Katalon Studio: Known Limitations and Challenges

26 February 2025 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Katalon Issues, Uncategorized

Katalon Studio is a popular all-in-one automation tool, but like any platform, it has its limitations. Below is an overview of known constraints in functionality, performance, integrations, and usability that users commonly encounter, along with practical insights for those considering Katalon as their automation solution.

Functionality Limitations

  • Single Scripting Language: Katalon uses Groovy (Java) as the sole scripting language for test cases. Unlike Selenium or TestComplete which support multiple languages, Katalon does not support writing tests in Python, C#, JavaScript, etc. This can be limiting if your team prefers or needs a different language. (Groovy is Java-based, so Java developers adapt easily, but others may face a learning curve.)
  • Not Open Source: Katalon Studio’s core is closed-source, meaning users cannot modify the tool’s internal code or benefit from a large open-source contributor community. In contrast, open-source tools like Selenium allow customization and community-built extensions. Katalon does offer some open plugins and an open-source keywords library, but the Studio itself isn’t open for community improvements.
  • Limited Built-in Testing Scope: Katalon is oriented toward functional testing (web, mobile, API, desktop) and lacks certain testing types. Performance and load testing are not supported within Katalon Studio – there is no built-in performance testing module. Users seeking to do stress or load tests must integrate external tools like JMeter. Similarly, while Katalon handles UI and API tests well, it may require plugins or workarounds for specialized testing needs (e.g., BDD requires a Cucumber plugin, since Gherkin support isn’t native).
  • Built-in Keywords Customization: Katalon provides a rich set of built-in keywords (actions) for common operations. However, these built-in keywords cannot be modified – they are essentially black boxes. You can add new custom keywords in Groovy, but you cannot change the behavior of existing built-in keywords. This is usually fine, but advanced users who want to tweak built-in functions might be frustrated by this lack of flexibility.
  • Free vs Enterprise Features: While Katalon’s free version is quite powerful, some advanced capabilities are reserved for Katalon Studio Enterprise (paid). For instance, features like test scheduling, advanced analytics, integration with Katalon TestOps, or using the tool in a CI/CD pipeline headlessly all require an upgrade. The free edition is ideal for individuals or small projects, but larger teams often need the Enterprise version to unlock certain plugins and overcome usage limits.

Performance and Resource Issues

  • Resource-Intensive Tool: Katalon Studio can be heavy on system resources. Users have noted that running large test suites or working with complex projects can consume a lot of memory and CPU, sometimes impacting the machine’s performance. The IDE itself has a substantial footprint since it’s built on Eclipse. To mitigate this, run Katalon on a machine with ample RAM and consider splitting very large test suites if you experience slowness.
  • Sluggishness and Freezes: Some users report that the Katalon IDE may freeze or lag during use—especially when handling many objects or heavy test scripts. Occasionally, the application can become unresponsive, forcing a restart. These performance bugs can hamper testing efficiency, so it’s wise to save work frequently and use Katalon’s console mode for execution when possible (keeping in mind licensing requirements for console mode).
  • Slow Test Execution in Some Areas: Although Katalon uses Selenium/WebDriver under the hood for web testing, the overhead of the tool can make startup and certain actions slower. Mobile testing, in particular, can be slower or more cumbersome. Additionally, there is an initial delay when launching Katalon or large projects as it loads all test artifacts.
  • Scalability Constraints: When scaling up test suites, Katalon’s performance can degrade. Extremely large projects (thousands of test cases) may lead to longer load times and occasional instability. It’s recommended to organize tests modularly and possibly use multiple projects or Katalon’s test suite collection execution (with parallel execution) to manage very large test sets. Note that the number of parallel executions may be limited by licensing and your system’s capacity.

