Testsigma vs Perfecto

Testsigma vs Perfecto

5 February 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In the dynamic realm of test automation, Testsigma and Perfecto stand out with distinct features tailored for enhancing quality assurance. Testsigma offers a low-code, AI-driven platform that excels in ease of use with capabilities like no-script automation and test recording, suitable for web and mobile applications.

Conversely, Perfecto provides a robust enterprise solution with both scripted and codeless options, leveraging AI and computer vision for comprehensive web and mobile app testing. This comparison will dissect their unique strengths and limitations to help you decide the optimal tool for your testing needs.

(Note: The comparison will follow in the main body of the article, detailing specific features, use cases, and user feedback.)

Latest update: 1/31/2024, 5:18:29 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.

Feature comparison of Testsigma and Perfecto

Free Plan
On Premise
Device Farm
Test RecorderN/A
Physical Device TestingN/A
No Code
Uses Ai
Generates Reports
Uses Computer VisionN/A
Ease Of Usevery easy to learneasy to learn
Is Open Source
Support Included
Review Pros 1. Rapid Test Automation: Users can automate most test cases quickly without needing expertise in specific languages or frameworks.
2. Customer Support: The support team is highly responsive and easily accessible directly through the platform.
3. Ease of Use: The platform is user-friendly, requiring minimal training to handle.
4. Test Step Grouping: This feature streamlines the development of new scripts by grouping test steps.
5. No-Script Automation: Offers a codeless approach to test automation, making it accessible to non-technical users.
6. Integration Capabilities: Testsigma allows for seamless integration with various tools, enhancing the automation suite.
7. Natural Language Processing (NLP): Testsigma uses NLP for test cases, making it intuitive to write tests in plain English.
8. Accessibility: It caters to users with non-technical backgrounds, allowing them to learn and use the platform effectively.
9. End-to-End Testing: It supports comprehensive testing, including validation of OTPs via Email and SMS.
10. Custom Functionality: Users can import custom code to extend functionality when required actions are not available.
1. Integration with Automation Frameworks: Perfecto seamlessly integrates with leading test automation frameworks such as Selenium and Appium, enhancing the efficiency of scripting and execution of automated tests.
2. Device Availability: Offers a comprehensive array of real and virtual devices, enabling teams to test their applications on a variety of devices and operating systems.
3. Ease of Use: The dashboard is user-friendly, clean, and straightforward, making it easier for teams to navigate and control required device functionalities.
4. Remote Accessibility: Enables distributed teams to access and share devices for testing purposes, regardless of their geographical location, solving the problem of device sharing among teams in different regions.
5. Real Device Testing: Provides access to real devices, which is crucial for realistic testing scenarios such as opening a camera or toggling Wi-Fi settings.
6. Support for macOS Devices: In addition to mobile devices, Perfecto offers macOS devices for testing, reducing the need for physical devices.
7. Efficiency in Execution: Perfecto has shown to significantly reduce the effort required during test execution, with reports of saving up to 95% of effort in regression testing suites.
8. Versatility: The tool is versatile and has been successfully employed for testing various types of applications in real-world scenarios.
Review Cons 1. Limited Database Testing: Currently, Testsigma does not support direct database testing, though some validation can be done using custom functions.
2. Reporting Features: The reporting capabilities are somewhat limited and could be improved.
3. Performance Issues: Some users have reported slower execution times and non-functional cloud devices.
4. End-to-End Testing Complexity: While possible, some users find end-to-end testing to be challenging.
5. Salesforce Integration: There is a need for improved integration features with Salesforce.
6. Ticket Tracking: Improvements could be made in how user-raised tickets are tracked.
7. Desktop Application Automation: Testsigma does not currently support the automation of desktop applications.
8. Element Inspection Limitations: Some elements cannot be inspected directly, requiring workarounds like Sikuli for interaction.
9. Occasional Errors: Users have encountered intermittent errors, sometimes due to platform maintenance or upgrades.
10. Lack of Transparency: There is a need for better communication regarding maintenance and updates that may affect test performance.
1. Cost Concerns: The cloud-based testing service can be costly, which might be a barrier for smaller teams or projects with limited budgets.
2. Learning Curve: New users may face a learning curve when transitioning from other tools or methodologies to Perfecto.
3. Regular Expressions Complexity: Users have found the regular expressions used for device selection to be confusing and unclear.
4. Device Update Frequency: There is feedback suggesting that the range of leading devices should be updated more frequently to keep up with the latest models.
5. Availability Issues: Occasionally, there are issues with device availability, where specific devices or versions are not accessible or encounter errors after updates or restarts.
6. Lack of Negative Feedback: Currently, there is a scarcity of specific negative feedback, which could be due to users not encountering significant issues or the platform not being extensively reviewed in certain aspects.

