simplicity, contrasting with Katalon that requires a moderate level of technical know-how.
  • Framework Support: Repeato offers broad framework support for mobile development environments such as Flutter, React Native, and Xamarin, which may be particularly relevant for teams working with these technologies.

Practical Differences:

  • No-Code vs. Low-Code: Repeato is a no-code platform, which stands in contrast to Katalon’s balance of low-code and full-code capabilities.
  • AI and Computer Vision: Both tools utilize AI and computer vision, but Repeato specifically leverages these technologies for its no-code UI testing, streamlining the test creation process.
  • CI/CD Integration: Repeato integrates with CI/CD pipelines, making it competitive with Katalon’s similar offerings, but with a focus on ease of use for less technical users.

User Feedback:

Users have praised Repeato for its simple interface, stability, and customer support. It allows for efficient script creation and maintenance, with a focus on mobile applications.

Conclusion

For QA professionals and developers looking for a mobile test automation tool, Repeato provides a no-code, efficient alternative to Katalon, particularly for those prioritizing ease of use and speed in setting up and maintaining tests. Its focus on mobile app testing and the ability to cater to non-technical users makes it a compelling choice in the realm of mobile test automation tools.

Pros and cons of Repeato

Pros of Repeato

  1. Simple and intuitive interface
  2. Easy setup process, no complex configurations needed
  3. Accessibility for both developers and non-programmers
  4. Supports various testing methods like clicks, drags and scripting
  5. Exceptional stability, no crashes or driver issues
  6. Regular updates with bug fixes and excellent customer support
  7. Great for mobile app testing, with efficient script creation
  8. Allows for hundreds of additional tests each day
  9. User-friendly, with easy adaptation and no initial setup required
  10. Recognizes elements using visual fingerprints for testing
  11. Allows for reusability and easy maintenance of scripts
  12. No prior training or complex coding skills needed

Cons of Repeato

  1. Some limitations for iOS applications when tapping on any system window outside of the app
  2. Access to CI/CD tools is only available at the enterprise level
  3. Occasional unknown errors while performing basic tasks, although they are quickly remedied in the next version.

More relevant posts:


Accelq

When assessing test automation tools, ACCELQ and Katalon both provide cutting-edge features for QA professionals and developers. Here we highlight the key differences to aid decision-making.

Codeless Automation Focus

  • ACCELQ is entirely codeless, positioning itself as extremely user-friendly for non-technical testers.
  • Katalon offers a mix of low-code and full-code capabilities, catering to a wider range of technical expertise.

AI-Driven Capabilities

  • Both platforms leverage AI to enhance testing, but ACCELQ emphasizes its AI-driven codeless automation and self-healing features.

Test Environment and Types

  • ACCELQ facilitates testing across Web, Mobile, API, Desktop, and Backend systems in a unified manner.
  • Katalon provides a comprehensive testing platform with a focus on flexibility and scalability, including a separate environment for on-demand testing via Katalon TestCloud.

Integration and Collaboration

  • ACCELQ integrates with tools like Jira and AzureDevOps, enhancing cross-functional collaboration among different roles within a team.
  • Katalon also offers robust integrations and aims to provide real-time visibility into the testing process through Katalon TestOps.

Salesforce Automation and Industry Solutions

  • ACCELQ stands out with specialized solutions for Salesforce automation and caters to a diverse range of industries with tailored approaches.

Pricing and Accessibility

  • Katalon extends a free plan, making it more accessible for small teams or individuals starting with test automation.
  • ACCELQ does not offer a free tier, which may influence the decision of cost-conscious users or smaller teams.

Educational Resources and Community Support

  • Both platforms offer extensive learning resources; however, ACCELQ features a Q Academy for users to master its specific platform capabilities.

Product Offerings

  • ACCELQ’s suite includes specialized products for Automated Web, API, Mobile, and a unified AI-based platform.
  • Katalon emphasizes ease of use, innovation, and affordability across its suite of tools.

In summary, while both ACCELQ and Katalon serve the same market of QA automation, ACCELQ prioritizes a no-code, AI-powered approach with a strong focus on business process assurance and Salesforce automation. Meanwhile, Katalon offers a balance between low-code and full-code solutions with a free entry-level plan. The choice between the two may hinge on specific organizational needs, budget constraints, and the technical proficiency of the testing team.

