18 January 2024 Leave a comment Tool comparisons
In the ever-evolving landscape of test automation, Leapwork and Repeato stand out as robust, no-code solutions designed to streamline the testing process. Leapwork caters to a variety of applications and technologies with its AI-driven platform, offering extensive support across web and mobile environments.
In contrast, Repeato specializes in mobile UI testing, harnessing computer vision and machine learning to enhance test efficiency on iOS and Android platforms. Both tools promise ease of use and integration with CI/CD pipelines, yet they diverge in their core functionalities and platform focus, with Repeato also offering a free plan and on-premise deployment options.
Latest update: 1/9/2024, 5:35:10 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.
Feature comparison of Leapwork and Repeato
| Feature | Leapwork | Repeato |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | – | ✔ |
| On Premise | ✔ | ✔ |
| Device Farm | – | N/A |
| Scheduler | ✔ | ✔ |
| No Code | ✔ | ✔ |
| Uses Ai | ✔ | ✔ |
| Generates Reports | ✔ | ✔ |
| Uses Computer Vision | ✔ | ✔ |
| Platforms | web,Android,iOS | Android,iOS |
| Ease Of Use | very easy to learn | very easy to learn |
| Is Open Source | – | – |
| Support Included | ✔ | ✔ |
| Review Pros |
– Comprehensive data storage abilities without being locked into a single solution. – Excellent support with timely solutions upon request. – Ease of use in creating subflows for reusable tasks, which benefits non-technical testers. – Enables manual testers to create automation without extensive coding knowledge. – GUI-based platform that is easy to learn with a supportive knowledge base. – No technical prerequisites required for use. – In-depth strategy editor that supports web, desktop, and API automation. – Seamless integration of test cases involving both desktop and web applications. – Video export feature of executed test cases for documentation and training. – Excellent debugging functionality, including live video execution and video recording. |
– Simple and intuitive interface – Easy setup process, no complex configurations needed – Accessibility for both developers and non-programmers – Supports various testing methods like clicks, drags and scripting – Exceptional stability, no crashes or driver issues – Regular updates with bug fixes and excellent customer support – Great for mobile app testing, with efficient script creation – Allows for hundreds of additional tests each day – User-friendly, with easy adaptation and no initial setup required – Recognizes elements using visual fingerprints for testing – Allows for reusability and easy maintenance of scripts – No prior training or complex coding skills needed |
| Review Cons |
– Minor user interface issues, such as watermarks not disappearing when typing. – Lack of check-in control in the Platform version compared to the Enterprise version. – Reporting features could be enhanced, such as email reports and dashboard improvements. – Identifying some web elements can be counterintuitive and may require advanced knowledge. – Mobile automation not built-in; reliance on third-party providers or tools is necessary. – Test execution can be slow when using remote agents. – Limited functionality for executing sub-flows compared to main flows. – Data-driven test automation from Excel is not dynamic and could be improved. – Limited Excel integration with only basic Read and Write blocks available. – Still an on-premises tool; could benefit from being cloud-based with automated backups and disaster recovery. |
– Some limitations for iOS applications when tapping on any system window outside of the app – Access to CI/CD tools is only available at the enterprise level – Occasional unknown errors while performing basic tasks, although they are quickly remedied in the next version. |
Pricing Models: Leapwork vs. Repeato
Leapwork Pricing Overview:
Leapwork Test Automation provides a customized pricing structure that adapts to the size and needs of different businesses and teams. Rather than offering set pricing tiers, Leapwork emphasizes a tailored approach, inviting potential customers to engage in consultations to receive a personalized quote. This method aims to match pricing with the specific demands of each organization, taking into account their business goals and team composition.
Repeato Pricing Overview:
Repeato’s pricing model is segmented into various plans, offering flexibility for a range of users. The Free plan caters to individuals or small projects without cost. The Basic plan costs €70 per month per user, and the Pro plan is €120 per month per user, both with unlimited testing minutes and additional features. For larger enterprises, Repeato provides a custom-tailored Enterprise plan, with pricing disclosed upon inquiry. All plans come with unlimited testing for Android and iOS, a suite of testing features, and email support, with premium plans including priority support and advanced functionalities. Subscriptions are flexible, allowing for changes or cancellations, and discounts are available under certain conditions.
Comparison of Pricing Models:
Common Points:
- Flexibility: Both Leapwork and Repeato offer pricing models that are adaptable to various organizational needs.
- Support: Each product provides some level of support, with the option for more dedicated support at higher tiers or through personalized arrangements.
- Customization for Enterprises: Large organizations can obtain a custom quote tailored to their specific requirements with both Leapwork and Repeato.
Key Differences:
- Pricing Transparency: Repeato offers clear, published pricing for its Basic and Pro plans, as well as a Free plan, making it easy for potential users to understand what they are getting at each price point. Leapwork, on the other hand, requires direct contact for a quote, which may appeal to businesses seeking a more bespoke pricing arrangement.
- Entry-Level Access: Repeato provides a perpetual Free plan, allowing users to test the platform without financial commitment. Leapwork does not publicly advertise a free or trial option, suggesting that an initial investment may be necessary.
- Billing Flexibility: Repeato allows users to upgrade, downgrade, or cancel their subscriptions at any time, which could be advantageous for businesses with fluctuating needs. Leapwork’s approach to pricing may involve more structured agreements due to the personalized nature of their quotes.
- Discounts Availability: Repeato explicitly mentions the availability of discounts for NGOs, educational purposes, and annual commitments, which could be a decisive factor for certain organizations. Leapwork does not specify discount policies in the provided description.
In conclusion, while both Leapwork and Repeato offer flexible solutions to accommodate diverse customer needs, Repeato provides more transparent, tiered pricing with a free entry point, whereas Leapwork focuses on a personalized pricing strategy that may better suit organizations looking for a tailored solution. Users should consider their budget, the scale of their operations, and their preference for price transparency when choosing between the two products.
