1 February 2024 Leave a comment Tool comparisons
In the dynamic realm of test automation, testRigor and Applitools stand out with their AI-driven approaches. testRigor offers a user-friendly, no-code experience, allowing tests to be written in plain English, making it highly accessible to those with minimal technical background.
Contrastingly, Applitools harnesses Visual AI, notably with its Ultrafast Test Cloud and Eyes validation engine, to enhance test accuracy and efficiency. Both tools support web, Android, iOS platforms, and offer free plans, but testRigor emphasizes ease of use and integration with third-party device farms, while Applitools excels in visual testing through computer vision.
Latest update: 1/31/2024, 3:45:26 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.
Feature comparison of testRigor and Applitools
| Feature | testRigor | Applitools |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | ✔ | ✔ |
| On Premise | ✔ | ✔ |
| Device Farm | ✔ | N/A |
| Scheduler | ✔ | N/A |
| Generates Reports | ✔ | ✔ |
| Uses Computer Vision | N/A | ✔ |
| No Code | ✔ | ✔ |
| Uses Ai | ✔ | ✔ |
| Platforms | web,Android,iOS | web,Android,iOS |
| Ease Of Use | very easy to learn | easy to learn |
| Is Open Source | – | – |
| Support Included | ✔ | ✔ |
| Review Pros |
1. Allows writing and generating test scripts using plain English statements. 2. Offers integration with various tools such as JIRA and TestRail. 3. Capable of running tests on multiple browsers and devices simultaneously. 4. Features automatic test script generation, saving time and effort. 5. Provides efficient customer support, ensuring ease of use and implementation. 6. Eliminates the need for learning different programming languages or testing frameworks. 7. Enables the entire team to write end-to-end UI tests quickly without programming knowledge. 8. Generates human-readable test scripts that are easily understandable by anyone. 9. Automates test cases in a very short span of time. 10. Serves as a scalable solution for building a software testing process in non-software companies. | 1. Easy to use and implement into existing automation workflows. 2. Customer-focused support and assistance. 3. Facilitates the detection of unintended changes, especially in large applications. 4. Shallow learning curve, making it accessible for QA teams with less coding experience. 5. Enhances cross-browser and cross-device testing capabilities. 6. Visual regression testing moves beyond simple visibility checks to ensure visual perfection. 7. Integration with popular frameworks like Cypress for immediate feedback on changes. 8. Offers multiple SDKs for ease of creating and comparing visual snapshots. 9. Features like self-healing capabilities for cloud runners improve user experience. 10. Supports visual validation for accessibility and early component validation in the delivery cycle. |
| Review Cons |
1. The tool has been reported to crash occasionally, leading to more test case failures. 2. The cost of server resources may be a concern for some users. 3. Lacks educational materials to help improve QA efficiency for companies with less experience. 4. Some users have experienced issues with server responsiveness. 5. Initial challenges may be faced by companies with a limited QA team and lack of software testing knowledge. | 1. The platform can be sluggish on slower connections or computers. 2. Initial maintenance and setup may require some time to get used to. 3. Error reporting can be problematic for automated report generation. 4. Snapshot quality issues have been observed, although updates have addressed them. 5. Lack of built-in support for Azure DevOps Server on pipelines (though now available and updated). 6. Misuse of the tool due to a lack of understanding of its collaborative potential. 7. Branch and baseline management can be confusing, especially for non-technical team members. 8. The cost of Applitools can be prohibitive, especially for large companies requiring many accounts. 9. The GUI, while user-friendly, may oversimplify for advanced users or specific use cases. 10. While the tool is mature and comprehensive, its powerful features come with a high price tag. |
Comparative Analysis of testRigor and Applitools Pricing Models
testRigor Pricing Overview
testRigor, a test automation tool, employs a tiered pricing strategy. It begins with a Free plan suited for open-source projects, providing unlimited users, cases, and suites with public visibility. The Private plan is the next tier, starting at $900 per month, and includes private tests and the option for additional parallelizations. The top tier is the Enterprise plan, which offers custom pricing, a dedicated manager, Slack support, and on-premise deployment options. All plans come with unlimited users and test cases.
Applitools Pricing Overview
Applitools, specializing in automated visual testing through its Visual AI platform, also offers several pricing tiers. The Starter plan allows for unlimited tests, up to three users, and three parallel tests on the public cloud. Advanced plans like Eyes and Ultrafast Test Cloud provide unlimited tests and users, over 20 parallel tests, and various cloud support options, including dedicated and on-premise. They also have a free account option with 100 checkpoints monthly for a single user. Discounts are available for startups and open-source projects.
Comparison of Pricing Models
Common Points
- Tiered Pricing Structures: Both testRigor and Applitools use tiered pricing models, catering to a range of users from individuals and small projects to large enterprises.
- Unlimited Tests: Each service offers plans with unlimited test cases, ensuring scalability for growing testing needs.
- Free Options: Both provide free access tiers, although with different limitations and intended user bases.
- Enterprise Focus: Each company offers specialized plans for larger organizations that come with additional support and features.
Key Differences
- User Limitations: testRigor provides unlimited users across all plans, whereas Applitools limits the number of users in its Starter plan.
- Parallel Testing: Applitools includes parallel testing in its plans, with a clear emphasis on the number of parallel tests available, while testRigor offers additional parallelizations as a purchasable add-on.
- Cloud Deployment: Applitools provides more options regarding cloud deployment (public, dedicated, on-premise) compared to testRigor, which mentions on-premise deployment as part of its Enterprise plan.
- Visibility of Tests: testRigor’s Free plan requires public visibility of tests, while Applitools’ free option does not specify this requirement.
- Support Options: testRigor includes a dedicated manager and Slack support in its Enterprise plan, while Applitools provides enterprise support in its higher-tier plans.
- Pricing Transparency: testRigor’s pricing for the Private plan is clear, starting at $900/month, but the Enterprise plan is custom. In contrast, Applitools does not specify exact pricing for its higher-tier plans.
Conclusion
In summary, while both testRigor and Applitools offer tiered, scalable pricing models with free tiers, they differ in user limitations, parallel testing capabilities, cloud deployment options, and transparency in pricing. testRigor’s model is more straightforward with its pricing, whereas Applitools offers a broader range of features and support options in its pricing tiers, catering to a more diverse user base. Users should consider their specific needs for user access, parallel testing, and cloud infrastructure when choosing between these two testing platforms.
