31 January 2024 Leave a comment Tool comparisons
In the realm of software test automation, Katalon and AccelQ stand out for their robust capabilities. Katalon offers a versatile quality management platform with AI-augmented features and device farm integration, suitable for various industries and team sizes, and includes a free plan.
On the other hand, AccelQ delivers an AI-driven, codeless test automation experience, boasting high ease of use and specialized tools, including Salesforce testing. While both platforms provide no-code solutions and AI-enhanced testing, they differ in their approach to visual testing, support for computer vision, and availability of a free tier.
Latest update: 1/31/2024, 3:45:24 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.
Feature comparison of Katalon and Accelq
| Feature | Katalon | Accelq |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | ✔ | – |
| On Premise | ✔ | ✔ |
| Device Farm | ✔ | ✔ |
| Scheduler | ✔ | N/A |
| No Code | ✔ | ✔ |
| Uses Ai | ✔ | ✔ |
| Generates Reports | ✔ | ✔ |
| Uses Computer Vision | ✔ | – |
| Platforms | web,Android,iOS | web,Android,iOS |
| Ease Of Use | easy to learn | very easy to learn |
| Is Open Source | – | – |
| Support Included | ✔ | ✔ |
| Review Pros |
– Reduced Effort in Test Maintenance: Users report that Katalon simplifies the creation and maintenance of reusable methods, which can reduce time and effort significantly. – Built-in Reporting Features: The platform automatically captures snapshots on test failures, which enhances the efficiency of reporting. – Comprehensive Test Features: Offers features like Record, Object Spy, and Frame Handling, which streamline the testing process. – Low Learning Curve: Katalon is accessible to manual testers, allowing them to transition to automation testing with minimal training. – Cross-Functional Testing Support: It supports UI, API, and Mobile testing within a single platform, reducing the need to manage different tools for different types of testing. – Community and Customer Support: There is strong community support for the free version and dedicated customer support for the paid version. – Facilitates Cross-Functional Roles: Enables testers to handle both manual and automated testing, effectively becoming cross-functional team members. – CI/CD Integration: For those who opt for the paid version, it offers Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment integration. – Codeless Automation: Provides a codeless automation option, making it accessible for teams with limited coding knowledge. – Efficiency in Test Execution: Users find that Katalon allows for faster test execution compared to manual testing, enabling more extensive and frequent testing. | 1. Efficiency and Speed: ACCELQ offers a streamlined testing process that enhances overall efficiency and speed. 2. Self-Healing Capabilities: The tool has self-healing features that help maintain test accuracy over time. 3. Improved Test Coverage: Users report that ACCELQ helps in achieving more comprehensive test coverage. 4. Object Repository: A centralized object repository aids in better test management and reusability. 5. Defined Framework: ACCELQ comes with a predefined framework that reduces setup time and effort. 6. Logging Features: Detailed logging capabilities are available for better tracking and debugging of tests. 7. Defined Methods: The tool provides predefined methods that can be used to streamline test creation. 8. Salesforce Automation: It is particularly strong in automating tests for Salesforce applications. 9. Easy Maintenance: Maintenance of tests is easier due to the tool’s design and features. 10. Accelerated Development: Advanced AI capabilities in ACCELQ support faster development of test cases. |
| Review Cons |
– Separate Licensing: Some users find the need for separate licenses for different features to be a disadvantage. – Cost for Advanced Features: Advanced features like CI/CD integration and Visual Testing require a paid license. – Mobile Execution Issues: There have been reports of instability during mobile test execution, where sessions unexpectedly close. – High Resource Usage: Users with less powerful hardware have experienced performance issues, indicating the platform may require substantial system resources. – Lack of Support for Legacy Systems: Katalon currently does not support automation testing for legacy Java UIs, which can be a limitation for some organizations. – Limited TestOps Analytics: The free version has limitations on the analytical results available through TestOps, pushing users towards the paid version for full functionality. – Separate Licensing for Cloud Features: Features like Parallel Cloud Execution and Cloud Tunnelling require additional licensing, which can increase costs. – Limited Free Features: Some users feel that the most valuable features are locked behind the paid version, which can be a barrier for smaller teams or individual users. – Hardware Demands: The platform’s demand on hardware resources can lead to slower performance on less capable machines. – No Bundled Packages: Users would prefer bundled packages for the various Katalon products to simplify licensing and possibly reduce costs. | 1. Java Integration: The need for an in-built editor for Java integrations to custom methods is an area for improvement. 