Pros and cons of Accelq

Pros

  1. Efficiency and Speed: ACCELQ offers a streamlined testing process that enhances overall efficiency and speed.
  2. Self-Healing Capabilities: The tool has self-healing features that help maintain test accuracy over time.
  3. Improved Test Coverage: Users report that ACCELQ helps in achieving more comprehensive test coverage.
  4. Object Repository: A centralized object repository aids in better test management and reusability.
  5. Defined Framework: ACCELQ comes with a predefined framework that reduces setup time and effort.
  6. Logging Features: Detailed logging capabilities are available for better tracking and debugging of tests.
  7. Defined Methods: The tool provides predefined methods that can be used to streamline test creation.
  8. Salesforce Automation: It is particularly strong in automating tests for Salesforce applications.
  9. Easy Maintenance: Maintenance of tests is easier due to the tool’s design and features.
  10. Accelerated Development: Advanced AI capabilities in ACCELQ support faster development of test cases.

Cons

  1. Java Integration: The need for an in-built editor for Java integrations to custom methods is an area for improvement.
  2. Desktop UI Issues: Some users encounter issues with the Desktop UI, although alternatives like CLI are available.
  3. Grid Filters: There is a need for enhancements in Grid Filters to support custom and diverse filter items.
  4. Data Warehouse Integration: For those dealing with heterogeneous data sources, there may be challenges without a centralized data warehouse.
  5. ETL Testing Limitations: While ACCELQ simplifies ETL testing, there may be complexities when dealing with varied data transformations and compliance standards.
  6. Learning Curve: New users might experience a learning curve due to the advanced features and AI capabilities.
  7. Cost: The pricing model may be a consideration for smaller teams or individual users.
  8. Limited Language Support: Users who prefer programming languages other than Java may find limited support.
  9. Customization Limits: Some users may require more customization options than what is currently available.
  10. Documentation and Support: While not always the case, some users might seek more comprehensive documentation and support for complex scenarios.

More relevant posts:


Applitools

When it comes to selecting a test automation tool, QA professionals and developers need to weigh their options carefully. Applitools and Katalon both offer powerful AI-augmented testing capabilities, yet they serve different needs within the software testing landscape.

Applitools: Emphasizing Visual AI for Test Automation

Applitools is an AI-powered test automation platform that focuses on visual testing. It employs Visual AI to optimize test creation, execution, analysis, and maintenance. Here are some key differentiators when compared to Katalon:

  • Ultrafast Test Cloud: Applitools provides a cross-browser testing platform that delivers fast and accurate results across various environments, which is not explicitly highlighted in Katalon’s offering.
  • Visual AI Core: Applitools uses Visual AI to validate every element of the UI, including text, images, and layouts, ensuring comprehensive coverage that extends beyond Katalon’s AI capabilities.
  • Preflight: This no-code solution within Applitools streamlines test creation and maintenance, whereas Katalon offers a balance of low-code and full-code options.
  • Auto-Maintenance: Applitools simplifies test maintenance by automatically updating tests, a feature that contrasts with Katalon’s separate licensing for advanced features like CI/CD integration and Visual Testing.
  • Accessibility Testing: Applitools includes visual accessibility testing tools, which is not a primary focus of Katalon’s platform.

How Applitools Stands Apart from Katalon

While both platforms offer robust testing solutions, here are the distinctive aspects of Applitools that set it apart:

  • Efficiency and Speed: Applitools’ Visual AI and Ultrafast Grid contribute to a significant reduction in test creation and maintenance time, which may not be matched by Katalon’s current capabilities.
  • Self-Healing Infrastructure: The Execution Cloud in Applitools offers a self-healing test infrastructure, enhancing the resilience of tests. Katalon’s self-healing capabilities are more focused on smart wait scheduling and dynamic test suites.
  • Visual AI Validation: Applitools Eyes, the Visual AI validation engine, is unique in its large-scale UI testing automation, which goes beyond Katalon’s visual testing features.
  • Integration with Existing Tools: Applitools boasts extensive integration with popular testing frameworks and tools like Selenium and Cypress, while Katalon also integrates well but emphasizes its all-in-one platform approach.
  • Diverse SDKs: Applitools offers multiple SDKs for creating and comparing visual snapshots, which may provide more flexibility compared to Katalon’s unified platform for different types of testing.

For QA teams and developers seeking a specialized tool in AI-powered visual testing with a focus on efficiency and integration, Applitools is a strong contender. However, it’s important to consider the specific needs of your testing processes, existing workflows, and the scale at which you operate to determine the best fit between Applitools and Katalon.

Pros and cons of Applitools

Pros

  1. Easy to use and implement into existing automation workflows.
  2. Customer-focused support and assistance.
  3. Facilitates the detection of unintended changes, especially in large applications.
  4. Shallow learning curve, making it accessible for QA teams with less coding experience.
  5. Enhances cross-browser and cross-device testing capabilities.
  6. Visual regression testing moves beyond simple visibility checks to ensure visual perfection.
  7. Integration with popular frameworks like Cypress for immediate feedback on changes.
  8. Offers multiple SDKs for ease of creating and comparing visual snapshots.
  9. Features like self-healing capabilities for cloud runners improve user experience.
  10. Supports visual validation for accessibility and early component validation in the delivery cycle.

