5 February 2024 Leave a comment Tool comparisons
In the realm of automated testing, Testsigma and UI Automator present distinct approaches. Testsigma offers a low-code, AI-driven platform for testing across web, Android, and iOS, with a focus on ease of use and comprehensive features like test recording and report generation.
On the other hand, UI Automator is a code-dependent framework tailored for Android, requiring advanced technical knowledge to script UI tests. While Testsigma provides a versatile solution with cloud and on-premise options, UI Automator appeals to developers with its open-source nature for Android-specific testing.
Latest update: 1/31/2024, 5:18:29 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.
Feature comparison of Testsigma and UI Automator
| Feature | Testsigma | UI Automator |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | ✔ | ✔ |
| On Premise | ✔ | ✔ |
| Device Farm | ✔ | – |
| Scheduler | ✔ | – |
| Test Recorder | ✔ | N/A |
| Physical Device Testing | ✔ | N/A |
| No Code | ✔ | – |
| Uses Ai | ✔ | N/A |
| Generates Reports | ✔ | – |
| Uses Computer Vision | N/A | – |
| Platforms | web,Android,iOS | Android |
| Ease Of Use | very easy to learn | requires advanced technical knowledge |
| Is Open Source | – | ✔ |
| Support Included | ✔ | – |
| Review Pros |
– Rapid Test Automation: Users can automate most test cases quickly without needing expertise in specific languages or frameworks. – Customer Support: The support team is highly responsive and easily accessible directly through the platform. – Ease of Use: The platform is user-friendly, requiring minimal training to handle. – Test Step Grouping: This feature streamlines the development of new scripts by grouping test steps. – No-Script Automation: Offers a codeless approach to test automation, making it accessible to non-technical users. – Integration Capabilities: Testsigma allows for seamless integration with various tools, enhancing the automation suite. – Natural Language Processing (NLP): Testsigma uses NLP for test cases, making it intuitive to write tests in plain English. – Accessibility: It caters to users with non-technical backgrounds, allowing them to learn and use the platform effectively. – End-to-End Testing: It supports comprehensive testing, including validation of OTPs via Email and SMS. – Custom Functionality: Users can import custom code to extend functionality when required actions are not available. | N/A |
| Review Cons |
– Limited Database Testing: Currently, Testsigma does not support direct database testing, though some validation can be done using custom functions. – Reporting Features: The reporting capabilities are somewhat limited and could be improved. – Performance Issues: Some users have reported slower execution times and non-functional cloud devices. – End-to-End Testing Complexity: While possible, some users find end-to-end testing to be challenging. – Salesforce Integration: There is a need for improved integration features with Salesforce. – Ticket Tracking: Improvements could be made in how user-raised tickets are tracked. – Desktop Application Automation: Testsigma does not currently support the automation of desktop applications. – Element Inspection Limitations: Some elements cannot be inspected directly, requiring workarounds like Sikuli for interaction. – Occasional Errors: Users have encountered intermittent errors, sometimes due to platform maintenance or upgrades. – Lack of Transparency: There is a need for better communication regarding maintenance and updates that may affect test performance. | N/A |
Pricing Overview of Testsigma and UI Automator
Testsigma Pricing
Testsigma, an AI-driven test automation platform, presents a tiered pricing structure aimed at different user groups. The tiers include:
Free Plan: This plan offers basic testing capabilities, which are sufficient for smaller projects or individual testers. It’s a good starting point for those looking to explore the platform’s features without financial commitment.
Pro Plan: Designed for growing teams, this plan provides unlimited automated testing minutes and supports a wide array of device and browser combinations. It also allows for parallel execution and integrates with a range of popular development tools.
Enterprise Plan: Tailored for large teams and Test Centers of Excellence, the Enterprise plan encompasses advanced security features, unlimited storage, and customizable data retention policies. This plan comes with dedicated support to cater to the complex needs of large-scale operations.
Both the Pro and Enterprise plans necessitate direct contact with the Testsigma sales team to obtain customized pricing, which suggests a flexible approach that considers the unique requirements of each business.
UI Automator Pricing
- Free Plan: UI Automator is a completely free, open-source software. There is no paid tier, making it an accessible option for anyone without budget constraints for automation tools.
Comparison of Pricing Models
When comparing the pricing models of Testsigma and UI Automator, several key differences and common points emerge:
Common Points:
- Free Access: Both Testsigma and UI Automator offer free options. Testsigma provides a Free plan with limited functionality, while UI Automator is entirely open-source and free for all its features.
Differences:
Tiered Structure vs. Open Source: Testsigma employs a tiered pricing model, which includes paid plans that offer expanded features and support. In contrast, UI Automator is open-source and does not have a tiered structure or associated costs.
Custom Pricing: Testsigma requires potential customers to engage with their sales team to receive a customized pricing quote for Pro and Enterprise plans. UI Automator, being free, does not involve any pricing discussions or negotiations.
Support and Services: With Testsigma’s paid plans, users have access to dedicated support and advanced services, a feature absent in UI Automator, which relies on community support due to its open-source nature.
Target Audience: Testsigma’s pricing model is designed to cater to a wide range of users, from individuals and small teams to large enterprises, by scaling its offerings. UI Automator, however, is generally more suited for users comfortable with open-source tools and those who do not require dedicated support.
In summary, Testsigma offers a more traditional business-oriented pricing model with tiered plans that provide enhanced features and support as you move up the tiers. This contrasts with UI Automator’s community-driven, cost-free approach, which may appeal to users with limited budgets or those who prefer open-source software. Each model has its advantages depending on the user’s requirements, expertise level, and budgetary constraints.
