In the dynamic realm of test automation, choosing the right tool can be pivotal. Testsigma offers a low-code, AI-driven platform that simplifies testing across web and mobile applications with its codeless setup, while Marathon caters to those with technical expertise, providing a robust, script-based approach for Android and iOS platforms.
Both tools facilitate test automation but differ significantly in usability and features. Testsigma’s ease of use and AI capabilities stand out for non-technical users, whereas Marathon’s open-source nature appeals to developers seeking a customizable solution. Dive into our comprehensive comparison to determine which tool best aligns with your testing strategy.
Latest update: 1/31/2024, 5:18:29 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.
Feature comparison of Testsigma and Marathon
|Physical Device Testing
|Uses Computer Vision
|Ease Of Use
|very easy to learn
|requires expert technical knowledge
|Is Open Source
1. Rapid Test Automation: Users can automate most test cases quickly without needing expertise in specific languages or frameworks.
2. Customer Support: The support team is highly responsive and easily accessible directly through the platform.
3. Ease of Use: The platform is user-friendly, requiring minimal training to handle.
4. Test Step Grouping: This feature streamlines the development of new scripts by grouping test steps.
5. No-Script Automation: Offers a codeless approach to test automation, making it accessible to non-technical users.
6. Integration Capabilities: Testsigma allows for seamless integration with various tools, enhancing the automation suite.
7. Natural Language Processing (NLP): Testsigma uses NLP for test cases, making it intuitive to write tests in plain English.
8. Accessibility: It caters to users with non-technical backgrounds, allowing them to learn and use the platform effectively.
9. End-to-End Testing: It supports comprehensive testing, including validation of OTPs via Email and SMS.
10. Custom Functionality: Users can import custom code to extend functionality when required actions are not available.
1. Limited Database Testing: Currently, Testsigma does not support direct database testing, though some validation can be done using custom functions.
2. Reporting Features: The reporting capabilities are somewhat limited and could be improved.
3. Performance Issues: Some users have reported slower execution times and non-functional cloud devices.
4. End-to-End Testing Complexity: While possible, some users find end-to-end testing to be challenging.
5. Salesforce Integration: There is a need for improved integration features with Salesforce.
6. Ticket Tracking: Improvements could be made in how user-raised tickets are tracked.
7. Desktop Application Automation: Testsigma does not currently support the automation of desktop applications.
8. Element Inspection Limitations: Some elements cannot be inspected directly, requiring workarounds like Sikuli for interaction.
9. Occasional Errors: Users have encountered intermittent errors, sometimes due to platform maintenance or upgrades.
10. Lack of Transparency: There is a need for better communication regarding maintenance and updates that may affect test performance.
Pricing Overview of Testsigma and Marathon
Testsigma delivers a versatile test automation solution with a tiered pricing structure to support different team sizes and project scopes.
- Free Plan: Aimed at small projects, offering basic testing capabilities.
- Pro Plan: Targeted at fast-growing teams, providing unlimited automated testing minutes and a wide array of device and browser combinations, alongside parallel execution and various integrations.
- Enterprise Plan: Crafted for large teams and TCOEs, featuring advanced security, unlimited storage, and dedicated support. Both Pro and Enterprise plans are customized and require direct contact with the sales team for pricing.
Marathon is markedly different as it is a free, open-source software tool. There is no direct cost associated with using Marathon, and it does not offer tiered pricing or plans.
Comparison of Pricing Models
When examining the pricing models of Testsigma and Marathon, several key differences and commonalities emerge:
- Accessibility: Both tools offer a solution that is accessible without initial financial investment. Testsigma has a Free plan, while Marathon is entirely open-source.
- Adaptability: They cater to projects of varying sizes, from small-scale to extensive enterprise requirements.
- Pricing Structure: Testsigma employs a traditional tiered pricing model with escalating levels of service and features, whereas Marathon is uniformly free.
- Customization: Testsigma’s pricing for Pro and Enterprise plans is customizable, requiring potential customers to engage in discussions with their sales team to determine the cost based on their specific needs.
- Support and Features: With Testsigma, the paid plans presumably offer more extensive support options and advanced features compared to the free tier, reflecting a more service-oriented approach. Marathon, being open-source, relies on community support and contributions, which may not guarantee the same level of service or feature development.
- Enterprise Readiness: Testsigma’s Enterprise plan is explicitly designed for large organizations, indicating a readiness to handle complex, large-scale testing environments, which may not be explicitly addressed by Marathon.
- Commercial vs. Community: Testsigma operates on a commercial basis with its paid plans, while Marathon is community-driven, with implications for support, reliability, and updates.
In summary, Testsigma offers a scalable pricing model designed to fit varied business needs, with a clear path from free to professional to enterprise-grade solutions. This model is well-suited for teams looking for a comprehensive, supported, and customizable testing platform. Marathon, on the other hand, provides an open-source alternative that attracts users with its cost-free nature, community support, and the flexibility that often accompanies open-source software. Users of Marathon may need to rely on their own expertise or community support for troubleshooting and enhancements, whereas Testsigma users have access to dedicated customer service and advanced features.