Cons

  1. The platform can be sluggish on slower connections or computers.
  2. Initial maintenance and setup may require some time to get used to.
  3. Error reporting can be problematic for automated report generation.
  4. Snapshot quality issues have been observed, although updates have addressed them.
  5. Lack of built-in support for Azure DevOps Server on pipelines (though now available and updated).
  6. Misuse of the tool due to a lack of understanding of its collaborative potential.
  7. Branch and baseline management can be confusing, especially for non-technical team members.
  8. The cost of Applitools can be prohibitive, especially for large companies requiring many accounts.
  9. The GUI, while user-friendly, may oversimplify for advanced users or specific use cases.
  10. While the tool is mature and comprehensive, its powerful features come with a high price tag.


Waldo

Waldo and Katalon serve as tools for software testing, each with its own set of features and focus areas. For QA professionals and developers seeking a suitable testing solution, understanding the key differences between Waldo and Katalon is crucial.

No-Code Approach

Both Waldo and Katalon offer no-code test automation capabilities. However, Waldo is distinctive in its user-friendly approach that is highly accessible to non-technical team members. Katalon provides a balance between low-code and full-code capabilities, which can accommodate users with varying levels of expertise.

AI-Augmentation

Katalon integrates AI-powered features such as self-healing tests and smart wait scheduling to enhance test reliability and efficiency. Waldo does not emphasize AI-augmented testing as part of its core features.

Supported Platforms

Katalon offers a comprehensive platform that supports web, mobile, API, and desktop testing, whereas Waldo focuses exclusively on mobile applications for Android and iOS.

Ease of Use

Waldo is highlighted for its very easy learning curve, allowing quick adoption even by those with minimal testing experience. Katalon is also user-friendly but caters to a broader spectrum of technical abilities, including options for more advanced users.

Testing Capabilities

Waldo streamlines the mobile app testing process with a clear focus on simplicity and efficiency in creating and running tests. Katalon, on the other hand, provides a broader range of testing solutions that can be scaled and customized to meet various needs.

Integration and Support

While both platforms offer support for continuous integration (CI) tools, Katalon provides a wider array of native integrations within its suite, potentially offering a more seamless experience for teams with existing DevOps ecosystems.

Customer Support and Community

Both platforms provide customer support, with Katalon also boasting a strong community backing, which can be a valuable resource for troubleshooting and learning.

In essence, Waldo is tailored for teams looking for a straightforward, no-code mobile test automation tool that is easy to adopt, whereas Katalon serves as a more versatile quality management platform with AI features and extensive testing capabilities across different types of applications.

Pros and cons of Waldo

Pros

  1. Tests from a real user’s perspective, making it less sensitive to UI changes.
  2. Finds elements even if they change position, ID, or size, leading to more successful test completions.
  3. Assertion feature alerts when changes are detected that may need review.
  4. Includes a flakiness score to identify and improve flaky tests.
  5. Advanced features like deep linking and branch testing enhance testing capabilities.
  6. Contributes to faster and more efficient development cycles by catching bugs earlier.
  7. Allows for confidence in releasing new updates without full manual regression.
  8. Scalable and reliable technology that mimics real user interactions.
  9. Excellent customer support with proactive outreach and dedicated communication channels.
  10. Reduces manual testing time significantly, allowing for faster feedback loops and quicker bug fixes.

Cons

  1. Continuous evolution of the product can require frequent adaptation of testing methods.
  2. Some users experience slower execution speed of test suites.
  3. Edge cases may be challenging to automate with the current toolset.
  4. No-code approach may lead to updating tests only after new code breaks them.
  5. Learning curve associated with adopting new developer tools like Waldo.
  6. Can’t automate 100% of tests, as certain scenarios may still require manual attention.
  7. End-to-end tests, particularly on mobile, can be inherently slow.
  8. Dependency on the tool’s updates and improvements for better performance.
  9. Some initial setup and familiarization with the technology are necessary.
  10. May not be as intuitive for teams accustomed to traditional code-first testing approaches.


