testRigor vs TimeMachine

testRigor vs TimeMachine

1 February 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In the dynamic realm of test automation, testRigor and TimeMachine emerge as distinct solutions tailored to diverse needs. testRigor stands out with its AI-driven, no-code approach, enabling tests in plain English, ideal for teams seeking simplicity across web and mobile platforms.

Conversely, TimeMachine caters to Android developers with a technical bent, leveraging virtualization for application state management. While both offer report generation, testRigor’s broader platform support and ease of use contrast with TimeMachine’s specialized Android focus and open-source nature. Understand your project’s requirements to choose the right tool for efficient testing.

Latest update: 1/31/2024, 3:45:26 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.

Feature comparison of testRigor and TimeMachine

Free Plan
On Premise
Device Farm
Generates Reports
Uses Computer VisionN/A
No Code
Uses Ai
Ease Of Usevery easy to learnrequires expert technical knowledge
Is Open Source
Support Included
Review Pros 1. Allows writing and generating test scripts using plain English statements.
2. Offers integration with various tools such as JIRA and TestRail.
3. Capable of running tests on multiple browsers and devices simultaneously.
4. Features automatic test script generation, saving time and effort.
5. Provides efficient customer support, ensuring ease of use and implementation.
6. Eliminates the need for learning different programming languages or testing frameworks.
7. Enables the entire team to write end-to-end UI tests quickly without programming knowledge.
8. Generates human-readable test scripts that are easily understandable by anyone.
9. Automates test cases in a very short span of time.
10. Serves as a scalable solution for building a software testing process in non-software companies.
Review Cons 1. The tool has been reported to crash occasionally, leading to more test case failures.
2. The cost of server resources may be a concern for some users.
3. Lacks educational materials to help improve QA efficiency for companies with less experience.
4. Some users have experienced issues with server responsiveness.
5. Initial challenges may be faced by companies with a limited QA team and lack of software testing knowledge.

Pricing Model Comparison: testRigor vs. TimeMachine

testRigor Pricing Overview

testRigor offers a tiered pricing structure to cater to a variety of user needs:

  • Free Plan: Suited for open-source projects, it allows unlimited users, cases, and suites with public visibility of tests and results.
  • Private Plan: Priced at $900 per month, this plan offers private tests and the option to add additional parallelizations for faster execution, along with a 14-day trial period.
  • Enterprise Plan: Aimed at larger organizations, this plan provides custom pricing and includes a dedicated manager, Slack support, and possible on-premise deployment.

All plans by testRigor feature unlimited users and test cases, emphasizing scalability and flexibility for different testing requirements.

TimeMachine Pricing Overview

TimeMachine is positioned differently in the market:

  • Free Plan: It is entirely free and open-source software, which implies no direct cost for its use.

Comparing the Pricing Models

When evaluating the pricing models of testRigor and TimeMachine, several key points and differences emerge:

Common Points:

  • Free Access: Both products offer a free tier, making them accessible to users who are either working on open-source projects or have minimal requirements that can be met without financial investment.
  • Unlimited Users: testRigor and TimeMachine allow an unlimited number of users to collaborate, fostering team-oriented development and testing environments.

Key Differences:

  • Privacy and Advanced Features: testRigor’s Private and Enterprise plans offer private tests, which is a significant differentiator from TimeMachine’s open-source approach where privacy may not be as robust.
  • Support Structure: testRigor provides dedicated support and potentially a dedicated manager in its Enterprise plan, contrasting with TimeMachine’s community-based support that is typical of free, open-source software.
  • Customization and Deployment: The Enterprise plan of testRigor suggests a level of customization, including potential on-premise deployment, which is not explicitly offered by TimeMachine.
  • Pricing Structure: TimeMachine maintains a simple, cost-free model, whereas testRigor employs a tiered pricing strategy to accommodate varying levels of need, with the Private plan starting at $900 per month and custom pricing for the Enterprise tier.
  • Trial Period: testRigor offers a 14-day trial for its Private plan, providing an opportunity for users to evaluate the tool before committing financially. TimeMachine, being free, does not require a trial period.


The pricing models of testRigor and TimeMachine represent two different approaches to market segmentation. testRigor’s tiered model is designed to scale with the size and privacy needs of the project, providing a path from free public testing to private, enterprise-level solutions with dedicated support. In contrast, TimeMachine offers a straightforward, cost-free solution, emphasizing open-source availability and community support, which may appeal to users with less emphasis on private testing and enterprise features. Understanding these differences is crucial for users to select the tool that best fits their financial constraints and project requirements.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from.