Leapwork vs Shot

Leapwork vs Shot

5 February 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In the dynamic realm of test automation and UI consistency, Leapwork and Shot present distinct capabilities tailored to different needs. Leapwork offers a no-code, AI-enhanced automation platform suitable for web and mobile applications, emphasizing ease of use for non-technical users.

In contrast, Shot is an open-source, Android-specific tool that harnesses computer vision for screenshot testing, appealing to developers integrating with Gradle and CI/CD pipelines. Understanding their unique features and targeted platforms is key to choosing the right tool for your testing strategy.

Latest update: 1/9/2024, 5:35:10 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.

Feature comparison of Leapwork and Shot

Free Plan
On Premise
Device Farm
No Code
Uses Ai
Generates Reports
Uses Computer Vision
Ease Of Usevery easy to learnrequires expert technical knowledge
Is Open Source
Support Included
Review Pros – Comprehensive data storage abilities without being locked into a single solution.
– Excellent support with timely solutions upon request.
– Ease of use in creating subflows for reusable tasks, which benefits non-technical testers.
– Enables manual testers to create automation without extensive coding knowledge.
– GUI-based platform that is easy to learn with a supportive knowledge base.
– No technical prerequisites required for use.
– In-depth strategy editor that supports web, desktop, and API automation.
– Seamless integration of test cases involving both desktop and web applications.
– Video export feature of executed test cases for documentation and training.
– Excellent debugging functionality, including live video execution and video recording.
Review Cons – Minor user interface issues, such as watermarks not disappearing when typing.
– Lack of check-in control in the Platform version compared to the Enterprise version.
– Reporting features could be enhanced, such as email reports and dashboard improvements.
– Identifying some web elements can be counterintuitive and may require advanced knowledge.
– Mobile automation not built-in; reliance on third-party providers or tools is necessary.
– Test execution can be slow when using remote agents.
– Limited functionality for executing sub-flows compared to main flows.
– Data-driven test automation from Excel is not dynamic and could be improved.
– Limited Excel integration with only basic Read and Write blocks available.
– Still an on-premises tool; could benefit from being cloud-based with automated backups and disaster recovery.

Pricing Overview of Leapwork and Shot

Leapwork Test Automation Pricing

Leapwork Test Automation adopts a flexible pricing model tailored to meet the needs of businesses of varying sizes and teams with different requirements. Rather than offering a static price list, Leapwork opts for a more personalized strategy, inviting potential customers to engage in a dialogue to determine a customized quote. This approach allows Leapwork to consider various factors such as the size of the organization, the scope of the testing needs, and the specific functionalities required. The goal is to provide a solution that aligns with the business objectives and team structure of each customer, ensuring they pay for what they need without any superfluous costs.

Shot Pricing

In stark contrast, Shot is a free open-source software. This implies that there is no direct cost associated with acquiring and using the product. Open-source software like Shot typically relies on a community of developers for updates and support, and it may not come with the same level of personalized customer service or tailored functionality that a paid service offers. However, it provides an accessible option for individuals and organizations looking to implement test automation without the financial investment.

Comparing the Pricing Models

When evaluating the pricing models of Leapwork and Shot, several key differences and commonalities become apparent:

Common Points:

  • Both Leapwork and Shot cater to the needs of businesses looking to implement test automation software.
  • Each solution emphasizes the importance of aligning with the user’s specific requirements, albeit through different means.


  • Cost Structure: The most significant difference lies in the cost structure. Leapwork operates on a quote-based pricing model that is customized for each customer, potentially involving varying levels of investment based on the requirements. In contrast, Shot is completely free, eliminating the barrier of entry regarding cost.

  • Customization: Leapwork’s approach suggests a level of customization in terms of features and scale that Shot may not offer. With a personalized quote, customers can expect a package that is tailored to their unique needs, which can include support, maintenance, and specific functionalities.

  • Support and Services: Paid services like Leapwork typically offer dedicated customer support and regular updates as part of their pricing. On the other hand, Shot, being open-source, might not provide the same level of customer service, relying instead on community support and contributions for troubleshooting and enhancements.

  • Accessibility: Shot’s open-source nature ensures that it is readily available to anyone without financial constraints, which can be particularly beneficial for small businesses, startups, or individuals with limited budgets. Leapwork, while potentially scalable, may require a more substantial financial commitment.

In conclusion, businesses must weigh the trade-offs between the personalized, scalable solutions offered by Leapwork and the cost-effective, community-driven approach of Shot. The choice between the two will largely depend on the specific needs of the business, including budgetary constraints, desired level of customization, and the importance of customer support and regular updates.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from!