Testsigma vs Robolectric

Testsigma vs Robolectric

5 February 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In the realm of software testing, Testsigma and Robolectric offer distinct approaches to quality assurance. Testsigma is a user-friendly, low-code test automation platform enabling non-technical users to conduct codeless testing for web and mobile applications with AI assistance.

Conversely, Robolectric is an open-source framework tailored for Android developers, facilitating unit testing within the JVM for multiple Android API levels, but requiring expert technical knowledge. Understanding the differences between these tools is key to selecting the right solution for your testing needs.

Latest update: 1/31/2024, 5:18:29 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.

Feature comparison of Testsigma and Robolectric

Free Plan
On Premise
Device Farm
Test RecorderN/A
Physical Device TestingN/A
No Code
Uses Ai
Generates Reports
Uses Computer VisionN/A
Ease Of Usevery easy to learnrequires expert technical knowledge
Is Open Source
Support Included
Review Pros 1. Rapid Test Automation: Users can automate most test cases quickly without needing expertise in specific languages or frameworks.
2. Customer Support: The support team is highly responsive and easily accessible directly through the platform.
3. Ease of Use: The platform is user-friendly, requiring minimal training to handle.
4. Test Step Grouping: This feature streamlines the development of new scripts by grouping test steps.
5. No-Script Automation: Offers a codeless approach to test automation, making it accessible to non-technical users.
6. Integration Capabilities: Testsigma allows for seamless integration with various tools, enhancing the automation suite.
7. Natural Language Processing (NLP): Testsigma uses NLP for test cases, making it intuitive to write tests in plain English.
8. Accessibility: It caters to users with non-technical backgrounds, allowing them to learn and use the platform effectively.
9. End-to-End Testing: It supports comprehensive testing, including validation of OTPs via Email and SMS.
10. Custom Functionality: Users can import custom code to extend functionality when required actions are not available.
Review Cons 1. Limited Database Testing: Currently, Testsigma does not support direct database testing, though some validation can be done using custom functions.
2. Reporting Features: The reporting capabilities are somewhat limited and could be improved.
3. Performance Issues: Some users have reported slower execution times and non-functional cloud devices.
4. End-to-End Testing Complexity: While possible, some users find end-to-end testing to be challenging.
5. Salesforce Integration: There is a need for improved integration features with Salesforce.
6. Ticket Tracking: Improvements could be made in how user-raised tickets are tracked.
7. Desktop Application Automation: Testsigma does not currently support the automation of desktop applications.
8. Element Inspection Limitations: Some elements cannot be inspected directly, requiring workarounds like Sikuli for interaction.
9. Occasional Errors: Users have encountered intermittent errors, sometimes due to platform maintenance or upgrades.
10. Lack of Transparency: There is a need for better communication regarding maintenance and updates that may affect test performance.

Pricing Overview of Testsigma and Robolectric

Testsigma Pricing Description

Testsigma presents a tiered pricing strategy suitable for different organizational needs. At the entry-level, there’s a Free plan offering basic testing capabilities, ideal for smaller projects or individual developers. Moving up, the Pro plan is designed for fast-growing teams, featuring unlimited automated testing minutes, a wide array of device and browser combinations, and parallel execution capabilities. It also includes integrations with various popular development tools. For larger organizations, the Enterprise plan extends the offering with advanced security features, unlimited storage, custom data retention policies, and dedicated support. Both the Pro and Enterprise plans necessitate direct contact with the sales team for custom pricing.

Robolectric Pricing Description

Robolectric, in contrast, is a free open-source software framework. It is designed to enable Android application testing in a more traditional JVM environment without the need for an emulator or actual device. As an open-source project, it does not have a tiered pricing structure or any associated costs for use, making it accessible to anyone from individual developers to large enterprises.

Comparison of the Pricing Models

When comparing the pricing models of Testsigma and Robolectric, several key differences and commonalities become evident:

Common Points:

  • Accessibility for Individual Developers: Both Testsigma and Robolectric offer options that are accessible to individual developers. Testsigma provides a Free plan while Robolectric is entirely free.
  • Support for Automation: Each product supports automated testing, with Testsigma offering it across various plans and Robolectric providing it as a core feature.


  • Cost Structure: The most significant difference lies in their cost structures. Testsigma uses a tiered pricing model with escalating features and support, requiring payment for professional and enterprise-grade capabilities. Robolectric, being an open-source project, incurs no cost.
  • Customization and Support: Testsigma’s higher-tier plans suggest a level of customization and personalized support that is typical of paid services. In contrast, Robolectric, as an open-source tool, would typically rely on community support and self-service resources.
  • Enterprise Readiness: Testsigma’s Enterprise plan indicates a focus on serving larger organizations with features such as advanced security, unlimited storage, and dedicated support. Robolectric does not have a differentiated offering for enterprises but can be utilized by organizations of any size.
  • Sales Interaction: To access the full suite of features in Testsigma, there is a need to engage with a sales team, which can be a consideration for teams looking for quick deployment. Robolectric’s open-source nature allows immediate access without such a process.

In conclusion, Testsigma and Robolectric cater to different market segments with their pricing models. Testsigma offers a scalable solution with a free entry point and customizable premium services for growing and large teams. Robolectric, on the other hand, is a cost-free solution that provides value to all users without the need for monetary investment, making it ideal for those with budget constraints or preferring open-source software. Users should understand these key differences to choose the solution that best fits their financial and testing requirements.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from!