testRigor vs Ranorex Studio

testRigor vs Ranorex Studio

1 February 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In the competitive landscape of test automation tools, testRigor and Ranorex Studio stand out for their unique capabilities. testRigor, an AI-powered, no-code solution, excels in enabling tests in plain English, ideal for non-technical users, and provides seamless integration with device farms.

On the other hand, Ranorex Studio offers a comprehensive suite for detailed UI testing, leveraging computer vision and supporting various technologies. Understanding the differences in AI utilization, ease of use, and technical requirements between these tools is crucial for teams making an informed choice in optimizing their testing workflow.

Latest update: 1/31/2024, 3:45:26 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.

Feature comparison of testRigor and Ranorex Studio

FeaturetestRigorRanorex Studio
Free Plan
On Premise
Device FarmN/A
Generates Reports
Uses Computer VisionN/A
No Code
Uses Ai
Ease Of Usevery easy to learneasy to learn
Is Open Source
Support Included
Review Pros 1. Allows writing and generating test scripts using plain English statements.
2. Offers integration with various tools such as JIRA and TestRail.
3. Capable of running tests on multiple browsers and devices simultaneously.
4. Features automatic test script generation, saving time and effort.
5. Provides efficient customer support, ensuring ease of use and implementation.
6. Eliminates the need for learning different programming languages or testing frameworks.
7. Enables the entire team to write end-to-end UI tests quickly without programming knowledge.
8. Generates human-readable test scripts that are easily understandable by anyone.
9. Automates test cases in a very short span of time.
10. Serves as a scalable solution for building a software testing process in non-software companies.
1. Ranorex Spy tool is effective for identifying and locating XPath, providing an edge over some other automation tools.
2. Enables creation of stable automation scripts that are less affected by updates compared to tools like Selenium.
3. Powerful tool that can cover almost all types of desktop applications.
4. Provides the flexibility to implement code using Ranorex API as well as within Ranorex Studio.
5. Offers support for automation of web and mobile applications in addition to desktop apps.
6. Ranorex can be cost-effective if the infrastructure and approach are optimized.
7. Features easy click and recording capabilities for actions of the tested application.
8. Provides a variety of free online training sessions for all experience levels and helpful support.
9. Facilitates the transition from manual to automated testing, potentially increasing test coverage and efficiency.
10. Simplifies test creation, especially for those with less programming knowledge, and supports cross-browser testing.
Review Cons 1. The tool has been reported to crash occasionally, leading to more test case failures.
2. The cost of server resources may be a concern for some users.
3. Lacks educational materials to help improve QA efficiency for companies with less experience.
4. Some users have experienced issues with server responsiveness.
5. Initial challenges may be faced by companies with a limited QA team and lack of software testing knowledge.
1. Ranorex only supports C and is limited to Windows, lacking support for Mac OS.
2. Some users experience difficulties when recording actions on applications using multiple technologies.
3. Some users report receiving no tangible benefits from using Ranorex in certain scenarios.
4. The cost of Ranorex can be high, which may be a barrier for smaller teams or businesses.
5. Users have reported experiencing persistent bugs and issues within the system over the years.
6. Communication with support has been challenging for some users, with difficulties in resolving issues.
7. Sales representative turnover can lead to inconsistencies in customer service.
8. Reporting functionality in Ranorex is criticized for not scaling well with larger tests.
9. While Ranorex is flexible, some users feel that this flexibility is necessary to work around its shortcomings.
10. Compatibility with all desired technologies should be thoroughly tested, as some users have found limitations in Ranorex’s ability to interact with certain elements.

Pricing Overview of testRigor and Ranorex Studio

testRigor Pricing Description

testRigor offers a tiered pricing structure to accommodate various user needs. The Free plan is tailored for open-source projects, providing unlimited users, cases, and suites, albeit with public visibility. The Private plan begins at $900 monthly, adding privacy for tests and the option for more rapid test execution through additional parallelizations. The Enterprise plan is customized for larger organizations, offering dedicated management and support, with potential onsite deployment options. All plans emphasize unlimited users and test cases.

Ranorex Studio Pricing Description

Ranorex Studio employs an all-inclusive licensing model with three primary licenses: Studio, Enterprise, and Runtime. The Studio license is for individual users on a single machine, offering full test creation and execution capabilities. The Enterprise license is a floating license suitable for team use across multiple machines, both physical and virtual. The Runtime license, also floating, is for executing tests on various machines but does not include test creation capabilities. Ranorex highlights its comprehensive support services and testing features for web, desktop, and mobile, encouraging direct contact for pricing details.

Comparison of Pricing Models

When comparing the pricing models of testRigor and Ranorex Studio, several commonalities and differences arise:

Common Points:

  • Tiered Structures: Both offer tiered options to cater to different sizes and types of users, from individuals to large organizations.
  • Unlimited Access: Each provides plans that include unlimited test cases, ensuring scalability for growing testing requirements.
  • Enterprise Solutions: Customized enterprise options are available with both tools, providing enhanced support and features for larger teams.

Key Differences:

  • Pricing Transparency: testRigor discloses specific pricing for its lower-tier plans, while Ranorex requires direct contact for pricing details.
  • License Flexibility: Ranorex’s licenses vary between fixed (Studio) and floating (Enterprise and Runtime), whereas testRigor’s plans seem to offer more flexibility with unlimited users across all plans.
  • Initial Investment: testRigor’s entry-level Private plan requires a monthly fee, whereas Ranorex’s pricing structure might be more upfront but potentially offers more long-term value depending on the type of license purchased.
  • Support and Deployment: testRigor’s Enterprise plan includes a dedicated manager and potential on-premise deployment, which might appeal to organizations with specific support and infrastructure needs. Ranorex focuses on extensive support services across all its licenses.
  • Free Option: testRigor provides a Free plan for open-source projects, while Ranorex does not publicly list a free or trial option, though trial options may be available upon request.

In conclusion, testRigor is ideal for users seeking clear, tiered pricing with a free entry point for open-source projects, whereas Ranorex caters to users who prioritize robust support services and require flexible licensing options for teams and machines. Potential customers should carefully consider their specific testing needs, team sizes, and budget constraints when choosing between the two pricing models.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from!