testRigor vs Sofy

testRigor vs Sofy

1 February 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In the world of software testing, testRigor and Sofy stand out as two robust no-code, AI-powered automation tools. testRigor excels with its ability to write tests in plain English, offering a broad range of testing across web, mobile, and API platforms, and integrates with device farms for comprehensive coverage.


On the other hand, Sofy specializes in mobile app testing with AI-generated test cases and provides access to real devices for accurate testing. Both tools prioritize ease of use and generate detailed reports, but testRigor offers a free plan and test scheduling, contrasting with Sofy’s unique SofySense feature for enhanced QA processes.


Latest update: 1/31/2024, 3:45:26 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.


Feature comparison of testRigor and Sofy

FeaturetestRigorSofy
Free Plan
On Premise
Device Farm
Scheduler
Generates Reports
Uses Computer VisionN/AN/A
No Code
Uses Ai
Platformsweb,Android,iOSAndroid,iOS
Ease Of Usevery easy to learnvery easy to learn
Is Open Source
Support Included
Review Pros 1. Allows writing and generating test scripts using plain English statements.
2. Offers integration with various tools such as JIRA and TestRail.
3. Capable of running tests on multiple browsers and devices simultaneously.
4. Features automatic test script generation, saving time and effort.
5. Provides efficient customer support, ensuring ease of use and implementation.
6. Eliminates the need for learning different programming languages or testing frameworks.
7. Enables the entire team to write end-to-end UI tests quickly without programming knowledge.
8. Generates human-readable test scripts that are easily understandable by anyone.
9. Automates test cases in a very short span of time.
10. Serves as a scalable solution for building a software testing process in non-software companies.
– The support team is highly responsive and provides solid assistance.
– Mobile testing capabilities are particularly strong.
– Enables creation of test data and handling conditional logic through a record-and-play feature.
– Integration with JIRA and CI/CD pipelines enhances workflow.
– Facilitates rapid increase in test coverage.
– The ability to make API requests within tests allows for more comprehensive testing scenarios.
– Described as a user-friendly no-code solution, making it accessible for startups and non-developers.
– Encourages best practices in test writing through collaboration with a technical account manager.
– Supports testing on real devices and can connect to other devices via Bluetooth.
– Actively listens to customer feedback and regularly introduces new, helpful features.
Review Cons 1. The tool has been reported to crash occasionally, leading to more test case failures.
2. The cost of server resources may be a concern for some users.
3. Lacks educational materials to help improve QA efficiency for companies with less experience.
4. Some users have experienced issues with server responsiveness.
5. Initial challenges may be faced by companies with a limited QA team and lack of software testing knowledge.
– Some users may find the product’s capabilities limited for cutting-edge or unique test cases.
– Web testing features are not as robust as mobile testing features.
– Issues with JIRA integration have been reported.
– The platform may require a learning curve and initial setup effort to integrate with existing CI flows.
– Test execution speed has been reported as somewhat slow by some users.
– Uses a minute-based pricing system, which may not suit all types of projects or budgets.
– Some users find the overall pricing to be on the higher side.
– Requires effort to automate test cases and connect physical devices via Bluetooth, despite the ease of use.
– The product is still growing and may not have all the desired features yet.
– Requires some technical effort to fully integrate test results with other continuous integration flows.


Pricing Models of testRigor and Sofy

testRigor Pricing Overview

testRigor offers a tiered pricing structure aimed at different project scales. It begins with a Free plan designed for open-source projects, which includes unlimited users, cases, and suites, albeit with public visibility for tests and results. The Private plan is the next tier, priced at $900 per month, providing greater privacy, a 14-day trial, and private tests, with additional parallelizations available for purchase. For organizations with more extensive needs, the Enterprise plan is tailored with custom pricing, a dedicated manager, Slack support, and the potential for on-premise deployment. All plans come with unlimited users and test cases.

Sofy Pricing Overview

Sofy also utilizes a tiered pricing model tailored to teams of varying sizes and testing requirements. The Starter plan costs $549 per month (billed annually) and includes essential testing tools such as 2500 real device minutes, 2 parallel device sessions, and unlimited users. The Pro plan, at $1499 per month, provides more robust features like 7500 real device minutes and 5 parallel sessions. Enterprises can engage in custom solutions that include bespoke device minutes and sessions, SSO, and premium support. All Sofy plans feature CI/CD integration, manual testing, and test reports, with more advanced options and dedicated support at higher tiers. Free trials are available for those wanting to test the service.

Comparison of Pricing Models

Common Points:

  • Tiered Structure: Both testRigor and Sofy offer tiered pricing models, catering to various user needs from small projects to large enterprises.
  • Unlimited Users: Each platform provides plans with unlimited users, promoting collaboration across team members without additional costs.
  • Free Trials: Both services allow users to test their offerings before committing financially, lowering the barrier to entry.
  • Custom Enterprise Solutions: Each offers bespoke pricing and features for enterprise-level customers, reflecting the need for more tailored services in larger organizations.

Key Differences:

  • Free Plan Availability: testRigor provides a Free plan for open-source projects, while Sofy does not have a free tier but offers a trial period.
  • Pricing Transparency: testRigor discloses the starting price for its Private plan, while Sofy lists prices for both Starter and Pro plans. Enterprise pricing requires consultation for both, but testRigor mentions potential on-premise deployment.
  • Parallelization and Device Minutes: Sofy’s pricing explicitly includes real device minutes and parallel device sessions, which are key for mobile testing platforms. testRigor offers additional parallelizations for purchase, but does not specify device minutes.
  • Visibility of Tests: testRigor’s Free plan includes public visibility of tests and results, a feature not mentioned in Sofy’s offerings.
  • Support Levels: Both provide varying levels of customer support, but testRigor specifies Slack support and a dedicated manager at the Enterprise level, while Sofy mentions premium support.
  • Additional Features: Sofy’s plans come with CI/CD integration, manual testing, and test reports across all tiers, with advanced options in higher tiers. testRigor does not list these specific features in its brief.

By examining these points, readers can discern that while both products offer scalable solutions for different team needs, testRigor’s model is slightly more open-source friendly with its free offering, whereas Sofy provides more detailed information on device usage and parallel testing sessions, which may be crucial for teams focused on mobile application testing.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from.