Testsigma vs Accelq

Testsigma vs Accelq

5 February 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In the dynamic landscape of test automation, Testsigma and Accelq emerge as robust contenders. Testsigma distinguishes itself with its low-code, AI-driven approach and a versatile free plan, catering to web, Android, and iOS platforms with features like physical device testing and test recording.

Alternatively, Accelq delivers a no-code, AI-powered automation platform, emphasizing efficiency and end-to-end business assurance, albeit without a free plan. Both offer cloud and on-premise options and excel in ease-of-use, but Testsigma extends its accessibility to non-technical users through natural language processing for test creation.

Latest update: 1/31/2024, 5:18:29 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.

Feature comparison of Testsigma and Accelq

Free Plan
On Premise
Device Farm
Test RecorderN/A
Physical Device TestingN/A
No Code
Uses Ai
Generates Reports
Uses Computer VisionN/A
Ease Of Usevery easy to learnvery easy to learn
Is Open Source
Support Included
Review Pros 1. Rapid Test Automation: Users can automate most test cases quickly without needing expertise in specific languages or frameworks.
2. Customer Support: The support team is highly responsive and easily accessible directly through the platform.
3. Ease of Use: The platform is user-friendly, requiring minimal training to handle.
4. Test Step Grouping: This feature streamlines the development of new scripts by grouping test steps.
5. No-Script Automation: Offers a codeless approach to test automation, making it accessible to non-technical users.
6. Integration Capabilities: Testsigma allows for seamless integration with various tools, enhancing the automation suite.
7. Natural Language Processing (NLP): Testsigma uses NLP for test cases, making it intuitive to write tests in plain English.
8. Accessibility: It caters to users with non-technical backgrounds, allowing them to learn and use the platform effectively.
9. End-to-End Testing: It supports comprehensive testing, including validation of OTPs via Email and SMS.
10. Custom Functionality: Users can import custom code to extend functionality when required actions are not available.
1. Efficiency and Speed: ACCELQ offers a streamlined testing process that enhances overall efficiency and speed.
2. Self-Healing Capabilities: The tool has self-healing features that help maintain test accuracy over time.
3. Improved Test Coverage: Users report that ACCELQ helps in achieving more comprehensive test coverage.
4. Object Repository: A centralized object repository aids in better test management and reusability.
5. Defined Framework: ACCELQ comes with a predefined framework that reduces setup time and effort.
6. Logging Features: Detailed logging capabilities are available for better tracking and debugging of tests.
7. Defined Methods: The tool provides predefined methods that can be used to streamline test creation.
8. Salesforce Automation: It is particularly strong in automating tests for Salesforce applications.
9. Easy Maintenance: Maintenance of tests is easier due to the tool’s design and features.
10. Accelerated Development: Advanced AI capabilities in ACCELQ support faster development of test cases.
Review Cons 1. Limited Database Testing: Currently, Testsigma does not support direct database testing, though some validation can be done using custom functions.
2. Reporting Features: The reporting capabilities are somewhat limited and could be improved.
3. Performance Issues: Some users have reported slower execution times and non-functional cloud devices.
4. End-to-End Testing Complexity: While possible, some users find end-to-end testing to be challenging.
5. Salesforce Integration: There is a need for improved integration features with Salesforce.
6. Ticket Tracking: Improvements could be made in how user-raised tickets are tracked.
7. Desktop Application Automation: Testsigma does not currently support the automation of desktop applications.
8. Element Inspection Limitations: Some elements cannot be inspected directly, requiring workarounds like Sikuli for interaction.
9. Occasional Errors: Users have encountered intermittent errors, sometimes due to platform maintenance or upgrades.
10. Lack of Transparency: There is a need for better communication regarding maintenance and updates that may affect test performance.
1. Java Integration: The need for an in-built editor for Java integrations to custom methods is an area for improvement.
2. Desktop UI Issues: Some users encounter issues with the Desktop UI, although alternatives like CLI are available.
3. Grid Filters: There is a need for enhancements in Grid Filters to support custom and diverse filter items.
4. Data Warehouse Integration: For those dealing with heterogeneous data sources, there may be challenges without a centralized data warehouse.
5. ETL Testing Limitations: While ACCELQ simplifies ETL testing, there may be complexities when dealing with varied data transformations and compliance standards.
6. Learning Curve: New users might experience a learning curve due to the advanced features and AI capabilities.
7. Cost: The pricing model may be a consideration for smaller teams or individual users.
8. Limited Language Support: Users who prefer programming languages other than Java may find limited support.
9. Customization Limits: Some users may require more customization options than what is currently available.
10. Documentation and Support: While not always the case, some users might seek more comprehensive documentation and support for complex scenarios.

Overview of Pricing Models: Testsigma and ACCELQ

Testsigma Pricing Description

Testsigma’s pricing structure is crafted to accommodate various team sizes and testing complexities. It offers three main tiers:

  1. Free Plan: Best suited for small projects, offering limited testing capabilities.
  2. Pro Plan: Aimed at fast-growing teams, featuring unlimited automated testing minutes, diverse device and browser options, and integration with popular tools.
  3. Enterprise Plan: Tailored for large teams and TCOEs, providing advanced security, unlimited storage, and custom data retention.

Both Pro and Enterprise plans are quote-based, implying a customized pricing model for clients. Testsigma promotes direct engagement with their sales team for precise pricing information and tailored solutions.

ACCELQ Pricing Description

ACCELQ presents a versatile approach with its pricing model, designed to meet a wide range of test automation needs. The plans include:

  1. Trial Options: Available for web, mobile, API, and manual testing platforms, with features like no-code logic and self-healing capabilities.
  2. Enterprise Plan: Customizable for larger organizations, offering single sign-on, shared agents, and extended storage limits.
  3. Manual Testing Plans: Individual and team plans with a permanent free option.

All plans come with standard support and operational features, such as backup and recovery. Enterprise-level pricing requires consultation for detailed quotes.

Comparison of Pricing Models

When comparing the pricing models of Testsigma and ACCELQ, several common points and differences emerge:

Common Points:

  • Customizable Enterprise Plans: Both Testsigma and ACCELQ offer Enterprise plans that are customizable and require direct contact for pricing, indicating a tailored approach for larger businesses.
  • Free Options: Each platform provides a free tier; Testsigma offers a Free plan with basic testing capabilities, while ACCELQ presents a free-for-life manual testing plan.
  • Support and Integration: Both platforms include support features and integration capabilities in their paid plans, though specifics may vary.


  • Plan Structure: Testsigma simplifies its offerings into three clear tiers, whereas ACCELQ provides a broader range of plans catering to different testing types (web, mobile, API).
  • Trial Availability: ACCELQ explicitly mentions trial options for its various plans, while Testsigma does not explicitly offer trial periods for its Pro and Enterprise plans.
  • Pricing Transparency: Testsigma requires interested parties to contact their sales team for any pricing details, while ACCELQ provides more upfront information about its free options and suggests contacting for Enterprise plan details.
  • Target Audience: Testsigma’s model seems more streamlined for growing and large teams, focusing on automated testing, while ACCELQ addresses a wider audience with specific plans for web, mobile, and API testing, as well as manual testing needs.

In summary, Testsigma and ACCELQ both offer flexible, scalable pricing models designed to cater to the needs of different organizational sizes and testing requirements. However, the way they structure their plans and the transparency of pricing details differ, with Testsigma leaning towards a more tiered approach and ACCELQ providing a broader spectrum of specialized plans.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from!