testRigor vs Appium

testRigor vs Appium

1 February 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In the ever-evolving landscape of automated testing, two prominent tools emerge: testRigor and Appium. testRigor, an AI-driven, no-code platform, simplifies test automation by allowing users to write tests in plain English, making it highly accessible for non-technical users.

On the other hand, Appium is an open-source framework that demands more technical expertise, offering extensive language support and cross-platform testing for web, Android, and iOS. This comparison will examine their distinct approaches to automation, exploring how testRigor’s user-friendly interface stacks up against Appium’s flexible, code-driven environment.

Latest update: 1/31/2024, 3:45:26 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.

Feature comparison of testRigor and Appium

Free Plan
On Premise
Device Farm
Generates Reports
Uses Computer VisionN/A
No Code
Uses Ai
Ease Of Usevery easy to learnrequires expert technical knowledge
Is Open Source
Support Included
Review Pros 1. Allows writing and generating test scripts using plain English statements.
2. Offers integration with various tools such as JIRA and TestRail.
3. Capable of running tests on multiple browsers and devices simultaneously.
4. Features automatic test script generation, saving time and effort.
5. Provides efficient customer support, ensuring ease of use and implementation.
6. Eliminates the need for learning different programming languages or testing frameworks.
7. Enables the entire team to write end-to-end UI tests quickly without programming knowledge.
8. Generates human-readable test scripts that are easily understandable by anyone.
9. Automates test cases in a very short span of time.
10. Serves as a scalable solution for building a software testing process in non-software companies.
Review Cons 1. The tool has been reported to crash occasionally, leading to more test case failures.
2. The cost of server resources may be a concern for some users.
3. Lacks educational materials to help improve QA efficiency for companies with less experience.
4. Some users have experienced issues with server responsiveness.
5. Initial challenges may be faced by companies with a limited QA team and lack of software testing knowledge.

Comparative Analysis of testRigor and Appium Pricing Models

testRigor Pricing Overview

testRigor, a test automation tool, adopts a tiered pricing strategy designed to accommodate various user needs. It offers a Free plan which is particularly suitable for open-source projects and includes unlimited users, cases, and suites, albeit with public visibility of tests and results. For users requiring more privacy and advanced features, the Private plan is available starting at $900 per month. This plan includes a 14-day trial period and allows for private tests. Customers can also opt for additional parallelizations to expedite test execution. The Enterprise plan is tailored for larger organizations and includes custom pricing. This plan comes with added benefits such as a dedicated manager, Slack support, and the possibility of on-premise deployment. All plans from testRigor feature unlimited users and test cases.

Appium Pricing Overview

Appium stands as a stark contrast to testRigor as it is a completely free, open-source software. There are no tiers or pricing plans associated with its usage, which makes it accessible to anyone from individual developers to large enterprises.

Comparison of Pricing Models

  • Cost Structure: The most apparent difference lies in their cost structures. testRigor has a free tier and paid plans, while Appium is universally free.
  • Access and Privacy: testRigor’s free plan offers unlimited access but with public visibility, which may not be ideal for projects requiring confidentiality. Its paid plans provide private testing environments. Appium, being open-source, does not inherently provide a privacy distinction, and the implementation of privacy features would be up to the user.
  • Support and Services: testRigor’s paid plans come with added support services, including a dedicated manager and Slack support in the Enterprise plan. Appium, while supported by a community, does not offer dedicated support services as part of a pricing model.
  • Customization and Scalability: For large organizations, testRigor’s Enterprise plan offers custom pricing and features, allowing scalability and potential on-premise deployment. Appium’s scalability and customization would depend on the technical capacity of its users since it is a free tool without predefined service tiers.
  • Trial Period: testRigor provides a 14-day trial for its Private plan, allowing users to test the service before committing financially. Appium does not require a trial period since it is free.


The two pricing models cater to different audiences. testRigor is suitable for teams that need structured support, privacy, and are willing to invest in their testing infrastructure. Its tiered pricing model allows for growth and scalability with the company’s needs. On the other hand, Appium is ideal for users who are looking for a cost-effective solution without the need for dedicated support or private test execution environments. The choice between these two products will largely depend on the specific requirements of the project and the resources available.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from!