2. Desktop UI Issues: Some users encounter issues with the Desktop UI, although alternatives like CLI are available. 3. Grid Filters: There is a need for enhancements in Grid Filters to support custom and diverse filter items. 4. Data Warehouse Integration: For those dealing with heterogeneous data sources, there may be challenges without a centralized data warehouse. 5. ETL Testing Limitations: While ACCELQ simplifies ETL testing, there may be complexities when dealing with varied data transformations and compliance standards. 6. Learning Curve: New users might experience a learning curve due to the advanced features and AI capabilities. 7. Cost: The pricing model may be a consideration for smaller teams or individual users. 8. Limited Language Support: Users who prefer programming languages other than Java may find limited support. 9. Customization Limits: Some users may require more customization options than what is currently available. 10. Documentation and Support: While not always the case, some users might seek more comprehensive documentation and support for complex scenarios. |
Comparative Analysis of Katalon and Accelq Pricing Models
Katalon Pricing Overview
Katalon offers a tiered pricing strategy for its Software Quality Management Platform, targeting teams of varying sizes and needs. The tiers are:
- Starter Plan: Free, suitable for small teams or beginners in test automation, offering basic testing capabilities.
- Premium Plan: Priced at $167 per month (when billed annually), tailored for professional-grade test creation and advanced testing workflows.
- Ultimate Plan: An enterprise-focused plan with custom pricing, including all-encompassing features for extensive testing requirements.
Katalon provides discounts for annual billing and package deals that bundle licenses and test results options. Special introductory discounts are also available for new customers.
Accelq Pricing Overview
ACCELQ also employs a multi-tiered pricing model aimed at a wide range of testing needs, with a focus on automation. Their offerings include:
- Trial Plans: Available for web, mobile, API, and manual testing platforms, featuring a variety of tools such as no-code logic editors and self-healing capabilities.
- Enterprise Plan: Custom-priced, includes premium features like single sign-on, shared agents, and API virtualization for larger organizations.
- Manual Testing Plans: Free-for-life options are available for individual and manual testing needs.
ACCELQ ensures that support and operational features like backup and recovery are included across all plans.
Comparing Katalon and Accelq Pricing Models
When comparing Katalon and ACCELQ, there are several commonalities and differences to note:
Common Points:
- Tiered Pricing Structures: Both platforms offer multiple pricing tiers, catering to different user groups from small teams to large enterprises.
- Annual Discounts: They provide incentives for annual billing, which can lead to significant savings for long-term users.
- Free Options: Each has a free plan or option, making it accessible for individuals or small teams to start with basic testing capabilities.
- Enterprise Custom Pricing: Both platforms offer custom pricing for their enterprise plans, acknowledging the unique requirements that larger organizations may have.
Differences:
- Pricing Transparency: Katalon provides a clear starting price for its Premium plan, whereas ACCELQ requires direct contact for pricing on its Enterprise Plan, indicating a more customized approach.
- Focus on Automation: While both platforms support test automation, Katalon places a strong emphasis on AI-powered and visual testing in its advanced plans, which may appeal to teams looking for cutting-edge testing tools.
- On-Premise Deployment: ACCELQ explicitly mentions the availability of both cloud and on-premise deployments, which can be a deciding factor for businesses with strict data governance or privacy requirements.
- Introductory Discounts: Katalon offers special discounts for new customers on initial licenses, a feature not highlighted in ACCELQ’s pricing model.
In summary, while both Katalon and ACCELQ offer flexible and scalable pricing models designed to accommodate a range of testing needs, Katalon is more transparent with its pricing and favors AI-enhanced testing capabilities, whereas ACCELQ emphasizes no-code solutions and provides both cloud and on-premise options, with a slightly less transparent cost structure. Users should consider their specific requirements, such as the need for AI capabilities, no-code environments, deployment options, and budget constraints when choosing between the two platforms.