Mobot

Mobot: Automated Mobile QA Solutions

Mobot provides a unique approach to mobile application testing, employing real robots to simulate human interaction with mobile devices. This innovative method ensures comprehensive test coverage, including complex scenarios that are typically challenging to automate. Mobot’s services are split into three main offerings:

Mobot Offerings

Mobot Live

  • Target Audience: QA Teams
  • Functionality: Self-service testing platform with robot-assisted automation
  • Device Coverage: Access to over 300 iOS and Android devices
  • Features: Automated recording, screenshotting, and live robot camera feed

Mobot Managed

  • Target Audience: Engineering Teams
  • Functionality: Fully-managed testing service
  • Benefits: 5x faster results than manual testing, 100% coverage
  • Unique Selling Point: Mechanical robots perform intricate app tests

Mobot Insights

  • Target Audience: Marketing Teams
  • Functionality: Campaign monitoring and reporting
  • Purpose: Identify revenue leaks from bugs, automated JIRA ticketing
  • Outcome: Detailed bug descriptions for swift resolution

Practical Applications

  • Marketing & Product: Rest assured that Mobot is actively monitoring campaign performance.
  • Engineering + QA: Strive for perfect testing coverage, leaving no feature untested.

The Mobot Difference

  • Robot-Powered QA: AI and ML-enhanced robots provide full test coverage, replacing manual QA efforts.
  • Complex Test Capabilities: Google Authentication, In-App Purchases, Biometric Security, and more.
  • Testimonials: Positive feedback from leading teams on app stability and QA efficiency.
  • Demo Invitation: Experience Mobot’s capabilities firsthand with a demo.

Contact and Additional Info

  • Location: New York, NY
  • Rights: © 2023 Team Mobot Inc.

Distinguishing Mobot from Katalon

While Katalon presents an AI-augmented software quality management platform ideal for a wide array of testing scenarios, Mobot specializes strictly in mobile app testing with physical robot interactions. Here are the key differences:

  • Testing Approach: Mobot uses real robots for hands-on QA versus Katalon’s AI-augmented virtual testing.
  • Service Model: Mobot offers fully-managed services tailored for specific team roles, whereas Katalon provides a broader range of self-service tools.
  • Pricing: Katalon has a free plan suitable for small teams; Mobot’s services start from a paid tier but offer a free trial.
  • Target Use Case: Mobot’s offerings are exclusively focused on mobile applications, providing a niche solution for those requiring physical device interaction.

By understanding these differences, QA professionals and developers can better evaluate which solution aligns with their mobile application testing needs.


Bitbar by Smartbear

BitBar is a versatile testing platform that emphasizes cloud-based solutions for web and mobile app testing. It is specifically designed to cater to the needs of QA professionals and developers who require access to real devices and browsers for accurate testing scenarios.

Key Differences from Katalon

  • Testing Environment: BitBar specializes in providing a vast selection of real mobile devices and browsers for testing, unlike Katalon which offers AI-augmented testing capabilities.
  • Device Farm: BitBar includes access to a device farm, ensuring tests run on actual hardware, a feature not directly provided by Katalon.
  • Ease of Maintenance: With BitBar, there is no need for lab maintenance, as the platform handles setup and device management, whereas Katalon focuses on ease of use with features like record-and-playback.
  • Deployment: BitBar offers public and private cloud options, catering to various security and infrastructure needs. Katalon provides on-premise solutions, which BitBar does not.
  • AI and Computer Vision: Unlike Katalon, BitBar does not integrate AI or computer vision into its testing processes.
  • Framework and Language Support: BitBar supports an extensive range of testing frameworks and languages, ensuring compatibility with diverse testing methodologies.
  • Scalability: BitBar is designed to scale testing efforts by enabling parallel test execution across multiple devices and browsers.

Practical Implications

For QA teams and developers looking for a cloud-based solution with a focus on real device and browser testing, BitBar provides a scalable and maintenance-free option. The platform is especially beneficial for those who require extensive device coverage and seek to automate their testing in a secure, cloud-based environment. In contrast to Katalon, BitBar’s emphasis is on simplifying the testing process by offloading device management and offering a wide range of real testing environments, rather than AI-augmented features.

Pros and cons of Bitbar

Pros

  • Extensive support for cross-browser testing, allowing for quick identification of bugs.
  • Ability to take screenshots and record tests when a test case fails, enhancing the debugging process.
  • Offers a Record & Play feature which is highly valued by users.
  • User-friendly interface that supports a large number of browsers, making it easy to test across different environments.
  • Positive feedback on the tool’s reliability with no significant dislikes reported by some users.
  • Simplifies site updates and cross-browser compatibility checks for multiple clients.
  • Provides a wide range of systems and devices for testing purposes.
  • Enables efficient automation of testing across various devices and operating systems.
  • Cost-effective, with the tool’s efficiency offsetting the expense through time savings.
  • Effective dashboard that provides a quick and concise overview of testing status and results.

Cons

  • Occasionally, web applications fail to launch on Internet Explorer (IE 11), indicating compatibility issues.
  • Customer support experiences have been inconsistent, with some users finding it difficult to get clear answers and technical assistance.
  • Aggressive sales tactics have been reported, leading to a negative experience for some customers.
  • Pricing discrepancies and lack of clear communication regarding costs have been a concern, resulting in customer dissatisfaction.
  • The user experience (UX) could be improved, especially for beginners; suggestions include having different modes for novice and expert users.
  • The onboarding process, while praised for being quick and easy, could potentially be further optimized for new users.


