Testsigma vs Bitbar

Testsigma vs Bitbar

5 February 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In the dynamic realm of test automation, Testsigma and Bitbar emerge as prominent contenders. Testsigma is a low-code, AI-powered platform designed for ease of use, supporting codeless operations for mobile, web, and API application testing.


It boasts a free plan, on-premise deployment, and AI-driven features. Conversely, Bitbar is a versatile, cloud-based solution from SmartBear, offering an array of real devices and browsers for web and mobile app testing, with no permanent free plan but a 14-day trial. This comparison will discern the nuances between their offerings, aiding in selecting the ideal tool for your testing needs.


Latest update: 1/31/2024, 5:18:29 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.


Feature comparison of Testsigma and Bitbar

FeatureTestsigmaBitbar
Free Plan
On Premise
Device Farm
SchedulerN/A
Test RecorderN/A
Physical Device TestingN/A
No Code
Uses Ai
Generates Reports
Uses Computer VisionN/A
Platformsweb,Android,iOSweb,Android,iOS
Ease Of Usevery easy to learneasy to learn
Is Open Source
Support Included
Review Pros 1. Rapid Test Automation: Users can automate most test cases quickly without needing expertise in specific languages or frameworks.
2. Customer Support: The support team is highly responsive and easily accessible directly through the platform.
3. Ease of Use: The platform is user-friendly, requiring minimal training to handle.
4. Test Step Grouping: This feature streamlines the development of new scripts by grouping test steps.
5. No-Script Automation: Offers a codeless approach to test automation, making it accessible to non-technical users.
6. Integration Capabilities: Testsigma allows for seamless integration with various tools, enhancing the automation suite.
7. Natural Language Processing (NLP): Testsigma uses NLP for test cases, making it intuitive to write tests in plain English.
8. Accessibility: It caters to users with non-technical backgrounds, allowing them to learn and use the platform effectively.
9. End-to-End Testing: It supports comprehensive testing, including validation of OTPs via Email and SMS.
10. Custom Functionality: Users can import custom code to extend functionality when required actions are not available.
– Extensive support for cross-browser testing, allowing for quick identification of bugs.
– Ability to take screenshots and record tests when a test case fails, enhancing the debugging process.
– Offers a Record & Play feature which is highly valued by users.
– User-friendly interface that supports a large number of browsers, making it easy to test across different environments.
– Positive feedback on the tool’s reliability with no significant dislikes reported by some users.
– Simplifies site updates and cross-browser compatibility checks for multiple clients.
– Provides a wide range of systems and devices for testing purposes.
– Enables efficient automation of testing across various devices and operating systems.
– Cost-effective, with the tool’s efficiency offsetting the expense through time savings.
– Effective dashboard that provides a quick and concise overview of testing status and results.
Review Cons 1. Limited Database Testing: Currently, Testsigma does not support direct database testing, though some validation can be done using custom functions.
2. Reporting Features: The reporting capabilities are somewhat limited and could be improved.
3. Performance Issues: Some users have reported slower execution times and non-functional cloud devices.
4. End-to-End Testing Complexity: While possible, some users find end-to-end testing to be challenging.
5. Salesforce Integration: There is a need for improved integration features with Salesforce.
6. Ticket Tracking: Improvements could be made in how user-raised tickets are tracked.
7. Desktop Application Automation: Testsigma does not currently support the automation of desktop applications.
8. Element Inspection Limitations: Some elements cannot be inspected directly, requiring workarounds like Sikuli for interaction.
9. Occasional Errors: Users have encountered intermittent errors, sometimes due to platform maintenance or upgrades.
10. Lack of Transparency: There is a need for better communication regarding maintenance and updates that may affect test performance.
– Occasionally, web applications fail to launch on Internet Explorer (IE 11), indicating compatibility issues.
– Customer support experiences have been inconsistent, with some users finding it difficult to get clear answers and technical assistance.
– Aggressive sales tactics have been reported, leading to a negative experience for some customers.
– Pricing discrepancies and lack of clear communication regarding costs have been a concern, resulting in customer dissatisfaction.
– The user experience (UX) could be improved, especially for beginners; suggestions include having different modes for novice and expert users.
– The onboarding process, while praised for being quick and easy, could potentially be further optimized for new users.


Summary of Pricing Models for Testsigma and BitBar

Testsigma Pricing Overview

Testsigma’s pricing structure is designed to accommodate different team sizes and requirements:

  • Free Plan: Ideal for smaller projects with limited testing needs.
  • Pro Plan: Offers unlimited automated testing minutes, supports a wide range of device and browser combinations, provides parallel execution capabilities, and integrates with popular tools. This plan is well-suited for fast-growing teams.
  • Enterprise Plan: Tailored for large teams or Test Centers of Excellence, offering advanced security features, unlimited storage, custom data retention periods, and dedicated support. Pricing is customized and available upon request.

Interested parties are encouraged to engage with the Testsigma sales team for a personalized quote that matches their specific needs.

BitBar Pricing Overview

BitBar, by SmartBear, proposes a flexible pricing scheme that can be adapted to various testing demands:

  • Live Testing Plan: Priced at $39 per parallel per month (billed annually), this plan includes unlimited testing minutes and users, access to desktop browsers and real mobile devices, and advanced debugging tools.
  • BitBar Unlimited: At $177 per parallel per month (billed annually), this popular option adds unlimited automated testing minutes and includes a live parallel with every automated parallel, among other benefits.
  • Enterprise Plan: Customizable for businesses with unique needs, offering dedicated devices, private cloud setups, and premium support. Pricing details are available upon request.
  • Open Source Support: Free access for Open Source projects, illustrating SmartBear’s commitment to the Open Source community. All plans include a 14-day free trial.

Comparison of Pricing Models

Commonalities:

  • Both Testsigma and BitBar offer tiered pricing models, including a free or trial option to get started.
  • Each has an Enterprise level plan with customizable features and pricing, indicating a commitment to serving larger organizations with specific needs.
  • Unlimited testing minutes are a common feature in the paid plans of both products, ensuring users can test extensively without worrying about overages.

Differences:

  • Pricing Transparency: BitBar provides clear pricing for its Live Testing and BitBar Unlimited plans, while Testsigma requires contacting their sales team for Pro and Enterprise plan pricing.
  • Free Access: Testsigma offers a Free plan with limited functionality, whereas BitBar provides a 14-day free trial across all plans and a free option for Open Source projects.
  • Billing Structure: BitBar’s pricing is based on the number of parallels used per month and is billed annually, whereas Testsigma does not disclose specifics regarding billing, suggesting a more customized approach.
  • Support for Open Source: BitBar explicitly offers free services for Open Source projects, a feature not mentioned by Testsigma.
  • Plan Features: BitBar’s plans are differentiated by the inclusion of live parallels with automated parallels in the BitBar Unlimited plan, while Testsigma emphasizes different features such as advanced security, storage, and support options in its Enterprise plan.

Overall, while both Testsigma and BitBar aim to cater to a range of testing needs with scalable pricing models, the key differences lie in their pricing transparency, support for Open Source, and specific plan features. Potential customers should consider these differences in the context of their own testing requirements and budget constraints.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from.