Integration and Compatibility Challenges

  • CI/CD Pipeline Usage Requires License: A key consideration is that running Katalon tests in headless or CI/CD environments (via command-line) is not free. Starting from Katalon 7.x, you need a Katalon Runtime Engine (KRE) license to execute tests in console/CI mode. In other words, while you can run tests within the Studio GUI for free, integrating Katalon into Jenkins or other CI servers for automated test runs will incur a cost (unless you stick to an older version or alternative setups).
  • Limited Tech Stack and Language Integration: Katalon’s ecosystem is built on Java/Groovy, and it doesn’t natively support other programming stacks. Users have pointed out that integration with certain development stacks (like .NET or PHP) is lacking. If your application under test is a .NET desktop app, Katalon does support Windows desktop testing via WinAppDriver, but you won’t be writing test code in C#. Similarly, there’s no direct support for testing PHP applications beyond web UI automation.
  • Platform Compatibility (Linux Issues): Katalon Studio is cross-platform (Windows, macOS, Linux), but Linux support has been noted as a weak point. Some users report that on Linux the Studio GUI can be unstable, with frequent crashes or UI glitches. The Linux version often lags behind in polish compared to the Windows version, so many teams run Katalon on Windows for better stability.
  • Third-Party Integration Gaps: Katalon integrates with many popular tools (JIRA, TestRail, qTest, Slack, Kobiton, etc.) and CI systems (Jenkins, Azure DevOps, GitLab CI). However, for tools outside its officially supported list, integration may require custom work or plugins. While Katalon can use Selenium Grid or cloud providers for execution, setting up those integrations can be largely manual.

Usability and Support Constraints

  • Steeper Learning Curve for Advanced Use: Katalon markets itself as a tool for testers with or without programming skills, thanks to its dual interface (manual mode and script mode). However, as tests grow in complexity, users often need to switch to scripting, which requires understanding Groovy/Java. The interface isn’t always intuitive for newcomers, leading to a learning curve. Non-programmers can hit a ceiling and may need developer assistance to implement complex logic.
  • Object Spy and Recorder Limitations: Katalon’s Web Recorder and Object Spy features are meant to simplify capturing elements and generating test steps. These can be brittle and sometimes unreliable. The Object Spy may fail to detect certain dynamic or complex web elements, especially in modern single-page applications. It might capture incorrect locators or break if the UI changes slightly, leading to flaky tests.
  • Documentation and Help Resources: Another commonly cited issue is that Katalon’s documentation and community support can be inconsistent. Official documentation may be incomplete in certain areas. The community is smaller than Selenium’s, so users may find fewer tutorials or quick answers. Katalon’s own forum is the primary help resource, and for niche issues, responses might take time.
  • UI and Project Management Quirks: Katalon Studio’s interface, built on Eclipse, can feel clunky at times. Tasks like renaming objects or refactoring test steps can require multiple clicks. There is no native multi-user collaboration within a project (aside from using Git). Also, merging test artifacts from different users can be tricky, potentially complicating large team-based projects.
  • Licensing and Cost Considerations: Certain convenient features (like a plugin for test scheduling or advanced reporting) might only be accessible with an Enterprise license. Katalon’s pricing for enterprise features can be a concern for some, especially smaller teams. Users on a tight budget might feel constrained on the free version.

Practical Insights for Prospective Users

  • Align Tool with Testing Needs: Evaluate your project’s requirements. If you need performance or load testing, note that Katalon Studio doesn’t provide it out-of-the-box. If your team favors a specific programming language, Katalon’s Groovy-only approach could be a hurdle. Consider whether a more flexible framework is a better fit for your environment.
  • Plan for Environment and Resources: Ensure you have the right environment for Katalon. For instance, if you use Linux, be prepared for possible instability. Also, allocate sufficient RAM/CPU for large projects. If you encounter slowness, optimize test suites, clean up object repositories, etc.
  • CI/CD Integration Strategy: If continuous integration is a part of your process, factor in the cost of Katalon Runtime Engine (KRE) licenses for CLI execution. This can affect your automation budget. Some teams use the free Katalon Studio for test development and find alternative ways to run tests in CI to avoid licensing fees, but that can add complexity.
  • Leverage Katalon’s Strengths: For quick startup in test automation, Katalon’s record-playback combined with custom scripting can be powerful. Use the Object Spy to speed up initial test creation, but invest time in writing robust selectors and scripts to reduce flakiness.
  • Community and Support Utilization: Make the most of Katalon’s official resources. The community may be smaller than Selenium’s, but the Katalon Forum and Academy can be helpful. For critical projects, consider Enterprise for premium support.
  • Trial on a Pilot Project: Before fully committing, test Katalon on a smaller project or subset of your testing needs. Monitor performance, object detection, and whether the limitations are manageable. If issues arise, you can switch tools or workflows without heavy sunk costs.

By understanding these limitations and planning for them, you can make an informed decision about using Katalon Studio. Many teams successfully use Katalon for web, API, and mobile testing – but they do so with awareness of its constraints, using workarounds or supplementary tools as needed. Weigh the pros (fast setup, unified platform, rich features) against the cons outlined above to determine if Katalon’s value proposition aligns with your project’s needs and constraints.

Sources

Check it out!

Like this article? there’s more where that came from!

Repeato

Documentation

Support

Legal

Repeato Reviews