Choosing Between CSS and XPath Locators in Selenium

Choosing Between CSS and XPath Locators in Selenium

3 July 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment QA

When working with Selenium for web automation testing, one of the common dilemmas is choosing between CSS and XPath locators. While both have their use cases, understanding their differences and knowing when to use each can significantly impact your testing efficiency and compatibility across different browsers.

Performance and Compatibility

CSS locators generally offer better performance and compatibility, especially in Internet Explorer (IE). XPath locators in IE can be notoriously slow or even fail to function correctly. Therefore, if your testing environment includes IE, CSS locators are the preferable choice.

In contrast, other browsers like Chrome, Firefox, and Safari do not show significant performance differences between CSS and XPath locators. Hence, the choice of locator can be more flexible in these environments.

Browser Environment Considerations

In multi-browser testing environments, it is crucial to ensure that your locators are compatible across all browsers. While CSS locators are generally more reliable in IE, they also work well in other browsers. However, CSS has some limitations in terms of the functionalities it supports. For example, certain CSS selectors like previous item, next item, and counters are not supported in IE.

In such scenarios, it is essential to work closely with your developers to ensure that each element has a distinctive ID. This practice can significantly enhance the performance and reliability of your tests by reducing the need for complex XPath expressions.

When to Use XPath

Despite the advantages of CSS, there are situations where XPath is necessary. For instance, XPath allows you to navigate to the parent of the current node, a feature not available in CSS. Additionally, XPath can be beneficial when you need to ‘back up’ several same-level elements.

In such cases, using relative XPath expressions can help maintain readability and avoid creating brittle tests that break with minor changes in the page structure. For example, instead of using an absolute XPath like //body//div/span/table/tr/td/span[@name='cars'], a relative XPath span[@name='cars'] can be more robust and easier to maintain.

Best Practices

  • Prefer CSS locators for better performance and compatibility, especially in IE.
  • Use distinctive IDs for elements to simplify locator expressions.
  • Employ relative XPath expressions when CSS locators are insufficient.
  • Avoid hardcoding locators that rely on the current page structure.
  • Coordinate with developers to ensure elements are easily identifiable.

Enhancing Your Test Automation

Choosing the right locator strategy is crucial for efficient and reliable test automation. However, managing and maintaining tests can still be challenging. This is where tools like Repeato come in. Repeato is a no-code test automation tool for iOS and Android that leverages computer vision and AI to create, run, and maintain automated tests quickly and efficiently.

By using Repeato, you can streamline your test automation process, reduce the complexity of maintaining locators, and ensure high quality in your mobile applications. For more information on how Repeato can assist in your testing endeavors, visit our documentation or blog for detailed guides and best practices.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from!