In the dynamic world of test automation, Leapwork and Perfecto stand out with distinct features tailored to enhance testing efficiency. Leapwork offers a no-code, AI-powered platform with a visual language, highly praised for its ease of use and support for web, Android, and iOS, but lacks a device farm.
Conversely, Perfecto provides a cloud-based solution with device farm access and AI-driven analytics, supporting both scripted and codeless test creation, making it versatile for enterprise-level mobile and web application testing. Understanding their unique capabilities is crucial for choosing the right tool for your testing needs.
Latest update: 1/9/2024, 5:35:10 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.
Feature comparison of Leapwork and Perfecto
|Uses Computer Vision
|Ease Of Use
|very easy to learn
|easy to learn
|Is Open Source
– Comprehensive data storage abilities without being locked into a single solution.
– Excellent support with timely solutions upon request.
– Ease of use in creating subflows for reusable tasks, which benefits non-technical testers.
– Enables manual testers to create automation without extensive coding knowledge.
– GUI-based platform that is easy to learn with a supportive knowledge base.
– No technical prerequisites required for use.
– In-depth strategy editor that supports web, desktop, and API automation.
– Seamless integration of test cases involving both desktop and web applications.
– Video export feature of executed test cases for documentation and training.
– Excellent debugging functionality, including live video execution and video recording.
– Integration with Automation Frameworks: Perfecto seamlessly integrates with leading test automation frameworks such as Selenium and Appium, enhancing the efficiency of scripting and execution of automated tests.
– Device Availability: Offers a comprehensive array of real and virtual devices, enabling teams to test their applications on a variety of devices and operating systems.
– Ease of Use: The dashboard is user-friendly, clean, and straightforward, making it easier for teams to navigate and control required device functionalities.
– Remote Accessibility: Enables distributed teams to access and share devices for testing purposes, regardless of their geographical location, solving the problem of device sharing among teams in different regions.
– Real Device Testing: Provides access to real devices, which is crucial for realistic testing scenarios such as opening a camera or toggling Wi-Fi settings.
– Support for macOS Devices: In addition to mobile devices, Perfecto offers macOS devices for testing, reducing the need for physical devices.
– Efficiency in Execution: Perfecto has shown to significantly reduce the effort required during test execution, with reports of saving up to 95% of effort in regression testing suites.
– Versatility: The tool is versatile and has been successfully employed for testing various types of applications in real-world scenarios.
– Minor user interface issues, such as watermarks not disappearing when typing.
– Lack of check-in control in the Platform version compared to the Enterprise version.
– Reporting features could be enhanced, such as email reports and dashboard improvements.
– Identifying some web elements can be counterintuitive and may require advanced knowledge.
– Mobile automation not built-in; reliance on third-party providers or tools is necessary.
– Test execution can be slow when using remote agents.
– Limited functionality for executing sub-flows compared to main flows.
– Data-driven test automation from Excel is not dynamic and could be improved.
– Limited Excel integration with only basic Read and Write blocks available.
– Still an on-premises tool; could benefit from being cloud-based with automated backups and disaster recovery.
– Cost Concerns: The cloud-based testing service can be costly, which might be a barrier for smaller teams or projects with limited budgets.
– Learning Curve: New users may face a learning curve when transitioning from other tools or methodologies to Perfecto.
– Regular Expressions Complexity: Users have found the regular expressions used for device selection to be confusing and unclear.
– Device Update Frequency: There is feedback suggesting that the range of leading devices should be updated more frequently to keep up with the latest models.
– Availability Issues: Occasionally, there are issues with device availability, where specific devices or versions are not accessible or encounter errors after updates or restarts.
– Lack of Negative Feedback: Currently, there is a scarcity of specific negative feedback, which could be due to users not encountering significant issues or the platform not being extensively reviewed in certain aspects.
Pricing Model Comparison: Leapwork vs. Perfecto
Leapwork Pricing Overview
Leapwork Test Automation offers a customized pricing model aimed at providing tailored solutions for businesses of different sizes and needs. The company does not provide upfront pricing but encourages potential customers to contact them directly for a personalized quote. This approach caters to organizations seeking a pricing plan that aligns with their specific business objectives and team requirements.
Perfecto Pricing Overview
Perfecto employs a subscription-based pricing model with clear tiers and options to suit various team sizes. The plans include Live, Automate, Scriptless, and Enterprise, each catering to different testing needs. Live plans for manual testing begin at $83 per month when billed annually, while Automate plans, which encompass both manual and automated testing, start at $125 per month, also billed annually. Scriptless and Enterprise plans necessitate contacting the sales team for pricing. All plans offer unlimited users and testing minutes and require a minimum 12-month commitment, with a 60-day notice period for cancellation by public cloud customers. Support is included, with standard and priority support options, and additional professional services are available for extra guidance in automation.
Pricing Model Comparison
- Tailored Solutions for Varied Needs: Both Leapwork and Perfecto recognize the diversity of customer requirements and offer solutions that cater to different business sizes and testing needs.
- Contact for Custom Pricing: For certain plans or to get a more personalized pricing structure, both companies invite potential customers to reach out directly.
- Support Services: Each company provides customer support as part of their pricing plans, ensuring users have access to help when they need it.
- Pricing Transparency: Perfecto offers more transparency with its pricing for lower-tier plans, providing specific starting prices, while Leapwork opts for a fully customized pricing approach without publically listed prices.
- Subscription vs. Customized Quotes: Perfecto’s model is subscription-based with defined tiers, which contrasts with Leapwork’s approach that requires a custom quote for each client.
- Commitment Period: Perfecto requires a minimum of a 12-month commitment for their subscription plans, while Leapwork’s commitment terms are not specified and could vary based on the custom agreement.
- Cancellation Policy: Perfecto outlines a 60-day notice period for cancellations for public cloud customers, whereas Leapwork’s cancellation policy is not detailed and may be dependent on the individual agreement.
- Plan Structure: Perfecto has distinct plans for live, automate, and scriptless testing, and an enterprise solution with varied features and access, while Leapwork’s plan structure is not disclosed and is presumably tailored during the quote process.
- Unlimited Access: Perfecto provides unlimited users and testing minutes across all plans, a detail that is not specified for Leapwork and may depend on the negotiated pricing plan.
Goal: Understanding Key Differences
In summary, while both Leapwork and Perfecto offer pricing models designed to accommodate a range of business needs, they differ in terms of pricing transparency, commitment requirements, and the structure of their plans. Perfecto’s subscription model provides clear entry points for businesses ready to engage with defined terms, while Leapwork’s custom quote approach is suited for those seeking a more personalized pricing strategy.