Testsigma vs Sofy

Testsigma vs Sofy

5 February 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In the evolving landscape of automated testing, Testsigma and Sofy stand out as prominent solutions. Testsigma is a low-code platform adept at testing web and mobile apps with AI-driven capabilities, offering features like a test recorder and physical device testing.

It caters to a wide range of platforms and boasts a free plan. On the flip side, Sofy is a no-code platform focused exclusively on mobile app testing, leveraging AI for test case generation without a free plan but with robust real device access. Both platforms promise ease of use and AI-enhanced testing, yet they diverge on platform support and pricing structures.

Latest update: 1/31/2024, 5:18:29 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.

Feature comparison of Testsigma and Sofy

Free Plan
On Premise
Device Farm
Test RecorderN/A
Physical Device TestingN/A
No Code
Uses Ai
Generates Reports
Uses Computer VisionN/AN/A
Ease Of Usevery easy to learnvery easy to learn
Is Open Source
Support Included
Review Pros 1. Rapid Test Automation: Users can automate most test cases quickly without needing expertise in specific languages or frameworks.
2. Customer Support: The support team is highly responsive and easily accessible directly through the platform.
3. Ease of Use: The platform is user-friendly, requiring minimal training to handle.
4. Test Step Grouping: This feature streamlines the development of new scripts by grouping test steps.
5. No-Script Automation: Offers a codeless approach to test automation, making it accessible to non-technical users.
6. Integration Capabilities: Testsigma allows for seamless integration with various tools, enhancing the automation suite.
7. Natural Language Processing (NLP): Testsigma uses NLP for test cases, making it intuitive to write tests in plain English.
8. Accessibility: It caters to users with non-technical backgrounds, allowing them to learn and use the platform effectively.
9. End-to-End Testing: It supports comprehensive testing, including validation of OTPs via Email and SMS.
10. Custom Functionality: Users can import custom code to extend functionality when required actions are not available.
– The support team is highly responsive and provides solid assistance.
– Mobile testing capabilities are particularly strong.
– Enables creation of test data and handling conditional logic through a record-and-play feature.
– Integration with JIRA and CI/CD pipelines enhances workflow.
– Facilitates rapid increase in test coverage.
– The ability to make API requests within tests allows for more comprehensive testing scenarios.
– Described as a user-friendly no-code solution, making it accessible for startups and non-developers.
– Encourages best practices in test writing through collaboration with a technical account manager.
– Supports testing on real devices and can connect to other devices via Bluetooth.
– Actively listens to customer feedback and regularly introduces new, helpful features.
Review Cons 1. Limited Database Testing: Currently, Testsigma does not support direct database testing, though some validation can be done using custom functions.
2. Reporting Features: The reporting capabilities are somewhat limited and could be improved.
3. Performance Issues: Some users have reported slower execution times and non-functional cloud devices.
4. End-to-End Testing Complexity: While possible, some users find end-to-end testing to be challenging.
5. Salesforce Integration: There is a need for improved integration features with Salesforce.
6. Ticket Tracking: Improvements could be made in how user-raised tickets are tracked.
7. Desktop Application Automation: Testsigma does not currently support the automation of desktop applications.
8. Element Inspection Limitations: Some elements cannot be inspected directly, requiring workarounds like Sikuli for interaction.
9. Occasional Errors: Users have encountered intermittent errors, sometimes due to platform maintenance or upgrades.
10. Lack of Transparency: There is a need for better communication regarding maintenance and updates that may affect test performance.
– Some users may find the product’s capabilities limited for cutting-edge or unique test cases.
– Web testing features are not as robust as mobile testing features.
– Issues with JIRA integration have been reported.
– The platform may require a learning curve and initial setup effort to integrate with existing CI flows.
– Test execution speed has been reported as somewhat slow by some users.
– Uses a minute-based pricing system, which may not suit all types of projects or budgets.
– Some users find the overall pricing to be on the higher side.
– Requires effort to automate test cases and connect physical devices via Bluetooth, despite the ease of use.
– The product is still growing and may not have all the desired features yet.
– Requires some technical effort to fully integrate test results with other continuous integration flows.

Pricing Comparison: Testsigma vs. Sofy

Testsigma Pricing Overview

Testsigma provides a scalable test automation platform with a three-tier pricing structure. The tiers are:

  • Free Plan: Ideal for small projects, offering basic testing features.
  • Pro Plan: Geared towards fast-growing teams, includes unlimited automated testing minutes, and a broad range of device and browser support.
  • Enterprise Plan: For large teams or TCOEs, featuring advanced security, unlimited storage, and custom options.

Pricing for the Pro and Enterprise plans is not publicly listed, implying a customized pricing strategy.

Sofy Pricing Overview

Sofy also uses a tiered pricing model, but with explicit costs for each tier. The plans include:

  • Starter Plan: Priced at $549/month for annual contracts, offering 2500 real device minutes and 2 parallel sessions.
  • Pro Plan: At $1499/month, this plan includes 7500 real device minutes and 5 parallel sessions.
  • Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing with tailored features like SSO and enhanced support.

Sofy provides a free trial and transparent pricing, while Testsigma opts for a more consultative sales approach.

Comparison of Pricing Models

Common Points:

  • Both Testsigma and Sofy offer tiered pricing models to accommodate different team sizes and requirements.
  • Each has a plan specifically designed for larger, enterprise-level organizations, indicating a focus on scalability.
  • Both provide integration capabilities and support parallel test execution.
  • Free options are available: Testsigma with a Free plan and Sofy with a trial period.


  • Transparency: Sofy lists specific prices for its Starter and Pro plans, whereas Testsigma requires potential customers to contact their sales team for a custom quote, creating a more opaque upfront pricing structure.
  • Customization: Testsigma seems to emphasize personalized service, potentially leading to more tailored pricing and feature sets, especially for Pro and Enterprise plans. Sofy also offers customization but primarily at the Enterprise level.
  • Entry-level Offering: Sofy’s Starter plan, while not free, provides a substantial amount of real device minutes and user access. In contrast, Testsigma’s Free plan allows smaller teams to start with no financial commitment but with more limited resources.
  • Resource Allocation: Sofy is very specific about the amount of real device minutes and parallel sessions available at each tier. Testsigma does not specify such limits for its Pro plan, suggesting unlimited use within the plan’s scope.

Understanding the key differences in the pricing models of Testsigma and Sofy is crucial for teams to choose the right tool that fits their budget and testing needs. Testsigma’s model is ideal for teams seeking a more personalized approach to pricing and features, especially if their requirements are not standard. On the other hand, Sofy’s straightforward pricing and tiered structure offer clear expectations for teams that prefer to know exact costs and resource limits upfront.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from!