5 February 2024 Leave a comment Tool comparisons
In the ever-evolving landscape of software testing, two prominent platforms stand out: Testsigma and Flank. Testsigma offers a low-code, AI-enhanced test automation environment that simplifies testing across web and mobile applications, ideal for teams seeking codeless solutions with robust customer support.
On the other hand, Flank is an open-source test runner designed for Android and iOS, demanding a higher degree of technical expertise with its YAML configurations and gcloud CLI integrations. This comparison will dissect their features, from Testsigma’s physical device testing and no-code approach to Flank’s parallel execution prowess and Firebase Test Lab integration.
Latest update: 1/31/2024, 5:18:29 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.
Feature comparison of Testsigma and Flank
| Feature | Testsigma | Flank |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | ✔ | ✔ |
| On Premise | ✔ | ✔ |
| Device Farm | ✔ | – |
| Scheduler | ✔ | – |
| Test Recorder | ✔ | N/A |
| Physical Device Testing | ✔ | N/A |
| No Code | ✔ | – |
| Uses Ai | ✔ | – |
| Generates Reports | ✔ | ✔ |
| Uses Computer Vision | N/A | – |
| Platforms | web,Android,iOS | Android,iOS |
| Ease Of Use | very easy to learn | requires expert technical knowledge |
| Is Open Source | – | ✔ |
| Support Included | ✔ | – |
| Review Pros |
1. Rapid Test Automation: Users can automate most test cases quickly without needing expertise in specific languages or frameworks. 2. Customer Support: The support team is highly responsive and easily accessible directly through the platform. 3. Ease of Use: The platform is user-friendly, requiring minimal training to handle. 4. Test Step Grouping: This feature streamlines the development of new scripts by grouping test steps. 5. No-Script Automation: Offers a codeless approach to test automation, making it accessible to non-technical users. 6. Integration Capabilities: Testsigma allows for seamless integration with various tools, enhancing the automation suite. 7. Natural Language Processing (NLP): Testsigma uses NLP for test cases, making it intuitive to write tests in plain English. 8. Accessibility: It caters to users with non-technical backgrounds, allowing them to learn and use the platform effectively. 9. End-to-End Testing: It supports comprehensive testing, including validation of OTPs via Email and SMS. 10. Custom Functionality: Users can import custom code to extend functionality when required actions are not available. | N/A |
| Review Cons |
1. Limited Database Testing: Currently, Testsigma does not support direct database testing, though some validation can be done using custom functions. 2. Reporting Features: The reporting capabilities are somewhat limited and could be improved. 3. Performance Issues: Some users have reported slower execution times and non-functional cloud devices. 4. End-to-End Testing Complexity: While possible, some users find end-to-end testing to be challenging. 5. Salesforce Integration: There is a need for improved integration features with Salesforce. 6. Ticket Tracking: Improvements could be made in how user-raised tickets are tracked. 7. Desktop Application Automation: Testsigma does not currently support the automation of desktop applications. 8. Element Inspection Limitations: Some elements cannot be inspected directly, requiring workarounds like Sikuli for interaction. 9. Occasional Errors: Users have encountered intermittent errors, sometimes due to platform maintenance or upgrades. 10. Lack of Transparency: There is a need for better communication regarding maintenance and updates that may affect test performance. | N/A |
Pricing Overview: Testsigma vs. Flank
Testsigma Pricing Description
Testsigma is an AI-driven, unified test automation platform offering tiered pricing models suitable for various team sizes and testing requirements. Their model is divided into three main tiers:
- Free Plan: This plan provides basic testing capabilities, ideal for smaller projects or individuals just starting with automation.
- Pro Plan: Aimed at growing teams, this plan offers unlimited automated testing minutes, a wide range of device and browser combinations, parallel executions, and integration options with popular tools.
- Enterprise Plan: Designed for large organizations and Test Centers of Excellence (TCOEs), this plan includes all Pro features plus advanced security measures, unlimited storage, custom data retention policies, and dedicated support.
Both the Pro and Enterprise plans are customizable, requiring potential customers to contact Testsigma for a personalized quote, indicative of a bespoke pricing strategy based on the client’s specific needs.
Flank Pricing Description
Flank is presented as a free open-source software. It does not have a structured pricing model or tiered plans. Being open-source, it is accessible to anyone and can be modified or extended by the community. Flank relies on community support and contributions for improvements and feature developments.
Comparison of Pricing Models
When comparing the pricing models of Testsigma and Flank, several key differences and commonalities emerge:
Common Points:
- Accessibility: Both platforms offer a level of free access. Testsigma provides a Free plan with limited features, while Flank is entirely open-source and free for all users.
- Support for Automation: Each product supports test automation, catering to the needs of software development teams focused on quality assurance.
Key Differences:
- Pricing Structure: Testsigma employs a tiered pricing strategy with increasingly advanced features and support at each level. Flank, on the other hand, as an open-source tool, does not have a pricing model and is maintained by the community.
- Customization and Support: Testsigma offers personalized pricing and dedicated support, especially at the Enterprise level. Flank, being community-driven, would have more generalized support through forums and community channels.
- Feature Set and Limitations: Testsigma’s paid tiers provide extensive features without limitations on testing minutes or storage, while Flank’s capabilities would depend on the community’s contributions and the user’s ability to implement and manage the tool.
- Enterprise Readiness: Testsigma’s Enterprise plan is explicitly designed for large-scale operations with additional security and support, which may not be directly available with Flank without significant customization.
In summary, Testsigma’s pricing model is designed to cater to a range of professional needs from small to large enterprise operations, with a focus on customization and dedicated support. Flank, being free and open-source, offers a community-driven alternative that may appeal to those with the technical know-how to leverage open-source software but does not provide structured support or advanced features out of the box. Users should consider their project size, need for support, and budget when choosing between these two options.