Ranorex Studio

Ranorex Studio is a full-featured automation framework focused on enhancing the efficiency and accuracy of user interface testing across web, mobile, and desktop platforms. Its robust capabilities are designed to streamline the test automation process, making it suitable for both novices and seasoned professionals in software development and quality assurance.

Key Features and Advantages

  • Cross-Platform Testing: Construct test suites that operate seamlessly across multiple platforms, including iOS and Android.
  • Device Testing Versatility: Perform tests on a mix of real and emulated devices to ensure broad coverage.
  • Flexible Test Creation: Utilize recording, scripting, or a combination of both for creating detailed automated tests.
  • Advanced UI Interaction: Employ gestures like swipes and orientation changes to mimic user behavior.
  • Integrations: Embed tests into CI systems and connect with tools like Jira and Git for a unified workflow.
  • Data-Driven Approach: Link test cases to external data sources for comprehensive test scenarios.
  • Parallel Execution: Run tests concurrently on different devices to expedite the testing process.

Differences in Comparison to Katalon

  • No Free Plan: Unlike Katalon, Ranorex Studio does not offer a free tier, which might affect initial accessibility for some teams.
  • AI Capabilities: Ranorex Studio does not incorporate AI-based enhancements that Katalon provides, such as self-healing tests and smart wait.
  • Coding Options: While both platforms support codeless automation, Ranorex Studio emphasizes its robust scripting capabilities in C# and VB.NET.
  • Support for React Native: Ranorex has specialized support for React Native apps, ensuring compatibility and smoother testing processes.
  • Device Modification: Testing with Ranorex requires no device modification like jailbreaking or rooting, which might differ from Katalon’s approach.
  • User Interface Element Identification: Ranorex Studio uses RanoreXPath for UI element identification, which may provide a different level of robustness compared to Katalon’s object identification mechanisms.
  • Industry Recognition: Ranorex Studio boasts high customer satisfaction ratings and is recognized as a leader in the G2 Grid for Test Automation Software.

For QA professionals and developers looking for a capable and comprehensive tool to facilitate mobile testing, Ranorex Studio offers a rich set of features that prioritize UI testing and cross-platform compatibility. It is a powerful solution that integrates with existing development ecosystems, albeit without a free entry point like Katalon.

Pros and cons of Ranorex Studio

Pros

  1. Ranorex Spy tool is effective for identifying and locating XPath, providing an edge over some other automation tools.
  2. Enables creation of stable automation scripts that are less affected by updates compared to tools like Selenium.
  3. Powerful tool that can cover almost all types of desktop applications.
  4. Provides the flexibility to implement code using Ranorex API as well as within Ranorex Studio.
  5. Offers support for automation of web and mobile applications in addition to desktop apps.
  6. Ranorex can be cost-effective if the infrastructure and approach are optimized.
  7. Features easy click and recording capabilities for actions of the tested application.
  8. Provides a variety of free online training sessions for all experience levels and helpful support.
  9. Facilitates the transition from manual to automated testing, potentially increasing test coverage and efficiency.
  10. Simplifies test creation, especially for those with less programming knowledge, and supports cross-browser testing.

Cons

  1. Ranorex only supports C# and is limited to Windows, lacking support for Mac OS.
  2. Some users experience difficulties when recording actions on applications using multiple technologies.
  3. Some users report receiving no tangible benefits from using Ranorex in certain scenarios.
  4. The cost of Ranorex can be high, which may be a barrier for smaller teams or businesses.
  5. Users have reported experiencing persistent bugs and issues within the system over the years.
  6. Communication with support has been challenging for some users, with difficulties in resolving issues.
  7. Sales representative turnover can lead to inconsistencies in customer service.
  8. Reporting functionality in Ranorex is criticized for not scaling well with larger tests.
  9. While Ranorex is flexible, some users feel that this flexibility is necessary to work around its shortcomings.
  10. Compatibility with all desired technologies should be thoroughly tested, as some users have found limitations in Ranorex’s ability to interact with certain elements.


Leapwork

When choosing between Leapwork and Katalon for test automation, it’s crucial to understand their distinct features and offerings. Here’s a concise comparison to guide QA professionals and developers in making an informed decision.

Leapwork: A No-Code Test Automation Platform

Leapwork is designed for simplicity and user-friendliness, promoting a no-code approach to test automation. It enables users to automate tests across a variety of applications and technologies without deep coding knowledge. Key features include:

  • Visual Language and Smart Recorder for creating UI tests.
  • Reusable Components to streamline maintenance.
  • Hypervisual Debugging for quick issue resolution.
  • Support for Cross-Browser and Cross-Device testing.
  • Integration with CI/CD tools for continuous testing.

