Understanding Why Some Organizations Avoid Test Automation

Understanding Why Some Organizations Avoid Test Automation

3 July 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment QA

Test automation is a critical aspect of modern software development, yet some medium to large organizations still shy away from it. This article explores the various reasons behind this reluctance and offers insights into how companies can better integrate test automation into their processes.

Challenges in Adopting Test Automation

Several factors contribute to the hesitation in adopting test automation:

  • Return on Investment (ROI): Proving the ROI for test automation can be challenging. While automated tests can catch obvious issues, they might miss complex dependency issues that users encounter. This makes it difficult to demonstrate a direct correlation between automated testing and reduced defects in production.
  • Initial Slowdown: Introducing automated testing can slow down the initial development cycle. This is especially true for new software products that start as proofs of concept and evolve into production systems without automation in mind. Retrofitting a legacy system to be testable is often time-consuming and challenging.
  • Organizational Resistance: Many organizations resist the idea of spending extra time on unit testing, especially if they didn’t start with a test-first philosophy. This resistance can be found at all levels, from developers to management.
  • Cost-Benefit Misalignment: Companies often prioritize profit over quality. If decision-makers believe that investing in other areas will yield higher profits, they may deprioritize test automation.

Strategies to Overcome Hesitation

Despite these challenges, there are strategies that organizations can adopt to successfully integrate test automation:

  • Continuous Deployment: Implementing continuous deployment makes automated testing crucial and often mandatory. This approach ensures that code changes are automatically deployed to production, emphasizing the need for continuous automated testing.
  • Unit Testing Over Functional Testing: Unit tests are generally easier to write, faster to run, and less brittle than functional tests. They provide excellent documentation and isolate concerns, making them preferable in many cases.
  • Feature Switches and A/B Testing: These techniques allow organizations to test new features on a small audience, mitigating the risk of widespread issues. Feature switches enable code to be turned on and off instantly without redeployment.
  • Real-User Metrics (RUM): RUM captures error, performance, and human interaction bugs in real-time, providing valuable insights into how users interact with the software.

Case Study: Continuous Deployment and Microservices

Some large organizations, like The Guardian, have successfully implemented strategies that minimize the need for extensive automated regression tests. Their approach includes:

  • Swimlaning and SOA: By using microservices and caching, they ensure that even if one part of the system fails, the overall functionality remains unaffected.
  • Fast Release Cycles: Their continuous deployment pipeline allows for quick fixes in production, reducing the impact of any quality issues.

How Repeato Can Help

If you’re looking to integrate test automation into your development process, consider using Repeato. Repeato is a no-code test automation tool for iOS and Android that leverages computer vision and AI. It is particularly fast to edit and run tests, making it an excellent choice for organizations looking to streamline their testing processes. With Repeato, you can create, run, and maintain automated tests for your apps with ease, ensuring high-quality releases without the overhead of traditional automated testing frameworks.

For more information on how to effectively manage test automation, check out our documentation and blog for additional resources.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from!