Leapwork vs Espresso

Leapwork vs Espresso

5 February 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In the bustling world of test automation, Leapwork and Espresso stand out for their distinctive approaches. Leapwork is a no-code, AI-enhanced automation platform that excels in testing across web, Android, and iOS, with a strong emphasis on ease of use and support for various industries.


Conversely, Espresso is an open-source framework tailored specifically for Android UI testing, requiring coding expertise but offering robust, concise script creation. This article will elucidate the key differences, helping you decide which tool best fits your testing needs.


Latest update: 1/9/2024, 5:35:10 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.


Feature comparison of Leapwork and Espresso

FeatureLeapworkEspresso
Free Plan
On Premise
Device Farm
Scheduler
No Code
Uses Ai
Generates Reports
Uses Computer Vision
Platformsweb,Android,iOSAndroid
Ease Of Usevery easy to learnrequires advanced technical knowledge
Is Open Source
Support Included
Review Pros – Comprehensive data storage abilities without being locked into a single solution.
– Excellent support with timely solutions upon request.
– Ease of use in creating subflows for reusable tasks, which benefits non-technical testers.
– Enables manual testers to create automation without extensive coding knowledge.
– GUI-based platform that is easy to learn with a supportive knowledge base.
– No technical prerequisites required for use.
– In-depth strategy editor that supports web, desktop, and API automation.
– Seamless integration of test cases involving both desktop and web applications.
– Video export feature of executed test cases for documentation and training.
– Excellent debugging functionality, including live video execution and video recording.
N/A
Review Cons – Minor user interface issues, such as watermarks not disappearing when typing.
– Lack of check-in control in the Platform version compared to the Enterprise version.
– Reporting features could be enhanced, such as email reports and dashboard improvements.
– Identifying some web elements can be counterintuitive and may require advanced knowledge.
– Mobile automation not built-in; reliance on third-party providers or tools is necessary.
– Test execution can be slow when using remote agents.
– Limited functionality for executing sub-flows compared to main flows.
– Data-driven test automation from Excel is not dynamic and could be improved.
– Limited Excel integration with only basic Read and Write blocks available.
– Still an on-premises tool; could benefit from being cloud-based with automated backups and disaster recovery.
N/A


Pricing Overview of Leapwork and Espresso

Leapwork Pricing Description

Leapwork offers a customizable pricing model tailored to fit the diverse needs of businesses and teams. Recognizing that each organization has unique requirements, Leapwork does not provide a standard pricing list. Instead, they propose a consultative approach where potential users can reach out to discuss their specific circumstances. This ensures that the pricing plan is aligned with the organization’s objectives, team size, and dynamics. To receive a personalized quote, interested parties are encouraged to contact Leapwork directly.

Espresso Pricing Description

Espresso stands on the opposite end of the spectrum as it is a free open source software. It is readily accessible to anyone looking to implement test automation without any associated costs. As an open source tool, Espresso allows for community-driven development and customization. Users can contribute to its development, share fixes and features, and utilize the collective expertise of the community.

Comparison of Pricing Models

When comparing the pricing models of Leapwork and Espresso, several key differences and commonalities are evident:

Common Points:

  • Both Leapwork and Espresso are designed to cater to the needs of teams looking to implement test automation, though the approach to pricing is where they converge.
  • Customization is a focal point for both, though it manifests differently. Leapwork customizes pricing, while Espresso allows for the customization of the software itself due to its open source nature.

Differences:

  • Cost: The most significant difference lies in their cost structure. Leapwork operates on a quote-based pricing model, where the cost is determined by the specific needs of the business. In contrast, Espresso is completely free, eliminating the financial barrier to entry for software teams.
  • Accessibility: Espresso is immediately accessible to anyone, whereas Leapwork requires an initial consultation to determine the pricing, which may add a lead time before implementation can begin.
  • Support and Services: With Leapwork, the personalized pricing likely includes professional support and services tailored to the organization’s needs. Espresso, being open source, relies on community support, which can vary in responsiveness and expertise.
  • Ownership and Maintenance: Leapwork’s model suggests a more traditional vendor-client relationship with ongoing support, whereas Espresso users are responsible for their own maintenance and updates, though they can leverage community contributions.

In summary, Leapwork’s pricing model is ideal for organizations seeking a tailored solution with dedicated support and a willingness to invest in a premium service. Espresso, on the other hand, suits teams with limited budgets, a desire for community collaboration, or those with the technical capability to customize and maintain the software themselves. The choice between the two will largely depend on an organization’s specific needs, resources, and strategic priorities.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from.