1 February 2024 Leave a comment Tool comparisons
In the bustling landscape of test automation, testRigor and Shot emerge as distinct solutions catering to different needs. testRigor, an AI-powered, no-code tool, simplifies test creation in plain English, supporting web, mobile, and API testing.
It’s designed for ease of use, even for non-technical users. In contrast, Shot is a specialized tool for Android’s UI consistency, requiring technical know-how, and is tailored for developers familiar with Gradle and Jetpack Compose. This comparison will dissect their unique features, from testRigor’s broad platform support to Shot’s focused approach on Android screenshot testing.
Latest update: 1/31/2024, 3:45:26 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.
Feature comparison of testRigor and Shot
| Feature | testRigor | Shot |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | ✔ | ✔ |
| On Premise | ✔ | ✔ |
| Device Farm | ✔ | – |
| Scheduler | ✔ | – |
| Generates Reports | ✔ | ✔ |
| Uses Computer Vision | N/A | ✔ |
| No Code | ✔ | – |
| Uses Ai | ✔ | – |
| Platforms | web,Android,iOS | Android |
| Ease Of Use | very easy to learn | requires expert technical knowledge |
| Is Open Source | – | ✔ |
| Support Included | ✔ | – |
| Review Pros |
1. Allows writing and generating test scripts using plain English statements. 2. Offers integration with various tools such as JIRA and TestRail. 3. Capable of running tests on multiple browsers and devices simultaneously. 4. Features automatic test script generation, saving time and effort. 5. Provides efficient customer support, ensuring ease of use and implementation. 6. Eliminates the need for learning different programming languages or testing frameworks. 7. Enables the entire team to write end-to-end UI tests quickly without programming knowledge. 8. Generates human-readable test scripts that are easily understandable by anyone. 9. Automates test cases in a very short span of time. 10. Serves as a scalable solution for building a software testing process in non-software companies. | N/A |
| Review Cons |
1. The tool has been reported to crash occasionally, leading to more test case failures. 2. The cost of server resources may be a concern for some users. 3. Lacks educational materials to help improve QA efficiency for companies with less experience. 4. Some users have experienced issues with server responsiveness. 5. Initial challenges may be faced by companies with a limited QA team and lack of software testing knowledge. | N/A |
Pricing Model Comparison: testRigor vs. Shot
testRigor Pricing Overview
testRigor, a test automation tool, adopts a tiered pricing model designed to accommodate various user needs. The Free plan caters to open-source projects and provides unlimited users, test cases, and suites, albeit with public visibility of tests and results. For teams requiring confidentiality, the Private plan starts at $900 per month and offers private tests, along with the option to purchase additional parallelizations for faster test execution. This plan also includes a 14-day trial period. Large organizations can opt for the Enterprise plan, which offers custom pricing and features such as a dedicated account manager, Slack support, and the possibility of on-premise deployment. All plans feature unlimited users and test cases.
Shot Pricing Overview
Shot is presented as free open-source software, implying that there are no direct costs associated with its use. Typically, open-source software allows unlimited access to the software’s features and capabilities, and it’s often maintained and updated by a community of contributors.
Comparison of Pricing Models
Common Points:
- Accessibility for Open-Source Projects: Both testRigor and Shot offer solutions that are friendly to open-source projects. testRigor provides a Free plan with unlimited access, albeit with public results, while Shot is entirely open-source and free.
- Unlimited Users: testRigor allows an unlimited number of users across all its plans, which is a common trait in open-source software like Shot.
Key Differences:
- Tiered Pricing vs. Free Use: testRigor uses a tiered pricing system with escalating benefits and costs, whereas Shot is free, making it accessible to anyone without any financial investment.
- Privacy and Additional Features: The Private and Enterprise plans of testRigor offer additional privacy for tests and results, which is a contrast to the typically public nature of open-source software. Moreover, testRigor provides premium features such as dedicated support and potential on-premise deployment, which may not be available with Shot.
- Support and Services: testRigor’s paid plans include professional support options like a dedicated manager and Slack support, which are not standard for free open-source software like Shot. Support for open-source software often relies on community forums and volunteer contributions.
- Custom Pricing for Large Enterprises: testRigor offers custom pricing for its Enterprise plan to cater to the specific needs of large organizations, a feature that doesn’t apply to Shot as it is freely available.
In essence, testRigor and Shot cater to different segments of users. testRigor provides a structured pricing model that scales with the size and needs of a project or organization, offering privacy and additional features for those willing to invest. Shot, on the other hand, represents the quintessential open-source model, emphasizing free access and community-driven development, which may appeal to individuals or organizations with limited budgets or those who prefer community support over dedicated professional services.
