Should QA Engineers Code Automated Tests?

Should QA Engineers Code Automated Tests?

3 July 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment QA

In the dynamic field of software development, the role of Quality Assurance (QA) engineers is pivotal. A recurring question in this domain is whether QA engineers should be expected to code automated tests, especially when a stable framework is provided. This article delves into this topic, offering insights and practical guidance.

Understanding the Role of QA Engineers

QA engineers are responsible for ensuring the quality and reliability of software products. Their tasks range from manual testing to the development and execution of automated test scripts. Given the technical nature of automated testing, the question arises: should QA engineers possess coding skills?

When Should QA Engineers Code Tests?

According to industry experts, it is reasonable to expect QA engineers to code tests if they have the requisite skills. Here are some considerations:

  • Skill Level: If the QA team has members with coding skills, it is beneficial for them to write automated tests. This ensures that tests are maintainable and efficient.
  • Project Requirements: Different projects require different testing approaches. Automated tests are ideal for regression testing, performance testing, and scenarios where repetitive testing is needed.
  • Efficiency: Automated tests can save a significant amount of time compared to manual testing, allowing QA engineers to focus on exploratory testing and other critical tasks.

Balancing Manual and Automated Testing

It is essential to understand when to use automated tests and when manual testing is more appropriate. Automated tests are not a one-size-fits-all solution. Here are some guidelines:

  • Automated Testing: Best for repetitive tasks, regression testing, and performance testing. Automated tests can quickly verify that new code changes do not break existing functionality.
  • Manual Testing: Ideal for exploratory testing, usability testing, and scenarios where human judgment is crucial. Manual testing is also beneficial in the early stages of development when the application is still evolving rapidly.

Tools and Frameworks for Automated Testing

Several tools and frameworks can assist QA engineers in writing automated tests. One such tool is Cucumber, which allows tests to be written in a human-readable format. This makes it easier for non-technical team members to understand and contribute to the testing process.

Additionally, no-code test automation tools like Repeato offer a solution for teams with limited coding skills. Repeato leverages computer vision and AI to create, run, and maintain automated tests for iOS and Android applications. It is particularly fast and easy to use, making it an excellent choice for quality assurance.


In conclusion, it is reasonable to expect QA engineers to code automated tests if they have the necessary skills. Automated testing plays a crucial role in ensuring software quality and can save significant time and effort. However, it is essential to balance automated and manual testing based on the project’s requirements.

For teams looking for an efficient and user-friendly automated testing solution, Repeato provides a robust platform that simplifies the testing process. By integrating tools like Repeato, QA engineers can enhance their testing capabilities and contribute to the overall success of the software development lifecycle.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from!