Testsigma vs testRigor

Testsigma vs testRigor

1 February 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In the dynamic world of automated testing, testRigor and Testsigma emerge as two user-friendly solutions, streamlining test creation for non-technical users. testRigor stands out with its no-code AI-based approach, allowing tests to be written in plain English, and caters to a variety of testing needs with SOC2 and HIPAA compliance.

On the other hand, Testsigma offers a low-code AI-driven platform, complete with test recording and physical device testing capabilities. Both platforms support web, Android, iOS, and integrate seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines. Dive into our comparison to discover which tool best aligns with your testing requirements.

Latest update: 1/31/2024, 3:45:26 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.

Feature comparison of testRigor and Testsigma

Free Plan
On Premise
Device Farm
Generates Reports
Uses Computer VisionN/AN/A
No Code
Uses Ai
Ease Of Usevery easy to learnvery easy to learn
Is Open Source
Support Included
Review Pros 1. Allows writing and generating test scripts using plain English statements.
2. Offers integration with various tools such as JIRA and TestRail.
3. Capable of running tests on multiple browsers and devices simultaneously.
4. Features automatic test script generation, saving time and effort.
5. Provides efficient customer support, ensuring ease of use and implementation.
6. Eliminates the need for learning different programming languages or testing frameworks.
7. Enables the entire team to write end-to-end UI tests quickly without programming knowledge.
8. Generates human-readable test scripts that are easily understandable by anyone.
9. Automates test cases in a very short span of time.
10. Serves as a scalable solution for building a software testing process in non-software companies.
1. Rapid Test Automation: Users can automate most test cases quickly without needing expertise in specific languages or frameworks.
2. Customer Support: The support team is highly responsive and easily accessible directly through the platform.
3. Ease of Use: The platform is user-friendly, requiring minimal training to handle.
4. Test Step Grouping: This feature streamlines the development of new scripts by grouping test steps.
5. No-Script Automation: Offers a codeless approach to test automation, making it accessible to non-technical users.
6. Integration Capabilities: Testsigma allows for seamless integration with various tools, enhancing the automation suite.
7. Natural Language Processing (NLP): Testsigma uses NLP for test cases, making it intuitive to write tests in plain English.
8. Accessibility: It caters to users with non-technical backgrounds, allowing them to learn and use the platform effectively.
9. End-to-End Testing: It supports comprehensive testing, including validation of OTPs via Email and SMS.
10. Custom Functionality: Users can import custom code to extend functionality when required actions are not available.
Review Cons 1. The tool has been reported to crash occasionally, leading to more test case failures.
2. The cost of server resources may be a concern for some users.
3. Lacks educational materials to help improve QA efficiency for companies with less experience.
4. Some users have experienced issues with server responsiveness.
5. Initial challenges may be faced by companies with a limited QA team and lack of software testing knowledge.
1. Limited Database Testing: Currently, Testsigma does not support direct database testing, though some validation can be done using custom functions.
2. Reporting Features: The reporting capabilities are somewhat limited and could be improved.
3. Performance Issues: Some users have reported slower execution times and non-functional cloud devices.
4. End-to-End Testing Complexity: While possible, some users find end-to-end testing to be challenging.
5. Salesforce Integration: There is a need for improved integration features with Salesforce.
6. Ticket Tracking: Improvements could be made in how user-raised tickets are tracked.
7. Desktop Application Automation: Testsigma does not currently support the automation of desktop applications.
8. Element Inspection Limitations: Some elements cannot be inspected directly, requiring workarounds like Sikuli for interaction.
9. Occasional Errors: Users have encountered intermittent errors, sometimes due to platform maintenance or upgrades.
10. Lack of Transparency: There is a need for better communication regarding maintenance and updates that may affect test performance.

Pricing Models of testRigor and Testsigma

testRigor Pricing Overview

testRigor, a test automation tool, has a tiered pricing structure that starts with a Free plan, suited for open-source projects with public test visibility. The Private plan is the next tier, priced at $900 per month, offering private tests and additional features, with the option to buy extra parallelizations. Finally, the Enterprise plan offers custom pricing for larger organizations, complete with dedicated support and potential on-premise deployment. All plans include unlimited users and test cases.

Testsigma Pricing Overview

Testsigma provides an AI-driven test automation platform with three different pricing tiers: Free, Pro, and Enterprise. The Free plan is designed for smaller projects with limited testing needs. The Pro plan offers unlimited testing minutes and additional features for growing teams. The Enterprise plan is tailored for large organizations with advanced security and support needs. Both Pro and Enterprise plans require direct contact with the sales team for personalized pricing.

Comparison of Pricing Models


  • Free Tier: Both testRigor and Testsigma offer a Free plan, which is aimed at individuals or small projects with basic testing needs.
  • Unlimited Access: Each platform includes unlimited access in some form within their paid plans, whether it’s users, test cases, or testing minutes.
  • Tiered Structure: Both tools utilize a tiered pricing model, catering to different scales of usage and organizational needs.
  • Custom Enterprise Solutions: For large-scale requirements, both tools provide an Enterprise plan that includes tailored pricing and additional support.


  • Pricing Transparency: testRigor provides a clear starting price for its Private plan, while Testsigma requires potential customers to contact their sales team to obtain pricing for Pro and Enterprise plans, indicating a more customized approach.
  • Trial Period: testRigor offers a 14-day trial for its Private plan, whereas Testsigma does not explicitly mention a trial period for its paid tiers.
  • Additional Features: testRigor’s additional paid features include the option to purchase more parallelizations, while Testsigma’s Pro plan comes with unlimited automated testing minutes and a variety of device and browser combinations.
  • Support Options: The Enterprise plans differ in support; testRigor includes a dedicated manager and Slack support, and Testsigma offers dedicated support with an emphasis on advanced security options.

Overall, while both testRigor and Testsigma provide free and scalable pricing models to accommodate different user needs, they differ in transparency, trial offerings, and the specifics of their additional features and support. testRigor is upfront about its pricing for the Private plan and offers a trial, whereas Testsigma emphasizes a personalized approach to pricing and support, requiring communication with their sales team for detailed information.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from!