In today’s fast-paced software development landscape, choosing the right test automation tool is crucial. Testsigma and Repeato are two contenders simplifying testing for mobile and web applications.
Testsigma is a low-code, AI-driven platform with a broad scope, including web, Android, and iOS testing, and it emphasizes ease of use with features like test recording and physical device testing. On the other hand, Repeato focuses exclusively on mobile app testing for Android and iOS, leveraging computer vision and machine learning to enable no-code UI test creation. Both tools offer free plans and aim to streamline the QA process, but their unique features cater to different needs within the test automation domain.
Latest update: 1/31/2024, 5:18:29 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.
Feature comparison of Repeato and Testsigma
|Uses Computer Vision
|Ease Of Use
|very easy to learn
|very easy to learn
|Is Open Source
1. Simple and intuitive interface
2. Easy setup process, no complex configurations needed
3. Accessibility for both developers and non-programmers
4. Supports various testing methods like clicks, drags and scripting
5. Exceptional stability, no crashes or driver issues
6. Regular updates with bug fixes and excellent customer support
7. Great for mobile app testing, with efficient script creation
8. Allows for hundreds of additional tests each day
9. User-friendly, with easy adaptation and no initial setup required
10. Recognizes elements using visual fingerprints for testing
11. Allows for reusability and easy maintenance of scripts
12. No prior training or complex coding skills needed
1. Rapid Test Automation: Users can automate most test cases quickly without needing expertise in specific languages or frameworks.
2. Customer Support: The support team is highly responsive and easily accessible directly through the platform.
3. Ease of Use: The platform is user-friendly, requiring minimal training to handle.
4. Test Step Grouping: This feature streamlines the development of new scripts by grouping test steps.
5. No-Script Automation: Offers a codeless approach to test automation, making it accessible to non-technical users.
6. Integration Capabilities: Testsigma allows for seamless integration with various tools, enhancing the automation suite.
7. Natural Language Processing (NLP): Testsigma uses NLP for test cases, making it intuitive to write tests in plain English.
8. Accessibility: It caters to users with non-technical backgrounds, allowing them to learn and use the platform effectively.
9. End-to-End Testing: It supports comprehensive testing, including validation of OTPs via Email and SMS.
10. Custom Functionality: Users can import custom code to extend functionality when required actions are not available.
1. Some limitations for iOS applications when tapping on any system window outside of the app
2. Access to CI/CD tools is only available at the enterprise level
3. Occasional unknown errors while performing basic tasks, although they are quickly remedied in the next version.
1. Limited Database Testing: Currently, Testsigma does not support direct database testing, though some validation can be done using custom functions.
2. Reporting Features: The reporting capabilities are somewhat limited and could be improved.
3. Performance Issues: Some users have reported slower execution times and non-functional cloud devices.
4. End-to-End Testing Complexity: While possible, some users find end-to-end testing to be challenging.
5. Salesforce Integration: There is a need for improved integration features with Salesforce.
6. Ticket Tracking: Improvements could be made in how user-raised tickets are tracked.
7. Desktop Application Automation: Testsigma does not currently support the automation of desktop applications.
8. Element Inspection Limitations: Some elements cannot be inspected directly, requiring workarounds like Sikuli for interaction.
9. Occasional Errors: Users have encountered intermittent errors, sometimes due to platform maintenance or upgrades.
10. Lack of Transparency: There is a need for better communication regarding maintenance and updates that may affect test performance.
Pricing Models Comparison: Testsigma vs. Repeato
Testsigma Pricing Overview
Testsigma introduces an AI-driven testing platform with a tiered pricing structure. It includes:
- Free Plan: Limited testing capabilities for smaller projects.
- Pro Plan: Offers unlimited automated testing minutes and other advanced features.
- Enterprise Plan: Tailored for large teams with advanced security and dedicated support.
Repeato Pricing Overview
Repeato provides a flexible test automation platform with the following options:
- Free Plan: Perpetual and suitable for individuals or small projects.
- Basic Plan: Priced at €70/month/user, offering unlimited testing and additional features.
- Pro Plan: At €120/month/user, this plan includes priority support and more.
- Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing for organizations with unique requirements.
Common Points in Pricing Models
Both Testsigma and Repeato offer free plans designed for smaller projects or individuals just starting out with automation testing. These free options are great for users to get acquainted with the platforms without financial commitment.
As the needs of users grow, both platforms provide more robust plans. They share similar strategies in catering to larger teams or projects by requiring potential customers to get in touch for customized pricing, which implies a personalized approach based on the specific needs and scales of the projects.
Each platform also emphasizes integration capabilities and support, although the specifics and extent of these features vary depending on the plan selected.
Key Differences in Pricing Models
- Pricing Transparency: Repeato offers transparent pricing for its Basic and Pro plans, while Testsigma opts for a more customized pricing approach, requiring interested parties to request quotes for its Pro and Enterprise plans.
- Billing Structure: Repeato’s plans are billed on a per-user, per-month basis, which can simplify budgeting for small to mid-sized teams. Testsigma, meanwhile, does not publicly disclose the structure of its billing, suggesting a more complex and tailored pricing strategy.
- Plan Options: Repeato provides an intermediate option with its Basic plan, which could be attractive to smaller teams that have outgrown the Free plan but are not yet ready for Pro-level investment. Testsigma offers a more binary choice with a significant leap from Free to Pro.
- Support and Resources: While both offer varying levels of support, Repeato specifies the inclusion of email support in all plans, with priority support beginning at the Pro level. Testsigma mentions dedicated support but reserves it for its Enterprise customers.
- Flexibility: Repeato users have the freedom to upgrade, downgrade, or cancel their subscriptions at any time, which may appeal to businesses with fluctuating needs. Testsigma provides less information on the flexibility of plan changes, directing users to contact sales for more details.
In summary, Testsigma and Repeato both cater to a range of users from individuals to large enterprises, but they differ significantly in how they structure and present their pricing. Repeato offers more transparency and flexibility for individual users and small teams, while Testsigma appears to target larger, more complex projects with its personalized pricing structure.