In the competitive landscape of test automation tools, testRigor and Repeato stand out for their no-code, AI-driven capabilities, simplifying test creation for teams with limited technical expertise. testRigor offers a diverse testing environment for web, mobile, and API platforms, integrating with device farms and boasting SOC2 and HIPAA compliance.
In contrast, Repeato specializes in mobile app testing, leveraging computer vision and machine learning to expedite UI test execution for Android and iOS. Both tools facilitate CI/CD integration, offer free plans, and prioritize ease of use, but cater to different testing needs and environments.
Latest update: 1/31/2024, 3:45:26 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.
Feature comparison of testRigor and Repeato
|Uses Computer Vision
|Ease Of Use
|very easy to learn
|very easy to learn
|Is Open Source
1. Allows writing and generating test scripts using plain English statements.
2. Offers integration with various tools such as JIRA and TestRail.
3. Capable of running tests on multiple browsers and devices simultaneously.
4. Features automatic test script generation, saving time and effort.
5. Provides efficient customer support, ensuring ease of use and implementation.
6. Eliminates the need for learning different programming languages or testing frameworks.
7. Enables the entire team to write end-to-end UI tests quickly without programming knowledge.
8. Generates human-readable test scripts that are easily understandable by anyone.
9. Automates test cases in a very short span of time.
10. Serves as a scalable solution for building a software testing process in non-software companies.
1. Simple and intuitive interface
2. Easy setup process, no complex configurations needed
3. Accessibility for both developers and non-programmers
4. Supports various testing methods like clicks, drags and scripting
5. Exceptional stability, no crashes or driver issues
6. Regular updates with bug fixes and excellent customer support
7. Great for mobile app testing, with efficient script creation
8. Allows for hundreds of additional tests each day
9. User-friendly, with easy adaptation and no initial setup required
10. Recognizes elements using visual fingerprints for testing
11. Allows for reusability and easy maintenance of scripts
12. No prior training or complex coding skills needed
1. The tool has been reported to crash occasionally, leading to more test case failures.
2. The cost of server resources may be a concern for some users.
3. Lacks educational materials to help improve QA efficiency for companies with less experience.
4. Some users have experienced issues with server responsiveness.
5. Initial challenges may be faced by companies with a limited QA team and lack of software testing knowledge.
1. Some limitations for iOS applications when tapping on any system window outside of the app
2. Access to CI/CD tools is only available at the enterprise level
3. Occasional unknown errors while performing basic tasks, although they are quickly remedied in the next version.
Pricing Comparison between testRigor and Repeato
testRigor Pricing Overview
testRigor presents a tiered pricing strategy, starting with a Free plan that caters to open-source projects and offers unlimited users, cases, and suites, albeit with public test visibility. The Private plan, at $900 per month, includes private tests and the possibility of faster execution through additional parallelizations, along with a 14-day trial period. The Enterprise plan is tailored for larger organizations, offering custom pricing, a dedicated manager, Slack support, and potential on-premise deployment.
Repeato Pricing Overview
Repeato also provides a tiered pricing model with a perpetual Free plan suitable for individuals or small teams. The Basic plan costs €70 per month per user, and the Pro plan is €120 per month per user, both featuring unlimited testing minutes and advanced features. The Enterprise plan is customizable and pricing is provided upon request. All plans feature unlimited Android and iOS tests, a variety of testing options, and email support, with more benefits available at higher tiers. Subscription flexibility is a key aspect, with options to upgrade, downgrade, or cancel, and potential discounts for NGOs, educational users, and annual commitments.
Comparison of Pricing Models
- Tiered Pricing: Both tools offer multiple pricing tiers, ensuring scalability from free offerings to enterprise-level solutions.
- Free Plans: Each company provides a Free plan designed to attract new users or support small-scale projects.
- Unlimited Testing: Both testRigor and Repeato include unlimited tests in their plans, allowing extensive testing without concern for limits.
- Enterprise Customization: Tailored solutions are available for larger organizations, though specifics vary between the two.
- Public vs. Private Testing: testRigor’s Free plan includes public visibility of tests, whereas Repeato’s Free plan does not specify this condition.
- Per-User vs. Flat-Rate Pricing: Repeato charges per user on its Basic and Pro plans, whereas testRigor offers a flat rate for its Private plan.
- Additional Costs for Parallelization: testRigor provides the option to purchase additional parallelizations for faster execution, a cost above the base rate, not mentioned in Repeato’s model.
- Support Options: testRigor includes Slack support and a dedicated manager in its Enterprise plan, while Repeato offers priority support at higher tiers.
- Trial Period: testRigor offers a 14-day trial for its Private plan, an option not explicitly mentioned by Repeato.
- Subscription Flexibility: Repeato emphasizes the ability to upgrade, downgrade, or cancel at any time, with possible discounts for certain users, which is not highlighted in testRigor’s description.
In summary, while both testRigor and Repeato offer tiered pricing structures designed to accommodate a range of users, from individuals to large enterprises, their approaches differ in the granularity of pricing (per-user vs. flat-rate), the visibility of tests in free versions, and the availability of additional features or support at different pricing levels. Users should consider their specific needs for privacy, scalability, user count, and support when choosing between these two test automation tools.