Testsigma vs Ranorex Studio

Testsigma vs Ranorex Studio

5 February 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In the evolving landscape of test automation, Testsigma and Ranorex Studio stand out as leading platforms. Testsigma offers a low-code, AI-driven approach, supporting codeless testing for mobile, web, and API applications, making it very easy to learn and integrate with CI/CD tools.

In contrast, Ranorex Studio provides a no-code solution with a UI-focused testing suite for mobile, web, and desktop apps, requiring some technical knowledge but offering comprehensive cross-platform test suites and computer vision capabilities. Both platforms facilitate efficient quality assurance but differ in their use of AI and ease of use.

Latest update: 1/31/2024, 5:18:29 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.

Feature comparison of Testsigma and Ranorex Studio

FeatureTestsigmaRanorex Studio
Free Plan
On Premise
Device FarmN/A
Test RecorderN/A
Physical Device TestingN/A
No Code
Uses Ai
Generates Reports
Uses Computer VisionN/A
Ease Of Usevery easy to learneasy to learn
Is Open Source
Support Included
Review ProsRapid Test Automation: Users can automate most test cases quickly without needing expertise in specific languages or frameworks.
Customer Support: The support team is highly responsive and easily accessible directly through the platform.
Ease of Use: The platform is user-friendly, requiring minimal training to handle.
Test Step Grouping: This feature streamlines the development of new scripts by grouping test steps.
No-Script Automation: Offers a codeless approach to test automation, making it accessible to non-technical users.
Integration Capabilities: Testsigma allows for seamless integration with various tools, enhancing the automation suite.
Natural Language Processing (NLP): Testsigma uses NLP for test cases, making it intuitive to write tests in plain English.
Accessibility: It caters to users with non-technical backgrounds, allowing them to learn and use the platform effectively.
End-to-End Testing: It supports comprehensive testing, including validation of OTPs via Email and SMS.
Custom Functionality: Users can import custom code to extend functionality when required actions are not available.
– Ranorex Spy tool is effective for identifying and locating XPath, providing an edge over some other automation tools.
– Enables creation of stable automation scripts that are less affected by updates compared to tools like Selenium.
– Powerful tool that can cover almost all types of desktop applications.
– Provides the flexibility to implement code using Ranorex API as well as within Ranorex Studio.
– Offers support for automation of web and mobile applications in addition to desktop apps.
– Ranorex can be cost-effective if the infrastructure and approach are optimized.
– Features easy click and recording capabilities for actions of the tested application.
– Provides a variety of free online training sessions for all experience levels and helpful support.
– Facilitates the transition from manual to automated testing, potentially increasing test coverage and efficiency.
– Simplifies test creation, especially for those with less programming knowledge, and supports cross-browser testing.
Review ConsLimited Database Testing: Currently, Testsigma does not support direct database testing, though some validation can be done using custom functions.
Reporting Features: The reporting capabilities are somewhat limited and could be improved.
Performance Issues: Some users have reported slower execution times and non-functional cloud devices.
End-to-End Testing Complexity: While possible, some users find end-to-end testing to be challenging.
Salesforce Integration: There is a need for improved integration features with Salesforce.
Ticket Tracking: Improvements could be made in how user-raised tickets are tracked.
Desktop Application Automation: Testsigma does not currently support the automation of desktop applications.
Element Inspection Limitations: Some elements cannot be inspected directly, requiring workarounds like Sikuli for interaction.
Occasional Errors: Users have encountered intermittent errors, sometimes due to platform maintenance or upgrades.
Lack of Transparency: There is a need for better communication regarding maintenance and updates that may affect test performance.
– Ranorex only supports C and is limited to Windows, lacking support for Mac OS.
– Some users experience difficulties when recording actions on applications using multiple technologies.
– Some users report receiving no tangible benefits from using Ranorex in certain scenarios.
– The cost of Ranorex can be high, which may be a barrier for smaller teams or businesses.
– Users have reported experiencing persistent bugs and issues within the system over the years.
– Communication with support has been challenging for some users, with difficulties in resolving issues.
– Sales representative turnover can lead to inconsistencies in customer service.
– Reporting functionality in Ranorex is criticized for not scaling well with larger tests.
– While Ranorex is flexible, some users feel that this flexibility is necessary to work around its shortcomings.
– Compatibility with all desired technologies should be thoroughly tested, as some users have found limitations in Ranorex’s ability to interact with certain elements.

Pricing Model Comparison: Testsigma vs. Ranorex Studio

Testsigma Pricing Overview

Testsigma presents a tiered pricing strategy which includes:

  • A Free plan that caters to smaller projects with limited testing requirements.
  • A Pro plan that offers unlimited automated testing minutes and a variety of integrations and execution capabilities, suitable for fast-growing teams.
  • An Enterprise plan that provides advanced features such as enhanced security, unlimited storage, and dedicated support, designed for large organizations or Test Centers of Excellence (TCOEs).
    Both the Pro and Enterprise plans necessitate contacting the sales team to obtain personalized pricing.

Ranorex Studio Pricing Overview

Ranorex Studio employs a license-based pricing model with three main options:

  • The Studio license, which is machine-specific and includes full test creation and execution capabilities, along with development environment integration.
  • The Enterprise license, a floating license allowing for more flexibility across machines and enhancing collaborative capabilities.
  • The Runtime license, also a floating license, intended for executing tests on multiple environments but requires a Studio or Enterprise license for test creation.
    Ranorex emphasizes the inclusion of support services in their pricing and recommends contacting their sales team for detailed pricing information.

Comparison of Pricing Models

Common Points

  • Contact for Pricing: Both Testsigma and Ranorex require potential customers to reach out to their sales team to get detailed pricing information, suggesting a level of customization in their offerings.
  • Tiered Offerings: Each provides multiple tiers or types of licensing to cater to different organizational needs, from smaller projects or teams to large enterprises.
  • Test Automation: Both platforms offer automated testing solutions, with a focus on supporting a wide range of testing methodologies and environments.
  • Integration Capabilities: Integration with other tools and systems is a highlighted feature, allowing for seamless workflows within the development and testing environments.

Key Differences

  • Pricing Structure: Testsigma opts for a tiered plan structure (Free, Pro, Enterprise), while Ranorex uses a license-based approach (Studio, Enterprise, Runtime).
  • Free Plan Availability: Testsigma provides a Free plan for entry-level use, which is not explicitly offered by Ranorex.
  • License Flexibility: Ranorex offers floating licenses (Enterprise and Runtime) which provide flexibility for team usage across multiple machines, contrasting with Testsigma’s model that doesn’t explicitly mention floating or fixed licenses.
  • Customization and Support: Testsigma emphasizes a personalized approach to pricing and support, indicating a potential for greater customization based on client needs. Ranorex also highlights support but focuses more on the type of license in terms of machine allocation and test execution capabilities.
  • Plan Features: Testsigma’s Pro and Enterprise plans boast unlimited testing minutes and storage, which are not specified in Ranorex’s model. Conversely, Ranorex details its IDE and plugin capabilities, which are not explicitly mentioned by Testsigma.

In conclusion, while both Testsigma and Ranorex Studio offer robust solutions for various testing needs, their pricing models cater to different preferences in terms of plan structure, flexibility, and scalability. Users should consider their specific project requirements and team dynamics when choosing between the two platforms.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from!