Leapwork is particularly suited to non-technical testers due to its visual workflow and ease of use. It offers robust support for enterprise applications like Dynamics 365, Salesforce, SAP, and mainframes, making it versatile across industries.

Distinguishing Leapwork from Katalon

While both Leapwork and Katalon utilize AI for test automation and provide no-code solutions, there are several differences:

  • Free Plan: Unlike Katalon, Leapwork does not offer a free plan, which may influence the decision for smaller teams or individual users exploring test automation options.
  • On-Premise Option: Katalon provides an on-premise solution, which could be a deciding factor for organizations with strict data governance or security requirements.
  • Computer Vision: Katalon incorporates computer vision technology, enhancing its capability to detect and interact with UI elements, which Leapwork does not explicitly mention.
  • Ease of Use: Leapwork is described as “very easy to learn,” suggesting a slightly more user-friendly interface compared to Katalon’s “easy to learn” characterization.
  • Device Farm: Katalon’s comparison table does not mention a device farm, which could be relevant for teams needing to test on a wide range of devices.
  • Scheduler: Katalon includes a scheduler feature, which may appeal to teams looking to automate their test runs at specific intervals or times.

Conclusion

Leapwork stands out for its visual, no-code approach and strong support for a variety of enterprise applications, making it accessible for non-technical users. In contrast, Katalon’s low-code to full-code spectrum, along with its free plan and on-premise option, offers flexibility and cost-effectiveness for a diverse user base. The choice between these platforms will depend on the specific needs of the organization, such as budget constraints, security policies, and the technical proficiency of the testing team.

Pros and cons of Leapwork

Pros

  1. Comprehensive data storage abilities without being locked into a single solution.
  2. Excellent support with timely solutions upon request.
  3. Ease of use in creating subflows for reusable tasks, which benefits non-technical testers.
  4. Enables manual testers to create automation without extensive coding knowledge.
  5. GUI-based platform that is easy to learn with a supportive knowledge base.
  6. No technical prerequisites required for use.
  7. In-depth strategy editor that supports web, desktop, and API automation.
  8. Seamless integration of test cases involving both desktop and web applications.
  9. Video export feature of executed test cases for documentation and training.
  10. Excellent debugging functionality, including live video execution and video recording.

Cons

  1. Minor user interface issues, such as watermarks not disappearing when typing.
  2. Lack of check-in control in the Platform version compared to the Enterprise version.
  3. Reporting features could be enhanced, such as email reports and dashboard improvements.
  4. Identifying some web elements can be counterintuitive and may require advanced knowledge.
  5. Mobile automation not built-in; reliance on third-party providers or tools is necessary.
  6. Test execution can be slow when using remote agents.
  7. Limited functionality for executing sub-flows compared to main flows.
  8. Data-driven test automation from Excel is not dynamic and could be improved.
  9. Limited Excel integration with only basic Read and Write blocks available.
  10. Still an on-premises tool; could benefit from being cloud-based with automated backups and disaster recovery.

More relevant posts:


Sofy

As QA professionals or developers in search of an efficient testing solution, understanding the differences between Sofy and Katalon can guide your decision-making process. Here’s a structured breakdown of how Sofy diverges from Katalon:

Platform Specialization

  • Sofy is tailored specifically for mobile app testing, providing a no-code solution with a focus on ease of use and real device testing.
  • Katalon serves a broader range of applications, including web, mobile, API, and desktop testing.

Testing Approach

  • Sofy emphasizes no-code automation across its platform, enabling those with minimal coding expertise to perform comprehensive testing.
  • Katalon offers a balance between low-code and full-code capabilities, catering to both non-developers and those who prefer to delve into code.

Device Testing

  • Sofy provides a Device Lab with access to real Android and iOS devices, which is a central feature of its offering.
  • Katalon does not highlight a device farm as part of its core features, focusing instead on scalable test environments through Katalon TestCloud.

AI Integration

  • Both platforms integrate AI features, but Sofy capitalizes on self-healing tests and scriptless test automation, aimed at reducing maintenance.
  • Katalon incorporates AI through features like smart wait scheduling and dynamic test suites.

User Experience

  • Sofy is described as very easy to learn, streamlining the onboarding process for new users.
  • Katalon is recognized for its ease of use, but with a slight learning curve due to its more extensive feature set.

Testing Capabilities

  • Sofy is strong in mobile testing, with capabilities like testing on real devices and Bluetooth connectivity.
  • Katalon provides comprehensive testing features that support UI, API, and Mobile within a unified platform.

