Pricing
Special offer: If you are working for a NGO, contact us and get repeato professional for free.
Free plan
Free
- Record and Playing
- Batch Test Composer
- Exporting Test Results
- Up to 25 tests
Professional plan
€39 / month€29 / month
+ Cancel subscription anytime
- Record and Playing
- Batch Test Composer
- Exporting Test Results
- Unlimited Tests
Enterprise plan
€129 / month€89/ month
+ Cancel subscription anytime
- All features of Professional Plan
- Unlimited Tests
- Sharing Test Setups
- Team support (5 workstations)
Interested in becoming a beta tester?
We are still looking forward for partners to test drive our product. Please get in touch with us, if you are interested!
Frequently asked
Can I upgrade from one package to another?
Yes you can. Anytime - just send us an email.
Can I downgrade from one package to another?
Yes you can. Anytime - just send us an email.
Why another UI testing tool?
There are dozens of UI testing tools out there. Espresso, Robotium, Appium, you name it. But they all lack one thing: Simplicity.
How is repeato different from other testing tools?
Repeato does not rely on the underlying structure of a UI for testing. Instead it uses computer vision and machine learning algorithms for handling the matching which is needed for doing asserts.
A real alternative to Espresso
Tired of trying to find the right view ID, mocking classes, creating idling resources or finding the right delays for your test automation? This is how repeato does things differently:
Common UI Testing Frameworks need to have a sophisticated understanding of how the UI is structured. In order to create asserts and click views, the testing framework needs a unique reference to the respective view in the view hierarchy (layout). Usually a manually set ID or the "layout path" is used as a unique reference and the developers needs to reference that ID when they write test automation code.
This approach comes with a lot of complexity which needs to be handled by the developer:
- Looking up view IDs
- Making sure that those are unique (IDs can reoccur in different places in the hierarchy)
- When layouts are refactored IDs often change, this breaks the tests, which need to be fixed
- Creating idling resources for asynchronous code
- Making sure view lookups and clicks are not executed before view is fully visible (problematic with view animations and fragment transitions)
- Installing additional framework components for handling automation outside of the app context (notifications, switching to other app)
Repeato does things differently. It operates fully on pixel data and does not care about the underlying structure of the UI. It basically sees what a tester would see by utilising computer vision (open CV) and machine learning (tensor flow).
Asserts are created by defining pixel regions, which can later be found again by the computer vision algorithm. Even when your design or device aspect rations change slightly.