testRigor vs Mobot

testRigor vs Mobot

1 February 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In the dynamic world of automated testing, testRigor and Mobot stand out with unique approaches. testRigor offers a no-code, AI-powered platform that simplifies test creation in plain English, suitable for various testing environments and compliance needs.


On the other hand, Mobot leverages AI-driven, mechanical robots for physical mobile app testing, providing a fully managed QA solution. Both cater to ease of use but differ in execution; testRigor integrates with device farms and supports scheduling, while Mobot employs computer vision for real-device interaction, without the need for on-premise deployment.


Latest update: 1/31/2024, 3:45:26 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.


Feature comparison of testRigor and Mobot

FeaturetestRigorMobot
Free Plan
On Premise
Device Farm
Scheduler
Generates Reports
Uses Computer VisionN/A
No Code
Uses Ai
Platformsweb,Android,iOSweb,Android,iOS
Ease Of Usevery easy to learnvery easy to learn
Is Open Source
Support Included
Review Pros 1. Allows writing and generating test scripts using plain English statements.
2. Offers integration with various tools such as JIRA and TestRail.
3. Capable of running tests on multiple browsers and devices simultaneously.
4. Features automatic test script generation, saving time and effort.
5. Provides efficient customer support, ensuring ease of use and implementation.
6. Eliminates the need for learning different programming languages or testing frameworks.
7. Enables the entire team to write end-to-end UI tests quickly without programming knowledge.
8. Generates human-readable test scripts that are easily understandable by anyone.
9. Automates test cases in a very short span of time.
10. Serves as a scalable solution for building a software testing process in non-software companies.
N/A
Review Cons 1. The tool has been reported to crash occasionally, leading to more test case failures.
2. The cost of server resources may be a concern for some users.
3. Lacks educational materials to help improve QA efficiency for companies with less experience.
4. Some users have experienced issues with server responsiveness.
5. Initial challenges may be faced by companies with a limited QA team and lack of software testing knowledge.
N/A


Pricing Model Comparison: testRigor vs. Mobot

testRigor Pricing Overview

testRigor Test Automation Tool adopts a tiered pricing structure with three distinct plans:

  • Free Plan: Suited for open-source projects, providing unlimited users, cases, and suites with public visibility.
  • Private Plan: Starting at $900/month, this plan includes a 14-day trial, private tests, and the option for additional parallelizations.
  • Enterprise Plan: Offers custom pricing, a dedicated manager, Slack support, and possible on-premise deployment.

All plans allow unlimited users and test cases, making the service scalable for different testing requirements.

Mobot Pricing Overview

Mobot also features a tiered pricing model, each designed for specific team roles:

  • Mobot Live: Tailored for QA engineers, starting at $249/month for one parallel test, with the cost scaling with the number of parallel tests.
  • Mobot Managed: Geared towards engineering teams, starting at $1,999/month, providing a fully managed testing service.
  • Mobot Insights: Aimed at marketing and product teams, starting at $1,999/month, including campaign monitoring and reports.

Each Mobot tier includes access to over 300 mobile devices and premium support, with free trials offered.

Comparing Pricing Models

Commonalities:

  • Both testRigor and Mobot employ a tiered pricing model that scales with the user’s needs.
  • Each offers a free trial period to test the service before committing financially.
  • The availability of unlimited users and test cases is common in testRigor’s plans, which may appeal to teams of varying sizes.

Differences:

  • Pricing Tiers: testRigor provides a free plan for open-source projects, whereas Mobot’s lowest tier starts at $249/month.
  • Plan Focus: testRigor’s plans are primarily differentiated by privacy and execution speed, while Mobot’s tiers are tailored to specific team functions (QA, engineering, marketing/product).
  • Additional Features: testRigor’s Enterprise plan mentions potential for on-premise deployment and Slack support, which is not explicitly offered in any of Mobot’s plans.
  • Parallel Testing: testRigor allows for the purchase of additional parallelizations, while Mobot includes parallel tests in its pricing and scales the cost accordingly.
  • Device Access: Mobot explicitly promises access to over 300 mobile devices across all its plans, a feature not specified in testRigor’s description.

Through this comparison, readers should note that the key differences in the pricing models of testRigor and Mobot lie in the structure of their tiers and the specific features and services offered within those tiers. testRigor leans towards privacy and speed customization, while Mobot emphasizes role-specific features and a vast device library. Users should consider their team’s scale, role-specific needs, and budget when choosing between these two testing service providers.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from.