Pricing Model

  • Sofy starts with a paid Starter Plan, reflecting its focus on providing a robust solution out of the box.
  • Katalon offers a free Starter Plan, making it more accessible for small teams or individuals beginning with automation testing.

By considering these differences, QA teams and developers can better ascertain which platform aligns with their specific testing requirements and operational preferences.

Pros and cons of Sofy

Pros

  • The support team is highly responsive and provides solid assistance.
  • Mobile testing capabilities are particularly strong.
  • Enables creation of test data and handling conditional logic through a record-and-play feature.
  • Integration with JIRA and CI/CD pipelines enhances workflow.
  • Facilitates rapid increase in test coverage.
  • The ability to make API requests within tests allows for more comprehensive testing scenarios.
  • Described as a user-friendly no-code solution, making it accessible for startups and non-developers.
  • Encourages best practices in test writing through collaboration with a technical account manager.
  • Supports testing on real devices and can connect to other devices via Bluetooth.
  • Actively listens to customer feedback and regularly introduces new, helpful features.

Cons

  • Some users may find the product’s capabilities limited for cutting-edge or unique test cases.
  • Web testing features are not as robust as mobile testing features.
  • Issues with JIRA integration have been reported.
  • The platform may require a learning curve and initial setup effort to integrate with existing CI flows.
  • Test execution speed has been reported as somewhat slow by some users.
  • Uses a minute-based pricing system, which may not suit all types of projects or budgets.
  • Some users find the overall pricing to be on the higher side.
  • Requires effort to automate test cases and connect physical devices via Bluetooth, despite the ease of use.
  • The product is still growing and may not have all the desired features yet.
  • Requires some technical effort to fully integrate test results with other continuous integration flows.


Sauce Labs

When it comes to choosing the right testing solution, QA professionals and developers are often faced with a challenging decision. Sauce Labs and Katalon are both prominent names in the testing landscape, each offering unique features and capabilities. Here’s a breakdown of how Sauce Labs stands out in comparison to Katalon:

Sauce Labs: A Mobile Testing Powerhouse

Sauce Labs offers a comprehensive suite for mobile app testing, ensuring applications work flawlessly across various devices and platforms. Its standout features include:

Real Device Cloud

  • Access to a vast array of iOS and Android devices for both automated and manual testing.
  • Unlike Katalon, which doesn’t offer a device farm, Sauce Labs provides extensive device coverage, crucial for testing app compatibility.

Emulators & Simulators

  • Early-stage testing is enhanced with emulators and simulators, integrating smoothly into CI/CD workflows.
  • Katalon also supports emulators and simulators, but Sauce Labs emphasizes this for early development stages.

Beta Testing & App Distribution

  • Sauce Labs streamlines beta testing with platforms that offer real-time video sessions and in-app bug reporting.
  • Katalon, while offering comprehensive testing tools, doesn’t specifically highlight beta testing and app distribution.

Error Monitoring & Reporting

  • Tools for identifying, prioritizing, and resolving application errors offer detailed analytics.
  • Katalon provides similar features, but Sauce Labs places a strong emphasis on error monitoring within mobile app testing.

Customer Experiences & Economic Impact

  • Sauce Labs boasts positive feedback for its parallelized testing and managed device services, showcasing its productivity benefits.
  • Katalon has a different focus, with AI-augmented capabilities and learning resources.

Test Automation Frameworks

  • Supports popular test automation frameworks, facilitating a smooth transition for teams with existing testing processes.
  • Katalon also supports various frameworks, but Sauce Labs makes it easy for teams to leverage their current tools.

Key Differences to Katalon

  • Free Plan: Katalon offers a free plan, while Sauce Labs does not, potentially making Katalon more accessible for smaller teams or individual developers.
  • On-Premise Deployment: Katalon provides an on-premise option, which is not available with Sauce Labs, catering to teams with specific security or infrastructure requirements.
  • AI-Augmented Capabilities: Katalon integrates AI features, such as self-healing tests, which are not highlighted by Sauce Labs.
  • Ease of Use and Learning Resources: Katalon is known for its ease of use and extensive resources, including an academy and community forums, which are particularly beneficial for teams scaling their testing efforts or transitioning from manual to automated testing.

In summary, while both platforms serve web, Android, and iOS testing with no-code options, Sauce Labs is particularly strong in mobile testing with its real device cloud and monitoring features. Katalon, on the other hand, may appeal to teams looking for AI-augmented testing capabilities, on-premise deployment, and a free starting plan. Your choice should align with your specific testing requirements, team size, and budget considerations.

