Leapwork vs Detox

Leapwork vs Detox

5 February 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In the dynamic world of test automation, Leapwork and Detox emerge as distinct solutions for different needs. Leapwork is a no-code, AI-powered platform that simplifies test automation across web and mobile applications, boasting a visual interface and extensive support for various industries.

In contrast, Detox is an open-source, code-driven framework tailored for gray box end-to-end testing on mobile platforms, specifically honed for React Native apps. While Leapwork excels with its no-code approach and AI features, Detox offers a more hands-on experience with code, appealing to those who prefer a more technical grip on automation.

Latest update: 1/9/2024, 5:35:10 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.

Feature comparison of Leapwork and Detox

Free Plan
On Premise
Device Farm
No Code
Uses Ai
Generates Reports
Uses Computer Vision
Ease Of Usevery easy to learnrequires expert technical knowledge
Is Open Source
Support Included
Review Pros – Comprehensive data storage abilities without being locked into a single solution.
– Excellent support with timely solutions upon request.
– Ease of use in creating subflows for reusable tasks, which benefits non-technical testers.
– Enables manual testers to create automation without extensive coding knowledge.
– GUI-based platform that is easy to learn with a supportive knowledge base.
– No technical prerequisites required for use.
– In-depth strategy editor that supports web, desktop, and API automation.
– Seamless integration of test cases involving both desktop and web applications.
– Video export feature of executed test cases for documentation and training.
– Excellent debugging functionality, including live video execution and video recording.
Review Cons – Minor user interface issues, such as watermarks not disappearing when typing.
– Lack of check-in control in the Platform version compared to the Enterprise version.
– Reporting features could be enhanced, such as email reports and dashboard improvements.
– Identifying some web elements can be counterintuitive and may require advanced knowledge.
– Mobile automation not built-in; reliance on third-party providers or tools is necessary.
– Test execution can be slow when using remote agents.
– Limited functionality for executing sub-flows compared to main flows.
– Data-driven test automation from Excel is not dynamic and could be improved.
– Limited Excel integration with only basic Read and Write blocks available.
– Still an on-premises tool; could benefit from being cloud-based with automated backups and disaster recovery.

Pricing Overview of Leapwork and Detox

Leapwork Pricing Description

Leapwork Test Automation provides a flexible pricing model, emphasizing a customizable approach that caters to businesses of different scales and teams with varying needs. The company does not offer a standard pricing plan; instead, it opts for a tailored pricing strategy. Potential clients are encouraged to initiate contact with Leapwork to engage in a dialogue about their specific requirements. Through this consultation process, Leapwork aims to deliver a quote that is aligned with the customer’s business goals and the composition of their teams. This bespoke pricing model allows for a more personalized solution that can adapt to the complexity and scope of any given organization’s test automation needs.

Detox Pricing Description

Detox operates on a completely different pricing spectrum compared to Leapwork. As an open-source framework for mobile app testing, Detox is freely available to the public. There are no direct costs associated with downloading, implementing, or using Detox in a project. The open-source nature of Detox means that it is maintained by a community of contributors, and users can contribute to its development. The absence of a price tag makes Detox an accessible option for individuals, startups, and enterprises looking for a cost-effective solution for their mobile testing needs.

Comparison of Pricing Models

The two products, Leapwork and Detox, offer distinct pricing models that cater to different segments of the market:

  • Customization vs. Universality: Leapwork’s pricing model is highly customizable, which means that the cost is variable and depends on the specific needs and scale of the business. In contrast, Detox is universally free, providing a one-size-fits-all solution that can be adapted by the user to fit their needs without any financial investment.

  • Consultation vs. Self-Service: To obtain pricing information for Leapwork, a potential user must engage in a consultation process, which can be beneficial for receiving a tailored solution but may require more time and effort upfront. Detox, on the other hand, does not require any formal consultation process, allowing users to download and start using the software immediately.

  • Target Audience: Leapwork’s approach is likely to appeal to larger businesses or those with complex requirements who are looking for a solution that fits their specific circumstances. Detox is ideal for individual developers, startups, or companies that are looking for a free, community-supported tool.

  • Cost Implications: With Leapwork, the cost is a critical consideration, and it may vary widely depending on the services and scale required. Detox eliminates cost as a barrier, potentially offering significant savings, especially for those with limited budgets.

In conclusion, Leapwork’s personalized pricing model is suited for organizations seeking a customized test automation solution and are willing to invest in it. Detox, being free and open-source, serves the needs of those who prioritize accessibility and community-supported development without the concern for direct software costs. Each model presents clear advantages depending on the user’s requirements and financial constraints.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from!