Choosing the right test automation platform can greatly impact the efficiency and effectiveness of your software testing process. In this article, we compare Testsigma and Leapwork, two prominent players in the test automation arena.
Testsigma offers a low-code, AI-driven environment with a focus on web and mobile applications, boasting features like test recording and physical device testing. Leapwork, on the other hand, is a no-code solution that utilizes visual language and computer vision technology to cater to a range of applications and technologies. Both platforms aim to simplify testing without the need for in-depth coding skills, but they differ in their approach to automation, integration capabilities, and additional features such as device farms and reporting. Join us as we delve into the nuances of each platform to help you determine which may best suit your testing needs.
Latest update: 1/31/2024, 5:18:29 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.
Feature comparison of Leapwork and Testsigma
|Uses Computer Vision
|Ease Of Use
|very easy to learn
|very easy to learn
|Is Open Source
– Comprehensive data storage abilities without being locked into a single solution.
– Excellent support with timely solutions upon request.
– Ease of use in creating subflows for reusable tasks, which benefits non-technical testers.
– Enables manual testers to create automation without extensive coding knowledge.
– GUI-based platform that is easy to learn with a supportive knowledge base.
– No technical prerequisites required for use.
– In-depth strategy editor that supports web, desktop, and API automation.
– Seamless integration of test cases involving both desktop and web applications.
– Video export feature of executed test cases for documentation and training.
– Excellent debugging functionality, including live video execution and video recording.
– Rapid Test Automation: Users can automate most test cases quickly without needing expertise in specific languages or frameworks.
– Customer Support: The support team is highly responsive and easily accessible directly through the platform.
– Ease of Use: The platform is user-friendly, requiring minimal training to handle.
– Test Step Grouping: This feature streamlines the development of new scripts by grouping test steps.
– No-Script Automation: Offers a codeless approach to test automation, making it accessible to non-technical users.
– Integration Capabilities: Testsigma allows for seamless integration with various tools, enhancing the automation suite.
– Natural Language Processing (NLP): Testsigma uses NLP for test cases, making it intuitive to write tests in plain English.
– Accessibility: It caters to users with non-technical backgrounds, allowing them to learn and use the platform effectively.
– End-to-End Testing: It supports comprehensive testing, including validation of OTPs via Email and SMS.
– Custom Functionality: Users can import custom code to extend functionality when required actions are not available.
– Minor user interface issues, such as watermarks not disappearing when typing.
– Lack of check-in control in the Platform version compared to the Enterprise version.
– Reporting features could be enhanced, such as email reports and dashboard improvements.
– Identifying some web elements can be counterintuitive and may require advanced knowledge.
– Mobile automation not built-in; reliance on third-party providers or tools is necessary.
– Test execution can be slow when using remote agents.
– Limited functionality for executing sub-flows compared to main flows.
– Data-driven test automation from Excel is not dynamic and could be improved.
– Limited Excel integration with only basic Read and Write blocks available.
– Still an on-premises tool; could benefit from being cloud-based with automated backups and disaster recovery.
– Limited Database Testing: Currently, Testsigma does not support direct database testing, though some validation can be done using custom functions.
– Reporting Features: The reporting capabilities are somewhat limited and could be improved.
– Performance Issues: Some users have reported slower execution times and non-functional cloud devices.
– End-to-End Testing Complexity: While possible, some users find end-to-end testing to be challenging.
– Salesforce Integration: There is a need for improved integration features with Salesforce.
– Ticket Tracking: Improvements could be made in how user-raised tickets are tracked.
– Desktop Application Automation: Testsigma does not currently support the automation of desktop applications.
– Element Inspection Limitations: Some elements cannot be inspected directly, requiring workarounds like Sikuli for interaction.
– Occasional Errors: Users have encountered intermittent errors, sometimes due to platform maintenance or upgrades.
– Lack of Transparency: There is a need for better communication regarding maintenance and updates that may affect test performance.
Pricing Comparison: Testsigma vs. Leapwork
Testsigma: A Tiered Approach to Test Automation Pricing
Testsigma presents a tiered pricing strategy with three distinct offerings: a Free tier, a Pro plan, and an Enterprise plan. Each tier is designed to cater to different team sizes and testing requirements.
- Free Plan: Targets smaller projects with limited testing needs.
- Pro Plan: Serves fast-growing teams, offering unlimited automated testing minutes, a wide range of device and browser combinations, as well as parallel execution. It also includes integration capabilities with popular tools.
- Enterprise Plan: Aimed at large teams and Test Centers of Excellence (TCOEs), featuring advanced security measures, unlimited storage, custom data retention policies, and dedicated support.
Pricing for the Pro and Enterprise plans is not publicly listed and requires contact with the Testsigma sales team for a customized quote.
Leapwork: Customized Pricing for Every Scale
Leapwork also adopts a customized pricing model, but without predefined tiers. Instead, Leapwork offers a more flexible approach, inviting potential users to discuss their specific automation needs to receive a personalized pricing plan.
- Custom Pricing: Leapwork’s pricing model is fully customizable and encourages potential users to engage in a dialogue to ensure the pricing plan suits their particular business requirements and team structures.
Key Differences and Commonalities in Pricing Models
- Customized Pricing: Both Testsigma and Leapwork require interested parties to inquire about pricing for their higher-tier services, ensuring a tailored experience that fits the unique needs of each business.
- Direct Contact for Quotes: Customers must reach out directly to the sales teams of both products to discuss their requirements and receive a personalized price quote.
- Solution-Oriented Approach: The emphasis is on providing a solution that aligns with the customer’s objectives and the complexity of their testing scenarios.
- Tiered vs. Fully Customizable: Testsigma offers predefined tiers with set features, while Leapwork operates solely on a fully customizable pricing model without fixed tiers.
- Free Tier Availability: Testsigma provides a Free plan for users with basic needs, a feature that Leapwork does not publicly advertise.
- Plan Transparency: Testsigma outlines the features available in each plan, whereas Leapwork focuses on the customizability of their pricing without detailing specific plan structures.
While both Testsigma and Leapwork share a commitment to providing customized pricing plans, they differ in their approach. Testsigma offers a clear tiered structure with a Free option for basic testing needs, appealing to businesses looking for a clear starting point. Leapwork, on the other hand, emphasizes a more fluid pricing strategy that adapts to any scale, catering to businesses that prefer a bespoke pricing model without predefined tiers. Potential customers should consider the level of customization they require and the transparency of plan features when choosing between these test automation platforms.