Repeato vs Mabl

Repeato vs Mabl

18 January 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In the dynamic landscape of automated testing tools, Repeato and mabl emerge as prominent solutions. Repeato specializes in no-code, AI-powered mobile app testing for both iOS and Android, emphasizing ease of use and integration with CI/CD pipelines.


It’s designed for those seeking a user-friendly interface without coding prerequisites. On the other hand, mabl offers a low-code platform primarily for web applications, with AI-driven capabilities, cross-browser, and API testing, catering to QA professionals and developers. While Repeato provides a free plan and on-premise options, mabl focuses on end-to-end test coverage within CI/CD workflows.


Latest update: 1/12/2024, 1:25:33 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.


Feature comparison of Repeato and Mabl

FeatureRepeatoMabl
Free Plan Available
On Premise AvailableN/A
Device Farm AvailableN/AN/A
Scheduler AvailableN/A
No Code
Uses Ai
Generates Reports
Uses Computer VisionN/A
PlatformsAndroid,iOSweb
Ease Of Usevery easy to learnvery easy to learn
Review Pros 1. Simple and intuitive interface
2. Easy setup process, no complex configurations needed
3. Accessibility for both developers and non-programmers
4. Supports various testing methods like clicks, drags and scripting
5. Exceptional stability, no crashes or driver issues
6. Regular updates with bug fixes and excellent customer support
7. Great for mobile app testing, with efficient script creation
8. Allows for hundreds of additional tests each day
9. User-friendly, with easy adaptation and no initial setup required
10. Recognizes elements using visual fingerprints for testing
11. Allows for reusability and easy maintenance of scripts
12. No prior training or complex coding skills needed
1. Easy to implement and deploy across teams.
2. Comprehensive documentation with practical examples and strong support from the mabl team.
3. Supports multi-browser and API testing, including Postman collection imports for end-to-end user flow automation.
4. No infrastructure maintenance required with a low-code approach suitable for non-technical teams.
5. Demonstrates good return on investment when compared to the cost of hiring full-time testing personnel.
6. Facilitates rapid test case development with built-in auto-healing capabilities, essential for Agile environments.
7. Features an intuitive visual trainer for quick creation and updating of test cases.
8. Supports multi-tab testing in browsers and captures visual comparisons and performance metrics.
9. Enables efficient test creation through features like data tables for testing multiple scenarios.
10. Offers SaaS automation, detailed test results, and a new learning platform (mabl University) for user training.
Review Cons 1. Some limitations for iOS applications when tapping on any system window outside of the app
2. Access to CI/CD tools is only available at the enterprise level
3. Occasional unknown errors while performing basic tasks, although they are quickly remedied in the next version.
1. Does not support native mobile test automation.
2. Lacks integration with some popular test management tools like Testrail.
3. Limited reporting options and areas for improvement in security features.
4. Occasional discrepancies between cloud and local executions, leading to unexpected failures.
5. The mabl documentation could benefit from more detailed, specific examples.
6. The use of labels for test organization can be confusing and has a learning curve.
7. Challenges with the Trainer incorrectly recording steps, requiring re-recording to fix issues.
8. Inconsistencies with tests that only run successfully within a test plan and not independently.
9. Lack of a more extensive community for user support compared to open-source alternatives.
10. Auto-healing feature can be overly aggressive and may incorrectly modify tests without user intent.


Pricing Overview: Repeato vs. mabl

Repeato’s Pricing Model

Repeato provides a multi-tiered pricing strategy designed to accommodate the varying requirements of its users. It includes:

  • A Free plan that offers basic test automation capabilities for individuals or small projects.
  • The Basic plan at €70 per month per user, suitable for small to medium-sized teams needing more features.
  • The Pro plan priced at €120 per month per user, targeting professionals requiring advanced testing features.
  • An Enterprise plan with custom pricing for large organizations with specific needs.

All plans feature unlimited testing minutes, support for Android and iOS tests, a range of assertion and command options, and email support. Higher-tier plans grant priority support and additional advanced testing capabilities. The subscription model is flexible, allowing users to upgrade, downgrade, or cancel at any time, with potential discounts for NGOs, educational institutions, and annual subscriptions.

Mabl’s Pricing Model

Mabl adopts a customized pricing framework, which requires potential users to request a quote. The key highlights of mabl’s pricing include:

  • Tailored pricing based on the team’s unique requirements.
  • A commitment to boosting test coverage by 90% and reducing bugs by 40%.
  • A personalized ROI analysis and market comparison during the pricing session.
  • A calculator tool to help estimate testing needs.
  • Integration support for the development lifecycle to encourage quality at scale.

Comparing the Pricing Models

Common Points

While the pricing models of Repeato and mabl differ significantly, they share a common goal of providing scalable solutions that cater to the needs of various users, from individuals to large enterprises. Both companies emphasize the flexibility of their offerings and the ability to accommodate growth or changing requirements. Additionally, each company provides some form of support, with the promise of aiding teams in achieving better test automation results.

Key Differences

The primary differences between Repeato and mabl’s pricing models are:

  • Pricing Structure: Repeato uses a tiered pricing model with clearly defined plans and fixed prices for individuals and teams, while mabl creates custom quotes tailored to each team’s specific needs.
  • Transparency: Repeato’s pricing is transparent, with costs available upfront for all but the Enterprise plan. In contrast, mabl requires a consultation to provide pricing, offering a more bespoke service but less immediate clarity on costs.
  • Support and Features: Repeato delineates support and feature availability according to the chosen plan, with more advanced features and priority support available at higher tiers. Mabl’s approach is to offer a package that is presumably inclusive of all necessary features and support but customized per organization.
  • Flexibility: Both offer flexibility, but Repeato allows for immediate plan changes by the user, whereas mabl’s customized approach may involve more negotiation or a review process for changes.
  • Value Proposition: mabl focuses on the ROI aspect, offering analysis and comparisons to justify its pricing, suggesting a value-driven model. Repeato’s value proposition is more straightforward, based on plan features and the allowance of unlimited testing minutes.

In conclusion, Repeato is best for users who prefer a clear, tiered pricing model with the ability to self-manage their subscription level, while mabl is suited for teams seeking a tailored solution with a consultative approach to pricing and value assessment.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from.