1 February 2024 Leave a comment Tool comparisons
In the rapidly evolving landscape of test automation, testRigor and Flank offer distinct approaches to quality assurance. testRigor is a no-code, AI-powered tool that simplifies test creation in plain English, making it accessible for non-technical users and providing integrations with device farms for comprehensive testing across web and mobile platforms.
On the other hand, Flank is an open-source test runner leveraging parallel execution and Firebase Test Lab integration, designed for those with technical expertise in Android and iOS environments. Understanding their differences is key for teams to choose the right tool for their testing needs.
Latest update: 1/31/2024, 3:45:26 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.
Feature comparison of testRigor and Flank
| Feature | testRigor | Flank |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | ✔ | ✔ |
| On Premise | ✔ | ✔ |
| Device Farm | ✔ | – |
| Scheduler | ✔ | – |
| Generates Reports | ✔ | ✔ |
| Uses Computer Vision | N/A | – |
| No Code | ✔ | – |
| Uses Ai | ✔ | – |
| Platforms | web,Android,iOS | Android,iOS |
| Ease Of Use | very easy to learn | requires expert technical knowledge |
| Is Open Source | – | ✔ |
| Support Included | ✔ | – |
| Review Pros |
1. Allows writing and generating test scripts using plain English statements. 2. Offers integration with various tools such as JIRA and TestRail. 3. Capable of running tests on multiple browsers and devices simultaneously. 4. Features automatic test script generation, saving time and effort. 5. Provides efficient customer support, ensuring ease of use and implementation. 6. Eliminates the need for learning different programming languages or testing frameworks. 7. Enables the entire team to write end-to-end UI tests quickly without programming knowledge. 8. Generates human-readable test scripts that are easily understandable by anyone. 9. Automates test cases in a very short span of time. 10. Serves as a scalable solution for building a software testing process in non-software companies. | N/A |
| Review Cons |
1. The tool has been reported to crash occasionally, leading to more test case failures. 2. The cost of server resources may be a concern for some users. 3. Lacks educational materials to help improve QA efficiency for companies with less experience. 4. Some users have experienced issues with server responsiveness. 5. Initial challenges may be faced by companies with a limited QA team and lack of software testing knowledge. | N/A |
Overview of Pricing Models for testRigor and Flank
testRigor Pricing Description
testRigor, a test automation tool, employs a tiered pricing model designed to accommodate various user needs. The Free plan targets open-source projects, providing unlimited users, cases, and suites with the caveat that tests and results are publicly visible. Users seeking privacy and additional features can opt for the Private plan, which starts at $900 per month and includes a 14-day trial, private tests, and the ability to add extra parallelizations for faster execution. Large-scale organizations can take advantage of the Enterprise plan, which offers custom pricing and includes a dedicated manager, Slack support, and the possibility of on-premise deployment. A key aspect of testRigor’s pricing structure is that all plans include unlimited users and test cases.
Flank Pricing Description
Flank is positioned as a free open-source software. This implies that there is no cost to download, use, or modify the software, making it accessible for individuals and organizations of all sizes. The open-source nature of Flank also allows for community contributions, which can enhance the tool’s capabilities over time.
Comparison of Pricing Models
Common Points:
- Accessibility for Open-Source Projects: Both testRigor and Flank provide options that cater to open-source projects. testRigor offers a Free plan with unlimited access, albeit with public visibility, while Flank is entirely free and open-source.
- Unlimited Access: testRigor provides unlimited users and test cases across all its plans, which is somewhat mirrored in Flank’s open-source model allowing unlimited use without any direct cost.
Key Differences:
- Cost Structure: The most evident difference is the cost structure. testRigor utilizes a tiered pricing model with a Free, Private, and Enterprise plan, each with increasing levels of privacy, features, and support. In contrast, Flank is completely free, with no tiers or paid options.
- Privacy and Features: With testRigor, moving from the Free to Private plan offers enhanced privacy and features at a cost. Flank, being open-source, does not have built-in privacy levels or paid features but relies on the community for enhancements.
- Support and Services: testRigor’s paid plans include professional support services, such as a dedicated manager and Slack support, which are not standard offerings in most free open-source tools like Flank.
- Flexibility for Large Organizations: testRigor’s Enterprise plan is tailored for large organizations with custom pricing and potential on-premise deployment options. Flank, while free and modifiable, does not offer bespoke service agreements or dedicated support for enterprise-scale deployment.
- Trial Period: testRigor offers a 14-day trial for its Private plan, allowing potential customers to evaluate the tool’s features. As an open-source software, Flank does not require a trial period as users can test and assess the software freely at any time.
Conclusion
In summary, testRigor’s tiered pricing model offers scalability with a mix of free and paid plans that include additional features and privacy options. It caters to various organizational sizes with professional support services. Flank, on the other hand, is entirely free and community-driven, appealing to those who prioritize open-source software and are perhaps more cost-sensitive. Users should consider their specific needs for privacy, support, scalability, and budget when choosing between these two testing tools.
