In the realm of test automation, testRigor and UI Automator stand out for their distinct capabilities. testRigor is a user-friendly, AI-based tool that simplifies test creation in plain English, supporting web, mobile, and API testing with robust integration options, and is compliant with SOC2 and HIPAA.
Conversely, UI Automator is an open-source framework tailored for Android UI testing, requiring advanced technical skills to script interactions and validate UI elements. This comparison will dissect the differences between the no-code, cross-platform flexibility of testRigor and the code-centric, Android-specific precision of UI Automator.
Latest update: 1/31/2024, 3:45:26 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.
Feature comparison of testRigor and UI Automator
|Uses Computer Vision
|Ease Of Use
|very easy to learn
|requires advanced technical knowledge
|Is Open Source
1. Allows writing and generating test scripts using plain English statements.
2. Offers integration with various tools such as JIRA and TestRail.
3. Capable of running tests on multiple browsers and devices simultaneously.
4. Features automatic test script generation, saving time and effort.
5. Provides efficient customer support, ensuring ease of use and implementation.
6. Eliminates the need for learning different programming languages or testing frameworks.
7. Enables the entire team to write end-to-end UI tests quickly without programming knowledge.
8. Generates human-readable test scripts that are easily understandable by anyone.
9. Automates test cases in a very short span of time.
10. Serves as a scalable solution for building a software testing process in non-software companies.
1. The tool has been reported to crash occasionally, leading to more test case failures.
2. The cost of server resources may be a concern for some users.
3. Lacks educational materials to help improve QA efficiency for companies with less experience.
4. Some users have experienced issues with server responsiveness.
5. Initial challenges may be faced by companies with a limited QA team and lack of software testing knowledge.
Pricing Model Comparison: testRigor vs. UI Automator
testRigor Pricing Structure
testRigor offers a multi-tiered pricing model tailored to different user needs:
- Free Plan: This plan is suitable for open-source projects and includes unlimited users, cases, and suites. However, tests and results are publicly visible.
- Private Plan: Starting at $900 per month, this plan provides private tests and results, along with a 14-day trial period. Users can also purchase additional parallelizations.
- Enterprise Plan: Aimed at larger organizations, this plan comes with custom pricing. It includes a dedicated manager, Slack support, and a possibility for on-premise deployment.
UI Automator Pricing Structure
UI Automator is entirely free and open source, which means there is no direct cost to use the software. It is designed for accessibility and wide usage without any financial barriers.
Comparison of the Pricing Models
When comparing the pricing models of testRigor and UI Automator, several key differences and commonalities emerge:
- Accessibility for Open-Source Projects: Both tools offer solutions that cater to open-source projects. testRigor provides a free plan with unlimited access, while UI Automator is itself a free open-source software.
- Unlimited Usage: testRigor’s free tier and UI Automator both allow for unlimited users and test cases, which is beneficial for scalability and extensive testing needs.
- Cost: The most significant difference lies in the cost structure. While UI Automator is completely free, testRigor offers paid plans that provide additional privacy and features.
- Privacy of Tests: testRigor’s free plan requires public visibility of tests and results, which might not be suitable for projects requiring confidentiality. In contrast, UI Automator, as an open-source tool, allows for private use without any cost.
- Support and Management: testRigor’s Enterprise plan offers dedicated support and a manager, which can be crucial for large organizations requiring immediate assistance and a more personalized service. UI Automator, being free, does not inherently provide this level of support.
- Trial Period and Customization: testRigor offers a 14-day trial for its Private plan, giving users a chance to evaluate the tool before committing financially. Additionally, the Enterprise plan allows for custom pricing and potentially on-premise deployment, catering to specific business needs. UI Automator, on the other hand, does not have a trial period as it is free, nor does it offer customized plans.
- Additional Features for a Fee: With testRigor, users have the option to purchase additional parallelizations for faster execution, a feature not available with UI Automator.
Readers should understand that testRigor provides a flexible, tiered pricing model catering to a range of needs from open-source projects to large enterprises, with the option for additional features at a cost. In contrast, UI Automator is a free tool that offers simplicity and accessibility without the additional support or features that come with paid plans. The choice between these two products will largely depend on the specific needs of the project, budget considerations, and the level of support required.