Pros and cons of Sauce Labs

Pros

  1. Easy to integrate with existing codebases, enhancing the adaptability for teams.
  2. Offers a high degree of versatility for testing across different browsers, devices, and platforms.
  3. Provides an intuitive user interface that is frequently updated based on user feedback.
  4. Regularly introduces new features and improvements to the service.
  5. Boasts a supportive community for troubleshooting and user assistance.
  6. Enables effective cross-browser and cross-platform testing without complex setups.
  7. Supports the latest web browsers and mobile operating systems for both forward and backward compatibility testing.
  8. Facilitates parallel execution, allowing numerous instances to run simultaneously, which significantly reduces test suite execution time.
  9. Features video recordings of tests to help identify where failures occur.
  10. Includes a platform configurator to assist in running test suites on real mobile applications.

Cons

  1. The cost can be high due to the reliance on virtual machines.
  2. Users may occasionally encounter server errors.
  3. Customer support response times can be slow.
  4. Frequent changes in account managers can disrupt service continuity.
  5. Lacks an option to export test reports in formats such as TestNG, Cucumber, and Extent directly from Sauce Labs.
  6. The process of copying usernames and passwords from the profile can be cumbersome.
  7. Errors during testing can occur, requiring users to rely on video features for debugging.
  8. Does not provide email triage for report notifications of test suites.
  9. Running real mobile device tests with the same web browser suite can present challenges.
  10. The time taken for script execution can be a concern for some users.

More relevant posts:


TestComplete by Smartbear

As QA professionals and developers seek efficient and reliable automated testing solutions, understanding the subtle and not-so-subtle differences between available tools is crucial. While TestComplete was a robust option, its discontinuation in mid-2023 has left many searching for alternatives. Katalon, on the other hand, continues to be a strong contender in the market, offering a suite of features that cater to a wide audience.

Here’s a breakdown of the main differences between TestComplete and Katalon:

  • AI Capabilities: Both TestComplete and Katalon incorporated AI features to enhance testing. However, with TestComplete’s discontinuation, Katalon’s ongoing AI innovations like self-healing tests and smart wait scheduling remain a significant advantage.

  • Ease of Use: Katalon provides a balance between low-code and full-code capabilities, appealing to both novice and experienced testers. TestComplete also supported scriptless test creation, but as it is no longer available, Katalon stands out for its user-friendly approach.

  • Platform Support: Katalon continues to support testing across web, mobile, API, and desktop applications, ensuring a unified experience for testers. TestComplete had similar offerings but is no longer an option for teams seeking long-term support.

  • Scalability: Katalon emphasizes scalability with its on-demand test environments and TestCloud, making it a suitable choice for growing teams. TestComplete’s platform was also scalable, but current and future scalability is now a moot point.

  • Community and Support: Katalon offers a robust community forum, detailed documentation, and dedicated technical support. With TestComplete’s discontinuation, new and existing users of the tool will need to look elsewhere for community engagement and support.

  • Pricing and ROI: Katalon’s flexible pricing models are designed to provide a high return on investment, with a free trial available for new users. TestComplete’s pricing is now irrelevant, but Katalon’s structure aims to accommodate a range of budgets and team sizes.

  • Continuous Development: Katalon continues to develop and introduce new features, keeping pace with the evolving needs of software testing. With TestComplete no longer in development, users must consider how a tool like Katalon can future-proof their testing processes.

In conclusion, while TestComplete served many users well during its time, Katalon stands as a comprehensive and evolving alternative with a strong focus on AI-augmented testing, ease of use, scalability, and community support. As the landscape of software testing tools changes, it is essential to consider these factors in selecting a tool that aligns with your team’s needs and ensures continuity in your testing efforts.


Conclusion

In conclusion, while there are numerous Katalon Studio alternatives available, each offering unique strengths and features tailored to specific testing needs, Repeato stands out as a user-friendly, no-code mobile app testing solution. Repeato’s platform is designed with a focus on simplicity and accessibility, making it ideal for both technical and non-technical users. Its intuitive interface, combined with real device testing and pixel-perfect assertions, ensures that high-quality user experiences are delivered across diverse devices and operating systems.

For teams considering a shift from Katalon Studio or looking to complement their existing tools, Repeato offers a cost-effective and efficient approach to UI testing for iOS and Android platforms. Its integration with CI/CD pipelines and emphasis on test maintenance simplification further position it as a practical choice for modern development workflows.

To explore more about testing automation and best practices, consider reading our articles on test debt, low-code test automation, and mobile app testing checklists. Additionally, for insights into specific challenges and solutions in mobile test automation, our articles on real device testing and comparison of cross-platform mobile test automation tools provide valuable guidance.

Choosing the right testing tool is pivotal to achieving efficiency and effectiveness in your QA process. Repeato offers a seamless and streamlined experience for mobile app testing, which is worth considering as part of your testing strategy.

Check it out!

Like this article? there’s more where that came from!

Repeato

Documentation

Support

Legal

Repeato Reviews