5 February 2024 Leave a comment Tool comparisons
In the realm of automated testing, Leapwork and Playwright stand out, yet cater to different users. Leapwork is a no-code, AI-powered platform ideal for non-technical users seeking to automate tests across web, Android, and iOS without coding expertise.
In contrast, Playwright is an open-source Node.js library for those comfortable with code, offering robust browser automation and cross-browser testing solely for web applications. Choose Leapwork for a visual, no-code approach, or Playwright for a more technical, code-driven testing experience.
Latest update: 1/9/2024, 5:35:10 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.
Feature comparison of Leapwork and Playwright
| Feature | Leapwork | Playwright |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | – | ✔ |
| On Premise | ✔ | ✔ |
| Device Farm | – | – |
| Scheduler | ✔ | – |
| No Code | ✔ | – |
| Uses Ai | ✔ | N/A |
| Generates Reports | ✔ | ✔ |
| Uses Computer Vision | ✔ | – |
| Platforms | web,Android,iOS | web |
| Ease Of Use | very easy to learn | requires expert technical knowledge |
| Is Open Source | – | ✔ |
| Support Included | ✔ | – |
| Review Pros |
– Comprehensive data storage abilities without being locked into a single solution. – Excellent support with timely solutions upon request. – Ease of use in creating subflows for reusable tasks, which benefits non-technical testers. – Enables manual testers to create automation without extensive coding knowledge. – GUI-based platform that is easy to learn with a supportive knowledge base. – No technical prerequisites required for use. – In-depth strategy editor that supports web, desktop, and API automation. – Seamless integration of test cases involving both desktop and web applications. – Video export feature of executed test cases for documentation and training. – Excellent debugging functionality, including live video execution and video recording. | N/A |
| Review Cons |
– Minor user interface issues, such as watermarks not disappearing when typing. – Lack of check-in control in the Platform version compared to the Enterprise version. – Reporting features could be enhanced, such as email reports and dashboard improvements. – Identifying some web elements can be counterintuitive and may require advanced knowledge. – Mobile automation not built-in; reliance on third-party providers or tools is necessary. – Test execution can be slow when using remote agents. – Limited functionality for executing sub-flows compared to main flows. – Data-driven test automation from Excel is not dynamic and could be improved. – Limited Excel integration with only basic Read and Write blocks available. – Still an on-premises tool; could benefit from being cloud-based with automated backups and disaster recovery. | N/A |
Leapwork vs. Playwright: Comparing Pricing Models
Leapwork Pricing Overview
Leapwork Test Automation offers a customizable pricing model that caters to the varying needs of businesses and teams. This model does not have a fixed price listed publicly; instead, it requires potential users to contact the company directly to discuss their specific needs. The aim is to provide a tailored quote that aligns with the organization’s objectives, size, and team requirements. This approach suggests a more consultative sales process, where the cost is determined by the scope of use and the level of support and features required.
Playwright Pricing Overview
Playwright operates on a completely different pricing spectrum. It is a free, open-source software tool that can be used without any financial investment. As an open-source solution, Playwright allows users to access its full suite of features without any cost, relying on community support and contributions for maintenance and development.
Comparing the Pricing Models
Common Points
At first glance, Leapwork and Playwright may seem to have vastly different pricing strategies. However, both are designed to be accessible to a wide range of users:
- Accessibility: Leapwork’s personalized pricing ensures that businesses only pay for what they need, making it accessible to companies of various sizes. Playwright’s open-source nature guarantees free access for everyone, from individual developers to large enterprises.
- Scalability: Both tools offer scalable solutions, although through different means. Leapwork can scale its pricing based on the evolving needs of a business, while Playwright allows for scalability without any additional cost.
Key Differences
The differences between the pricing models of Leapwork and Playwright are significant and can influence a business’s decision-making process:
- Cost: The most apparent difference is the cost—Leapwork operates on a quote-based pricing model, which implies that there will be a cost associated with its use, tailored to the customer’s needs. On the other hand, Playwright is entirely free.
- Personalization vs. Community-Driven: Leapwork’s model provides a personalized quote, suggesting a level of personalized service and support. In contrast, Playwright, as an open-source tool, relies on community-driven support, documentation, and user contributions.
- Commercial Support: With Leapwork, the expectation of commercial support is implicit in the customized pricing model. This may include dedicated customer service, technical support, and professional services. Playwright, while having a community for support, may not offer the same level of direct commercial support.
- Licensing: Leapwork’s licensing costs will vary and are part of the custom quote, while Playwright has no licensing fees due to its open-source nature.
Conclusion
In summary, Leapwork’s pricing model is designed for businesses seeking a tailored solution with potentially more direct and personalized support. Playwright, being free and open-source, is ideal for those looking for a cost-effective solution with community-based support. The choice between the two will depend on the organization’s budget, support needs, and preference for a customized solution versus a community-driven one.
