testRigor vs TestComplete

testRigor vs TestComplete

1 February 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In the quest for efficient software testing solutions, testRigor and TestComplete have emerged as notable contenders. testRigor, an AI-based no-code platform, facilitates test creation in plain English, making it accessible for non-technical users and supporting web, mobile, and API testing.


It’s known for integrating with device farms and generating comprehensive reports. Conversely, TestComplete was a script-based and scriptless UI testing tool with AI-powered object recognition, but it was discontinued in 2023, limiting its future usability. This comparison will elucidate the core differences to help you decide the best tool for your needs.


Latest update: 1/31/2024, 3:45:26 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.


Feature comparison of testRigor and TestComplete

FeaturetestRigorTestComplete
Free Plan
On PremiseN/A
Device Farm
SchedulerN/A
Generates Reports
Uses Computer VisionN/AN/A
No Code
Uses Ai
Platformsweb,Android,iOSweb,Android,iOS
Ease Of Usevery easy to learneasy to learn
Is Open Source
Support Included
Review Pros 1. Allows writing and generating test scripts using plain English statements.
2. Offers integration with various tools such as JIRA and TestRail.
3. Capable of running tests on multiple browsers and devices simultaneously.
4. Features automatic test script generation, saving time and effort.
5. Provides efficient customer support, ensuring ease of use and implementation.
6. Eliminates the need for learning different programming languages or testing frameworks.
7. Enables the entire team to write end-to-end UI tests quickly without programming knowledge.
8. Generates human-readable test scripts that are easily understandable by anyone.
9. Automates test cases in a very short span of time.
10. Serves as a scalable solution for building a software testing process in non-software companies.
N/A
Review Cons 1. The tool has been reported to crash occasionally, leading to more test case failures.
2. The cost of server resources may be a concern for some users.
3. Lacks educational materials to help improve QA efficiency for companies with less experience.
4. Some users have experienced issues with server responsiveness.
5. Initial challenges may be faced by companies with a limited QA team and lack of software testing knowledge.
N/A


Understanding the Pricing Models of Test Automation Tools

In the realm of software test automation, choosing the right tool is critical for ensuring quality and efficiency. For this comparison, we’ll look at the pricing model of one such tool: testRigor.

testRigor Pricing Overview

testRigor offers a tiered pricing structure to accommodate a range of user needs and organizational scales:

  • Free Plan: Targeted at open-source projects, this plan provides unlimited users, cases, and suites. However, tests and results are publicly visible, which may not be suitable for proprietary or sensitive projects.
  • Private Plan: Starting at $900 per month, the Private plan includes a 14-day trial and offers private tests. Users can also purchase additional parallelizations to speed up test execution.
  • Enterprise Plan: Tailored for larger organizations, this plan features custom pricing. It includes a dedicated manager, Slack support, and the option for on-premise deployment.

All plans allow for unlimited users and test cases, demonstrating testRigor’s commitment to scalability and collaboration.

Comparing Pricing Models

Since the second product, TestComplete, does not have available pricing information, we will focus on analyzing the common points and differences within the pricing models of testRigor itself.

Common Points Across testRigor Plans:

  • Unlimited Users: Every plan from testRigor allows an unlimited number of users, which is beneficial for teams of any size and helps to promote collaboration without additional costs.
  • Unlimited Test Cases: There is no limit on the number of test cases users can create, which is advantageous for comprehensive testing without worrying about hitting ceilings that could impede progress.
  • Scalability: The tiered nature of testRigor’s pricing ensures that organizations can start with a plan that suits their current needs and scale up as they grow.

Differences Between testRigor Plans:

  • Visibility of Tests and Results: The Free plan requires tests and results to be public, which could be a deal-breaker for projects requiring confidentiality. The Private and Enterprise plans offer the necessary privacy.
  • Pricing Structure: The Free plan is, as the name suggests, free of cost, making it accessible for open-source projects. The Private plan introduces a monthly fee with additional costs for extra parallelizations, while the Enterprise plan shifts to custom pricing to accommodate more extensive needs and support.
  • Support and Deployment Options: Only the Enterprise plan mentions a dedicated manager and Slack support, indicating a higher level of service. Additionally, the possibility of on-premise deployment with the Enterprise plan can be crucial for organizations with stringent security requirements.

In conclusion, testRigor’s pricing model is designed to serve a diverse user base, from small open-source teams to large enterprises. The key differences lie in the level of privacy, support, and customization available, allowing businesses to select the plan that best aligns with their testing requirements and growth trajectory.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from.