Leapwork vs Swift Snapshot Testing

Leapwork vs Swift Snapshot Testing

5 February 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In the dynamic world of software testing, Leapwork and Swift Snapshot Testing offer distinct approaches to quality assurance. Leapwork is a no-code, AI-driven platform enabling testers of all skill levels to automate tests across web, Android, and iOS applications without coding.


Conversely, Swift Snapshot Testing is a developer-centric library that leverages Swift’s XCTest framework for snapshot testing of iOS UIs, requiring coding knowledge. While Leapwork offers a broad industry focus with extensive support, Swift Snapshot Testing’s open-source nature caters to developers looking for a free, customizable solution. Choose Leapwork for no-code ease or Swift Snapshot Testing for hands-on code-based UI testing.


Latest update: 1/9/2024, 5:35:10 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.


Feature comparison of Leapwork and Swift Snapshot Testing

FeatureLeapworkSwift Snapshot Testing
Free Plan
On Premise
Device Farm
Scheduler
No Code
Uses Ai
Generates Reports
Uses Computer Vision
Platformsweb,Android,iOSiOS
Ease Of Usevery easy to learnrequires expert technical knowledge
Is Open Source
Support Included
Review Pros – Comprehensive data storage abilities without being locked into a single solution.
– Excellent support with timely solutions upon request.
– Ease of use in creating subflows for reusable tasks, which benefits non-technical testers.
– Enables manual testers to create automation without extensive coding knowledge.
– GUI-based platform that is easy to learn with a supportive knowledge base.
– No technical prerequisites required for use.
– In-depth strategy editor that supports web, desktop, and API automation.
– Seamless integration of test cases involving both desktop and web applications.
– Video export feature of executed test cases for documentation and training.
– Excellent debugging functionality, including live video execution and video recording.
N/A
Review Cons – Minor user interface issues, such as watermarks not disappearing when typing.
– Lack of check-in control in the Platform version compared to the Enterprise version.
– Reporting features could be enhanced, such as email reports and dashboard improvements.
– Identifying some web elements can be counterintuitive and may require advanced knowledge.
– Mobile automation not built-in; reliance on third-party providers or tools is necessary.
– Test execution can be slow when using remote agents.
– Limited functionality for executing sub-flows compared to main flows.
– Data-driven test automation from Excel is not dynamic and could be improved.
– Limited Excel integration with only basic Read and Write blocks available.
– Still an on-premises tool; could benefit from being cloud-based with automated backups and disaster recovery.
N/A


Pricing Overview: Leapwork vs. Swift Snapshot Testing

Leapwork Pricing Description

Leapwork Test Automation operates on a customizable pricing model, catering to a broad spectrum of business sizes and varying team requirements. Understanding that each organization has unique demands, Leapwork does not offer standard pricing tiers. Instead, they opt for a consultative sales approach. Interested customers are encouraged to engage in a conversation with Leapwork’s sales team to discuss their specific automation needs. Through this dialogue, Leapwork aims to provide a tailored quote that reflects the organization’s objectives and the nuances of their team’s workflow.

Swift Snapshot Testing Pricing Description

Swift Snapshot Testing, in contrast, is positioned as a free, open-source software tool. This means that there are no direct costs associated with downloading, installing, or using the product. It is designed to be accessible to anyone, from individual developers to large enterprises, without the need for budget allocation or financial approval processes. The open-source nature of Swift Snapshot Testing allows for community contributions, which can enhance the tool’s features and support over time.

Comparison of Pricing Models

When comparing the two pricing models, several key differences and commonalities are evident:

Common Points

  • Accessibility: Both tools are accessible to a range of users, from small teams to large enterprises.
  • Support for Various Team Sizes: Each product, in its way, aims to support teams with different dynamics and sizes.

Differences

  • Cost: The most striking difference is the cost. Leapwork operates on a paid model that requires a custom quote, while Swift Snapshot Testing is completely free.
  • Customization: Leapwork offers a personalized pricing plan that is tailored to an organization’s specific needs, whereas Swift Snapshot Testing has a one-size-fits-all approach in terms of cost (free) but can be customized in terms of functionality by the community.
  • Sales Process: The sales process also differs significantly. Leapwork requires direct engagement with their sales team to negotiate and finalize pricing, while Swift Snapshot Testing can be simply downloaded and used without any sales interaction.
  • Community Involvement: With Swift Snapshot Testing being open-source, there is an implicit invitation for community involvement in the development and enhancement of the tool, which is not a component of Leapwork’s pricing model.

In summary, organizations considering Leapwork Test Automation need to be prepared for a consultative sales process to receive a pricing plan that matches their unique requirements. This could be advantageous for those seeking a customized solution tailored to their specific needs. On the other hand, Swift Snapshot Testing is ideal for those looking for a cost-effective, community-driven tool without the need for personalized pricing or direct sales engagement. The choice between the two will largely depend on the organization’s budget, desired level of customization, and preference for community support versus structured sales support.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from.