testRigor vs Perfecto

testRigor vs Perfecto

1 February 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In the realm of automated testing, testRigor and Perfecto stand out as robust solutions, each with distinctive offerings. testRigor shines with its AI-powered, no-code interface allowing tests to be authored in plain English, ideal for teams with minimal technical expertise.


It supports a variety of testing types and integrates with third-party device farms. Conversely, Perfecto caters to enterprises with a comprehensive suite that includes cloud-based labs, AI-driven analytics, and supports both scripted and codeless test creation. While testRigor is SOC2 and HIPAA compliant and offers a free plan, Perfecto emphasizes its use of computer vision technology and does not provide a free tier.


Latest update: 1/31/2024, 3:45:26 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.


Feature comparison of testRigor and Perfecto

FeaturetestRigorPerfecto
Free Plan
On Premise
Device Farm
Scheduler
Generates Reports
Uses Computer VisionN/A
No Code
Uses Ai
Platformsweb,Android,iOSweb,Android,iOS
Ease Of Usevery easy to learneasy to learn
Is Open Source
Support Included
Review Pros 1. Allows writing and generating test scripts using plain English statements.
2. Offers integration with various tools such as JIRA and TestRail.
3. Capable of running tests on multiple browsers and devices simultaneously.
4. Features automatic test script generation, saving time and effort.
5. Provides efficient customer support, ensuring ease of use and implementation.
6. Eliminates the need for learning different programming languages or testing frameworks.
7. Enables the entire team to write end-to-end UI tests quickly without programming knowledge.
8. Generates human-readable test scripts that are easily understandable by anyone.
9. Automates test cases in a very short span of time.
10. Serves as a scalable solution for building a software testing process in non-software companies.
1. Integration with Automation Frameworks: Perfecto seamlessly integrates with leading test automation frameworks such as Selenium and Appium, enhancing the efficiency of scripting and execution of automated tests.
2. Device Availability: Offers a comprehensive array of real and virtual devices, enabling teams to test their applications on a variety of devices and operating systems.
3. Ease of Use: The dashboard is user-friendly, clean, and straightforward, making it easier for teams to navigate and control required device functionalities.
4. Remote Accessibility: Enables distributed teams to access and share devices for testing purposes, regardless of their geographical location, solving the problem of device sharing among teams in different regions.
5. Real Device Testing: Provides access to real devices, which is crucial for realistic testing scenarios such as opening a camera or toggling Wi-Fi settings.
6. Support for macOS Devices: In addition to mobile devices, Perfecto offers macOS devices for testing, reducing the need for physical devices.
7. Efficiency in Execution: Perfecto has shown to significantly reduce the effort required during test execution, with reports of saving up to 95% of effort in regression testing suites.
8. Versatility: The tool is versatile and has been successfully employed for testing various types of applications in real-world scenarios.
Review Cons 1. The tool has been reported to crash occasionally, leading to more test case failures.
2. The cost of server resources may be a concern for some users.
3. Lacks educational materials to help improve QA efficiency for companies with less experience.
4. Some users have experienced issues with server responsiveness.
5. Initial challenges may be faced by companies with a limited QA team and lack of software testing knowledge.
1. Cost Concerns: The cloud-based testing service can be costly, which might be a barrier for smaller teams or projects with limited budgets.
2. Learning Curve: New users may face a learning curve when transitioning from other tools or methodologies to Perfecto.
3. Regular Expressions Complexity: Users have found the regular expressions used for device selection to be confusing and unclear.
4. Device Update Frequency: There is feedback suggesting that the range of leading devices should be updated more frequently to keep up with the latest models.
5. Availability Issues: Occasionally, there are issues with device availability, where specific devices or versions are not accessible or encounter errors after updates or restarts.
6. Lack of Negative Feedback: Currently, there is a scarcity of specific negative feedback, which could be due to users not encountering significant issues or the platform not being extensively reviewed in certain aspects.


Pricing Overview of testRigor and Perfecto

testRigor Pricing Summary

testRigor presents a tiered pricing model that is particularly accommodating for various project scopes:

  • Free Plan: Unlimited users, test cases, and suites with public visibility of tests and results.
  • Private Plan: Starts at $900/month, including a 14-day trial, private tests, and additional parallelization options.
  • Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing with a dedicated manager, Slack support, and possible on-premise deployment.

All plans offer unlimited users and test cases.

Perfecto Pricing Summary

Perfecto utilizes a subscription-based model with a focus on flexibility and inclusivity:

  • Live Plan: From $83/month (billed annually) for manual testing.
  • Automate Plan: From $125/month (billed annually) for both manual and automated testing.
  • Scriptless and Enterprise Plans: Pricing available upon contacting sales.

All plans feature unlimited users and testing minutes, with a 12-month minimum commitment.

Comparison of Pricing Models

When evaluating the pricing models of testRigor and Perfecto, several key differences and commonalities emerge:

Common Points:

  • Unlimited Users: Both platforms offer unlimited user access regardless of the chosen plan.
  • Tiered Structure: Each provider has a tiered approach to pricing, catering to different needs and organizational sizes.
  • Enterprise Customization: Both offer custom pricing options for larger organizations seeking enterprise-level solutions.

Differences:

  • Trial Period: testRigor provides a 14-day trial with its Private plan, whereas Perfecto does not explicitly mention a trial for its services.
  • Plan Visibility: testRigor’s Free plan mandates public visibility of tests, while Perfecto does not specify visibility constraints.
  • Pricing Transparency: testRigor’s pricing is upfront for its lower-tier plans, while Perfecto requires direct contact for its higher-tier Scriptless and Enterprise plans.
  • Commitment Length: Perfecto requires a 12-month commitment upfront, with cancellation options for public cloud customers, while testRigor does not specify a minimum subscription duration for their paid plans.
  • Support and Services: Perfecto includes support in all plans and offers professional services, while testRigor mentions Slack support and a dedicated manager only in the Enterprise plan.
  • Testing Focus: testRigor seems to focus on test automation, whereas Perfecto offers both manual and automated testing solutions across various devices and browsers.
  • Additional Features: testRigor allows the purchase of extra parallelizations for faster execution, a feature not explicitly offered by Perfecto.

Conclusion:

In summary, testRigor and Perfecto both provide scalable solutions with unlimited users and cater to a range of testing requirements. testRigor is transparent with its pricing and offers a free tier with public test results, making it potentially more attractive for open-source projects or small teams. Perfecto’s model is subscription-based with a commitment, geared towards teams seeking a comprehensive testing solution with both manual and automated capabilities across a wide range of environments. Understanding the key differences in their pricing models will help readers make an informed decision based on their specific testing needs and organizational scale.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from.