Repeato vs Accelq

Repeato vs Accelq

18 January 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In the realm of test automation, choosing the right tool is pivotal. Repeato and Accelq, both no-code, AI-driven platforms, cater to different needs.

Repeato is tailored for mobile app testing on iOS and Android, emphasizing ease of use with features like computer vision, while also being accessible to non-programmers. Conversely, Accelq extends its capabilities to web and API testing, offering a more comprehensive solution for various applications and industries. Understanding the nuances between these tools is crucial for efficient and effective test automation. This article will compare the two, highlighting key differences to help you make an informed decision.

Latest update: 1/12/2024, 1:25:33 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from and and summarized by us.

Feature comparison of Repeato and Accelq

Free Plan Available
On Premise Available
Device Farm AvailableN/A
Scheduler AvailableN/A
No Code
Uses Ai
Generates Reports
Uses Computer VisionN/A
Ease Of Usevery easy to learnvery easy to learn
Review Pros 1. Simple and intuitive interface
2. Easy setup process, no complex configurations needed
3. Accessibility for both developers and non-programmers
4. Supports various testing methods like clicks, drags and scripting
5. Exceptional stability, no crashes or driver issues
6. Regular updates with bug fixes and excellent customer support
7. Great for mobile app testing, with efficient script creation
8. Allows for hundreds of additional tests each day
9. User-friendly, with easy adaptation and no initial setup required
10. Recognizes elements using visual fingerprints for testing
11. Allows for reusability and easy maintenance of scripts
12. No prior training or complex coding skills needed
1. **Efficiency and Speed**: ACCELQ offers a streamlined testing process that enhances overall efficiency and speed.
2. **Self-Healing Capabilities**: The tool has self-healing features that help maintain test accuracy over time.
3. **Improved Test Coverage**: Users report that ACCELQ helps in achieving more comprehensive test coverage.
4. **Object Repository**: A centralized object repository aids in better test management and reusability.
5. **Defined Framework**: ACCELQ comes with a predefined framework that reduces setup time and effort.
6. **Logging Features**: Detailed logging capabilities are available for better tracking and debugging of tests.
7. **Defined Methods**: The tool provides predefined methods that can be used to streamline test creation.
8. **Salesforce Automation**: It is particularly strong in automating tests for Salesforce applications.
9. **Easy Maintenance**: Maintenance of tests is easier due to the tool’s design and features.
10. **Accelerated Development**: Advanced AI capabilities in ACCELQ support faster development of test cases.
Review Cons 1. Some limitations for iOS applications when tapping on any system window outside of the app
2. Access to CI/CD tools is only available at the enterprise level
3. Occasional unknown errors while performing basic tasks, although they are quickly remedied in the next version.
1. **Java Integration**: The need for an in-built editor for Java integrations to custom methods is an area for improvement.
2. **Desktop UI Issues**: Some users encounter issues with the Desktop UI, although alternatives like CLI are available.
3. **Grid Filters**: There is a need for enhancements in Grid Filters to support custom and diverse filter items.
4. **Data Warehouse Integration**: For those dealing with heterogeneous data sources, there may be challenges without a centralized data warehouse.
5. **ETL Testing Limitations**: While ACCELQ simplifies ETL testing, there may be complexities when dealing with varied data transformations and compliance standards.
6. **Learning Curve**: New users might experience a learning curve due to the advanced features and AI capabilities.
7. **Cost**: The pricing model may be a consideration for smaller teams or individual users.
8. **Limited Language Support**: Users who prefer programming languages other than Java may find limited support.
9. **Customization Limits**: Some users may require more customization options than what is currently available.
10. **Documentation and Support**: While not always the case, some users might seek more comprehensive documentation and support for complex scenarios.

Comparing Pricing Models: Repeato vs ACCELQ

Pricing Overview of Repeato

Repeato’s pricing structure is designed to accommodate various user needs, from individuals to large enterprises. It includes:

  • Free Plan: Ideal for individuals or small projects with basic testing needs.
  • Basic Plan: €70/month/user, offering unlimited testing minutes and additional features.
  • Pro Plan: €120/month/user, adding priority support and advanced testing tools.
  • Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing for tailored solutions with bespoke features.

Pricing Overview of ACCELQ

ACCELQ’s pricing model is equally versatile, targeting a wide array of testing demands across web, mobile, API, and manual testing environments. It includes:

  • Trial Options: For initial evaluation of the platform’s capabilities.
  • Enterprise Plan: A customizable plan for advanced features and needs.
  • Manual Testing Plans: With a free-for-life option for individual users and teams.

Comparing Pricing Models


  • Flexible Options: Both Repeato and ACCELQ offer flexible pricing plans to cater to different user groups, from free or trial versions to advanced enterprise solutions.
  • Enterprise Customization: Each provides a bespoke Enterprise plan designed for larger organizations, with pricing disclosed upon request.
  • Unlimited Testing: Both platforms include unlimited testing options in their paid plans, ensuring users do not have to worry about hitting any caps.
  • Support Included: Email support and operational features like backup and recovery are standard across plans for both products.


  • Pricing Transparency: Repeato provides clear monthly pricing for individual users on its Basic and Pro plans, whereas ACCELQ requires direct contact for pricing details, except for its manual testing plans.
  • Plan Structure: Repeato’s plans are user-based with a monthly fee per user, while ACCELQ’s model is more nuanced, with plans tailored to specific testing types (web, mobile, API, manual) and deployment options (cloud or on-premise).
  • Feature Access: While Repeato offers unlimited Android and iOS tests with various assertion and command options across all plans, ACCELQ distinguishes its plans with unique features such as no-code logic editors and self-healing capabilities.
  • Support Levels: Repeato provides priority support starting at the Pro plan level, whereas ACCELQ includes standard support features across all plans, with advanced support options likely tied to the Enterprise plan.
  • Additional Tools: ACCELQ offers specialized features like API virtualization and single sign-on as part of its enterprise offerings, which are not explicitly mentioned in Repeato’s plans.

In summary, while both Repeato and ACCELQ provide tiered pricing models to accommodate a range of users, Repeato emphasizes simplicity with clear, user-centric pricing, and ACCELQ focuses on a feature-rich experience tailored to varied testing requirements. Potential users should consider their specific needs, including the scale of testing, desired features, and budget when choosing between these two platforms.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from!