5 February 2024 Leave a comment Tool comparisons
Choosing the right automated testing tool is crucial for efficient quality assurance. In this article, we compare Testsigma, a low-code, AI-driven test automation platform, with the now-discontinued TestComplete.
Testsigma offers codeless operations for mobile, web, and API testing and boasts features like AI-driven automation and CI/CD integrations. It’s designed to be very user-friendly, with a focus on streamlining the QA process. On the other hand, TestComplete was a functional UI testing tool that supported script-based and scriptless testing, with AI-powered object recognition. Although TestComplete is no longer available, understanding its features provides valuable context for current options like Testsigma.
Latest update: 1/31/2024, 5:18:29 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.
Feature comparison of Testsigma and TestComplete
| Feature | Testsigma | TestComplete |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | ✔ | – |
| On Premise | ✔ | N/A |
| Device Farm | ✔ | ✔ |
| Scheduler | ✔ | N/A |
| Test Recorder | ✔ | N/A |
| Physical Device Testing | ✔ | N/A |
| No Code | ✔ | ✔ |
| Uses Ai | ✔ | ✔ |
| Generates Reports | ✔ | ✔ |
| Uses Computer Vision | N/A | N/A |
| Platforms | web,Android,iOS | web,Android,iOS |
| Ease Of Use | very easy to learn | easy to learn |
| Is Open Source | – | – |
| Support Included | ✔ | ✔ |
| Review Pros |
1. Rapid Test Automation: Users can automate most test cases quickly without needing expertise in specific languages or frameworks. 2. Customer Support: The support team is highly responsive and easily accessible directly through the platform. 3. Ease of Use: The platform is user-friendly, requiring minimal training to handle. 4. Test Step Grouping: This feature streamlines the development of new scripts by grouping test steps. 5. No-Script Automation: Offers a codeless approach to test automation, making it accessible to non-technical users. 6. Integration Capabilities: Testsigma allows for seamless integration with various tools, enhancing the automation suite. 7. Natural Language Processing (NLP): Testsigma uses NLP for test cases, making it intuitive to write tests in plain English. 8. Accessibility: It caters to users with non-technical backgrounds, allowing them to learn and use the platform effectively. 9. End-to-End Testing: It supports comprehensive testing, including validation of OTPs via Email and SMS. 10. Custom Functionality: Users can import custom code to extend functionality when required actions are not available. | N/A |
| Review Cons |
1. Limited Database Testing: Currently, Testsigma does not support direct database testing, though some validation can be done using custom functions. 2. Reporting Features: The reporting capabilities are somewhat limited and could be improved. 3. Performance Issues: Some users have reported slower execution times and non-functional cloud devices. 4. End-to-End Testing Complexity: While possible, some users find end-to-end testing to be challenging. 5. Salesforce Integration: There is a need for improved integration features with Salesforce. 6. Ticket Tracking: Improvements could be made in how user-raised tickets are tracked. 7. Desktop Application Automation: Testsigma does not currently support the automation of desktop applications. 8. Element Inspection Limitations: Some elements cannot be inspected directly, requiring workarounds like Sikuli for interaction. 9. Occasional Errors: Users have encountered intermittent errors, sometimes due to platform maintenance or upgrades. 10. Lack of Transparency: There is a need for better communication regarding maintenance and updates that may affect test performance. | N/A |
Comparing Pricing Models of Test Automation Platforms
Pricing Overview of Testsigma
Testsigma is an AI-driven test automation platform that offers various pricing tiers to accommodate different team sizes and testing requirements. The structure of their pricing is as follows:
- Free Plan: Aimed at smaller projects, this plan provides basic testing capabilities and resources.
- Pro Plan: Designed for fast-growing teams, offering unlimited automated testing minutes, a wide range of device and browser combinations, parallel execution, and integration with popular development tools.
- Enterprise Plan: Tailored for large teams and Test Centers of Excellence (TCOEs), featuring advanced security, unlimited storage, custom data retention policies, and dedicated support.
Testsigma’s pricing for the Pro and Enterprise plans is not listed publicly and requires potential customers to request a quote. This indicates a customized pricing strategy that varies depending on the specific needs of the organization.
Pricing Overview of TestComplete
Unfortunately, the pricing information for TestComplete is not available at the moment.
Comparison of Pricing Models
Since we only have the pricing information for Testsigma, we can focus on the key aspects of its model and how it may compare to typical pricing models in the test automation market.
Tiered Pricing: Testsigma’s use of tiered pricing is common, with many platforms offering a range of plans to fit different user needs. The presence of a free tier is also a typical feature, allowing users to test basic functionality before committing financially.
Custom Pricing for Higher Tiers: Requesting a quote for Pro and Enterprise plans suggests a level of customization in pricing. This is often indicative of a service that can scale significantly in terms of features, support, and resources, and is a common approach for enterprise-level software solutions.
Feature-Based Differentiation: The delineation of features between the Free, Pro, and Enterprise plans is a standard practice. It allows for clear distinctions in value that can justify the cost differences for potential customers.
Without the pricing details for TestComplete, it’s challenging to draw a direct comparison. However, based on industry norms, we can infer that TestComplete may also offer tiered pricing with a potential free or trial option, a middle tier for growing teams, and an enterprise solution with additional features and support.
The key differences in any pricing model comparison would typically revolve around:
- Cost Transparency: Whether pricing is publicly listed or requires a personalized quote.
- Scalability: How well the pricing tiers accommodate growing needs.
- Included Features: The specific features and resources included in each tier.
- Support Level: The type and extent of support provided at different pricing levels.
In summary, while Testsigma’s pricing model is clear in its tiered structure and customization for higher-end needs, without the details of TestComplete’s pricing, the comparison remains incomplete. Readers interested in both products should consider their project size, required features, and potential for growth when evaluating which pricing model might best suit their needs.
