1 February 2024 Leave a comment Tool comparisons
In the world of software testing, choosing the right automation tool can be pivotal. testRigor and Sauce Labs stand out, but serve distinct needs.
testRigor, an AI-based, no-code platform, simplifies test creation with plain English, ideal for teams with limited technical skills. It offers a free plan and integrates with third-party device farms. On the other hand, Sauce Labs provides a comprehensive suite with real device clouds and computer vision for developers and testers aiming for extensive platform coverage, though it lacks a free tier. Both tools prioritize ease of use and support a variety of platforms.
Latest update: 1/31/2024, 3:45:26 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.
Feature comparison of testRigor and Sauce Labs
| Feature | testRigor | Sauce Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | ✔ | – |
| On Premise | ✔ | ✔ |
| Device Farm | ✔ | ✔ |
| Scheduler | ✔ | N/A |
| Generates Reports | ✔ | ✔ |
| Uses Computer Vision | N/A | ✔ |
| No Code | ✔ | ✔ |
| Uses Ai | ✔ | ✔ |
| Platforms | web,Android,iOS | web,Android,iOS |
| Ease Of Use | very easy to learn | easy to learn |
| Is Open Source | – | – |
| Support Included | ✔ | ✔ |
| Review Pros |
1. Allows writing and generating test scripts using plain English statements. 2. Offers integration with various tools such as JIRA and TestRail. 3. Capable of running tests on multiple browsers and devices simultaneously. 4. Features automatic test script generation, saving time and effort. 5. Provides efficient customer support, ensuring ease of use and implementation. 6. Eliminates the need for learning different programming languages or testing frameworks. 7. Enables the entire team to write end-to-end UI tests quickly without programming knowledge. 8. Generates human-readable test scripts that are easily understandable by anyone. 9. Automates test cases in a very short span of time. 10. Serves as a scalable solution for building a software testing process in non-software companies. |
1. Easy to integrate with existing codebases, enhancing the adaptability for teams. 2. Offers a high degree of versatility for testing across different browsers, devices, and platforms. 3. Provides an intuitive user interface that is frequently updated based on user feedback. 4. Regularly introduces new features and improvements to the service. 5. Boasts a supportive community for troubleshooting and user assistance. 6. Enables effective cross-browser and cross-platform testing without complex setups. 7. Supports the latest web browsers and mobile operating systems for both forward and backward compatibility testing. 8. Facilitates parallel execution, allowing numerous instances to run simultaneously, which significantly reduces test suite execution time. 9. Features video recordings of tests to help identify where failures occur. 10. Includes a platform configurator to assist in running test suites on real mobile applications. |
| Review Cons |
1. The tool has been reported to crash occasionally, leading to more test case failures. 2. The cost of server resources may be a concern for some users. 3. Lacks educational materials to help improve QA efficiency for companies with less experience. 4. Some users have experienced issues with server responsiveness. 5. Initial challenges may be faced by companies with a limited QA team and lack of software testing knowledge. |
1. The cost can be high due to the reliance on virtual machines. 2. Users may occasionally encounter server errors. 3. Customer support response times can be slow. 4. Frequent changes in account managers can disrupt service continuity. 5. Lacks an option to export test reports in formats such as TestNG, Cucumber, and Extent directly from Sauce Labs. 6. The process of copying usernames and passwords from the profile can be cumbersome. 7. Errors during testing can occur, requiring users to rely on video features for debugging. 8. Does not provide email triage for report notifications of test suites. 9. Running real mobile device tests with the same web browser suite can present challenges. 10. The time taken for script execution can be a concern for some users. |
Pricing Overview of testRigor and Sauce Labs
testRigor Pricing Summary
testRigor provides a scalable tiered pricing model designed to accommodate a broad spectrum of users, from individuals working on open-source projects to large enterprises. The Free plan offers the basics with public visibility, while the Private plan at $900 per month adds privacy and enhanced features, including a 14-day trial and the option for faster test execution through additional parallelizations. The Enterprise plan is tailored to large organizations with custom pricing, a dedicated manager, Slack support, and possibly on-premise deployment. All plans include unlimited users and test cases.
Sauce Labs Pricing Summary
Sauce Labs also adopts a tiered pricing model with its Continuous Testing Cloud, starting with the “Live Testing” plan at $39 per month for manual testing. The “Virtual Cloud” plan, at $149 per month, introduces automated testing, and the “Real Device Cloud” plan at $199 per month provides access to real mobile devices. All these plans include one parallel test and unlimited users, with the flexibility of monthly or annual billing. Enterprise solutions are available with premium features on request. Sauce Labs accommodates open-source projects with free accounts and charges for overages on minute-limited plans.
Comparison of Pricing Models
The pricing structures of testRigor and Sauce Labs share some common traits while also exhibiting significant differences:
Common Points:
- Tiered Pricing: Both services offer tiered pricing structures, ensuring a fit for various user needs, from individual developers to large enterprises.
- Unlimited Users: Each platform allows an unlimited number of users on all plans, promoting collaboration and scalability.
- Support for Open Source: Both companies provide support for open-source projects, acknowledging the importance of community-driven development.
- Enterprise Customization: Tailored enterprise solutions are available with both services, offering more personalized support and features for larger organizations.
Differences:
- Free Plan Offering: testRigor offers a Free plan with unlimited cases and suites, whereas Sauce Labs does not advertise a free tier for unlimited testing.
- Trial Period: testRigor includes a 14-day trial with its Private plan, whereas Sauce Labs does not specifically mention a trial period for its paid plans.
- Test Execution Speed: testRigor’s option to purchase additional parallelizations for faster execution contrasts with Sauce Labs, where each plan includes only one parallel test by default, with additional costs for more.
- Billing Options: Sauce Labs offers both monthly and annual billing, providing flexibility in payment frequency, while testRigor’s pricing details on billing frequencies are not specified.
- Overage Charges: Sauce Labs specifies overage costs of $0.20 per minute for minute-limited plans, whereas testRigor does not mention overages, implying that their plans may not have such usage limitations.
In summary, while both testRigor and Sauce Labs cater to a range of testing requirements with tiered pricing models, the key differences lie in their offerings of free plans, trial periods, test execution options, billing flexibility, and overage charges. Potential customers should consider these factors based on their specific needs and testing volume when choosing between the two services.
