testRigor vs Marathon

testRigor vs Marathon

1 February 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In this comprehensive comparison, we delve into two distinct test automation tools: testRigor and Marathon. testRigor stands out with its AI-driven, no-code interface that allows test creation in plain English, making it highly accessible for non-technical users.


It supports a wide range of platforms, including web, Android, and iOS, and integrates with device farms for real-world testing. On the other hand, Marathon caters to more technically adept users, requiring a Marathonfile for configuration and offering advanced features like batching and sharding on Android and iOS. It is an open-source solution that emphasizes test stability and performance.


Latest update: 1/31/2024, 3:45:26 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.


Feature comparison of testRigor and Marathon

FeaturetestRigorMarathon
Free Plan
On Premise
Device Farm
Scheduler
Generates Reports
Uses Computer VisionN/A
No Code
Uses Ai
Platformsweb,Android,iOSAndroid,iOS
Ease Of Usevery easy to learnrequires expert technical knowledge
Is Open Source
Support Included
Review Pros 1. Allows writing and generating test scripts using plain English statements.
2. Offers integration with various tools such as JIRA and TestRail.
3. Capable of running tests on multiple browsers and devices simultaneously.
4. Features automatic test script generation, saving time and effort.
5. Provides efficient customer support, ensuring ease of use and implementation.
6. Eliminates the need for learning different programming languages or testing frameworks.
7. Enables the entire team to write end-to-end UI tests quickly without programming knowledge.
8. Generates human-readable test scripts that are easily understandable by anyone.
9. Automates test cases in a very short span of time.
10. Serves as a scalable solution for building a software testing process in non-software companies.
N/A
Review Cons 1. The tool has been reported to crash occasionally, leading to more test case failures.
2. The cost of server resources may be a concern for some users.
3. Lacks educational materials to help improve QA efficiency for companies with less experience.
4. Some users have experienced issues with server responsiveness.
5. Initial challenges may be faced by companies with a limited QA team and lack of software testing knowledge.
N/A


Comparison of Pricing Models: testRigor vs. Marathon

Pricing Overview of testRigor

testRigor offers a tiered pricing structure to accommodate different user needs and project scales. Its Free plan is particularly suitable for open-source projects, allowing for unlimited users, cases, and suites, albeit with public visibility. Stepping up, the Private plan costs $900 per month and provides private tests, a 14-day trial, and the option for additional parallelizations to speed up test executions. The top-tier Enterprise plan is tailored for larger organizations, offering custom pricing alongside benefits such as a dedicated manager, Slack support, and the option for on-premise deployment. Notably, all plans include unlimited users and test cases.

Pricing Overview of Marathon

Marathon is presented as a free open-source software. The details of its pricing model are not provided, but typically, open-source tools like Marathon do not have tiered pricing structures or additional costs for extra features or users.

Comparison of the Pricing Models

Common Points

  • Accessibility for Open-Source Projects: Both testRigor and Marathon cater to open-source projects. testRigor offers a specific Free plan with unlimited access, albeit with public tests, while Marathon is entirely open-source and free.
  • Unlimited Users: testRigor explicitly mentions unlimited users across all its plans, which is a common characteristic of many open-source software like Marathon.

Key Differences

  • Cost: The most striking difference is the cost. Marathon is completely free, while testRigor has premium plans starting at $900 per month.
  • Privacy of Tests: testRigor’s Free plan requires public visibility of tests, whereas its Private and Enterprise plans offer privacy. Marathon, being open-source, may not inherently provide private tests unless modified or managed privately.
  • Support and Management: testRigor’s Enterprise plan offers dedicated support and a dedicated manager, while Marathon, as free software, likely relies on community support and does not provide dedicated personnel.
  • Customization and Scalability: testRigor offers the ability to purchase additional parallelizations for faster execution and provides custom pricing for its Enterprise clients, suggesting a higher level of customization and scalability. Marathon may offer scalability but would require manual integration or development effort.
  • Trial Period: testRigor gives a 14-day trial for its Private plan, a feature that is not applicable to Marathon as it is free.

In summary, testRigor and Marathon serve different audiences with their pricing models. testRigor is geared towards businesses that require private, scalable, and supported test automation solutions, with a cost associated for premium features. Marathon, being free and open-source, appeals to those who are looking for a no-cost solution and are willing to leverage community support and manage scalability through their own efforts. Readers should consider their budget, need for privacy, level of required support, and scalability when choosing between these two products.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from.