Repeato vs Shot

Repeato vs Shot

18 January 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In the dynamic realm of mobile app testing, Repeato and Shot emerge as two distinct solutions tailored for enhancing app quality. Repeato offers a no-code, AI-driven approach to UI test automation across Android and iOS platforms, leveraging computer vision for ease of use and integration with CI/CD pipelines.

On the contrary, Shot specializes in Android screenshot testing, integrating with Gradle and emphasizing UI consistency with automated captures, albeit with a steeper learning curve. This comparison will dissect their unique capabilities to aid in selecting the right tool for your mobile app testing needs.

Latest update: 1/12/2024, 1:25:33 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from and and summarized by us.

Feature comparison of Repeato and Shot

Free Plan Available
On Premise Available
Device Farm AvailableN/A
Scheduler AvailableN/A
No Code
Uses AiN/A
Generates Reports
Uses Computer Vision
Ease Of Usevery easy to learnrequires expert technical knowledge
Review Pros 1. Simple and intuitive interface
2. Easy setup process, no complex configurations needed
3. Accessibility for both developers and non-programmers
4. Supports various testing methods like clicks, drags and scripting
5. Exceptional stability, no crashes or driver issues
6. Regular updates with bug fixes and excellent customer support
7. Great for mobile app testing, with efficient script creation
8. Allows for hundreds of additional tests each day
9. User-friendly, with easy adaptation and no initial setup required
10. Recognizes elements using visual fingerprints for testing
11. Allows for reusability and easy maintenance of scripts
12. No prior training or complex coding skills needed
Review Cons 1. Some limitations for iOS applications when tapping on any system window outside of the app
2. Access to CI/CD tools is only available at the enterprise level
3. Occasional unknown errors while performing basic tasks, although they are quickly remedied in the next version.

Comparison of Pricing Models: Repeato vs Shot

Repeato’s Pricing Overview

Repeato’s pricing structure is designed to accommodate a wide range of users, from individuals to large enterprises. The offerings include:

  • Free Plan: No cost, suitable for individuals or small projects.
  • Basic Plan: €70/month per user, unlimited testing minutes, and additional features.
  • Pro Plan: €120/month per user, unlimited testing minutes, priority support, and advanced features.
  • Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing, tailored for large organizations with specific needs.
    All plans come with unlimited Android and iOS tests, a variety of assertion and command options, and email support. The flexibility to upgrade, downgrade, or cancel at any time is provided, with potential discounts for NGOs, educational institutions, and annual commitments.

Shot’s Pricing Overview

Shot is presented as a free open-source software, emphasizing its accessibility and community-driven nature. There is no direct cost associated with using Shot, which can be highly attractive to startups, individuals, or organizations looking to minimize expenses. Being open-source, it may also offer the potential for customization and community support.

Comparison of Pricing Models

When comparing the pricing models of Repeato and Shot, several key differences and commonalities stand out:


  • Both products provide options that cater to users or organizations with budget constraints. Repeato offers a perpetual free plan, while Shot is entirely free as open-source software.
  • Each product includes support for Android and iOS tests, indicating a focus on mobile platform compatibility.


  • Cost Structure: Repeato uses a tiered subscription model with monthly fees per user for its Basic and Pro plans, and custom pricing for its Enterprise plan. In contrast, Shot is free and does not have a tiered structure or associated costs.
  • Support and Features: Repeato’s paid plans include additional features such as priority support and advanced testing capabilities, which are not explicitly mentioned for Shot. The open-source nature of Shot may imply reliance on community support rather than dedicated customer service.
  • Customization and Flexibility: While Repeato’s Enterprise plan offers tailored solutions for large organizations, Shot might provide more customization possibilities due to its open-source status, although this can come with a need for more technical expertise.
  • Pricing Flexibility: Repeato allows for subscription changes and offers potential discounts, suggesting a more structured approach to user engagement and retention. Shot’s model does not involve such considerations since it is free.
  • Target Audience: Repeato’s structured pricing model suggests a target audience ranging from individual developers to large enterprises, whereas Shot’s open-source model may appeal more to individual developers, startups, or organizations with a strong DIY ethos.

In conclusion, Repeato and Shot serve different market segments through their pricing models. Repeato offers a scalable solution with support and advanced features for a fee, while Shot appeals to those seeking a free, community-driven option with the potential for customization. Users should consider their specific needs, budget, and technical capabilities when choosing between these two products.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from!