Comparative Analysis of Testsigma and Perfecto Pricing Models

Testsigma Pricing Overview

Testsigma presents a tiered pricing structure with three main plans: Free, Pro, and Enterprise. The Free plan is designed for smaller projects and offers basic testing capabilities. The Pro plan is aimed at fast-growing teams and includes benefits like unlimited automated testing minutes, extensive device and browser combinations, and parallel execution. The Enterprise plan is tailored for large organizations, offering advanced security features, unlimited storage, and dedicated support. The latter two plans require a customized quote, which suggests a flexible pricing approach based on the specific needs of the customer.

Perfecto Pricing Overview

Perfecto provides a subscription-based pricing model with four plans: Live, Automate, Scriptless, and Enterprise. The Live plan starts at $83 per month for manual testing, whereas the Automate plan includes both manual and automated testing at $125 per month, with both prices based on annual billing. The Scriptless and Enterprise plans necessitate direct contact with sales for pricing, indicating a customizable pricing strategy for more complex requirements. All plans feature unlimited users and testing minutes, with a minimum commitment of 12 months. Support is included across all plans, with additional professional services available for enhanced automation guidance.

Comparison of Pricing Models

Common Points

  • Tiered Plans: Both Testsigma and Perfecto offer multiple pricing tiers, catering to different team sizes and project complexities.
  • Custom Enterprise Solutions: Each provides an Enterprise-level plan that requires contacting sales, suggesting personalized solutions and pricing for larger organizations.
  • Integrated Support: Both companies include support services in their plans, ensuring users have access to help when needed.

Key Differences

  • Free Option: Testsigma offers a Free tier, which is suitable for smaller projects or teams beginning to explore test automation, while Perfecto does not have a free tier.
  • Billing Structure: Perfecto has a clear upfront monthly cost (billed annually) for its Live and Automate plans, whereas Testsigma requires interested parties to contact their sales team for Pro and Enterprise plan pricing.
  • Commitment Period: Perfecto requires a minimum 12-month commitment with a 60-day cancellation notice for public cloud customers, which is not explicitly mentioned by Testsigma.
  • Unlimited Testing Minutes: Perfecto provides unlimited testing minutes across all plans, while Testsigma restricts testing minutes in its Free plan.
  • Customization: Testsigma emphasizes a customized approach to pricing, particularly for its Pro and Enterprise plans, which may appeal to businesses seeking a tailored solution.
  • Minimum Users: Perfecto offers unlimited users in all plans, which contrasts with Testsigma’s approach where plan capabilities suggest a scaling user base.


Readers looking to understand the key differences between Testsigma and Perfecto pricing models should consider their specific needs in terms of team size, project complexity, and budget. Those seeking a no-cost entry point might lean towards Testsigma’s Free plan, while teams ready for a financial commitment might find Perfecto’s transparent pricing and unlimited testing minutes appealing. For large-scale enterprise needs, both platforms offer customizable plans that warrant further discussion with their sales teams to determine the best fit.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from!