testRigor vs Autify

testRigor vs Autify

1 February 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In the evolving landscape of test automation, testRigor and Autify emerge as leading AI-powered, no-code solutions for QA teams. testRigor stands out with its ability to write tests in plain English, compatibility with various testing types, and comprehensive integration with device farms.


On the other hand, Autify excels with its AI-driven maintenance and cross-browser/device testing capabilities. While both tools prioritize ease of use and support multiple platforms, testRigor offers a free plan and on-premise deployment, contrasting Autify’s trial-based approach and lack of a device farm feature. Choose wisely to optimize your QA testing process.


Latest update: 1/31/2024, 3:45:26 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.


Feature comparison of testRigor and Autify

FeaturetestRigorAutify
Free Plan
On PremiseN/A
Device Farm
Scheduler
Generates ReportsN/A
Uses Computer VisionN/AN/A
No Code
Uses Ai
Platformsweb,Android,iOSweb,Android,iOS
Ease Of Usevery easy to learnvery easy to learn
Is Open Source
Support Included
Review Pros 1. Allows writing and generating test scripts using plain English statements.
2. Offers integration with various tools such as JIRA and TestRail.
3. Capable of running tests on multiple browsers and devices simultaneously.
4. Features automatic test script generation, saving time and effort.
5. Provides efficient customer support, ensuring ease of use and implementation.
6. Eliminates the need for learning different programming languages or testing frameworks.
7. Enables the entire team to write end-to-end UI tests quickly without programming knowledge.
8. Generates human-readable test scripts that are easily understandable by anyone.
9. Automates test cases in a very short span of time.
10. Serves as a scalable solution for building a software testing process in non-software companies.
1. No Coding Required: Autify allows users to create and execute test cases without any programming knowledge, thanks to its no-code, visual test editor.
2. Time and Resource Efficiency: The platform’s no-code approach saves time and resources, allowing for quick design and implementation of test scenarios.
3. AI-Powered Maintenance: Autify uses AI to maintain and automatically update test scenarios, reducing the risk of human error.
4. Facilitates Agile Methodologies: Teams using Autify can complete sprints more efficiently, as it aids in testing scenarios and highlights when a review is needed.
5. Quality Assurance with AI: Autify leverages AI for next-generation quality assurance testing.
6. Rapid Test Framework Creation: Users can set up their test automation framework quickly due to Autify’s user-friendly interface and support channels.
7. Test Recorder Feature: Autify’s test recorder simplifies the process of creating tests by recording user interactions.
8. Intuitive Review Process: When Autify detects anomalies, it prompts for a review, showing screenshots for easy comparison of expected and actual results.
9. Facilitates Continuous Testing: Autify can be integrated into release cycles for smoke-testing and can be triggered daily to ensure end-to-end test coverage.
10. Supports Complex Applications: Autify is capable of handling end-to-end testing between complex systems like a NextJS frontend and a Rails backend.
Review Cons 1. The tool has been reported to crash occasionally, leading to more test case failures.
2. The cost of server resources may be a concern for some users.
3. Lacks educational materials to help improve QA efficiency for companies with less experience.
4. Some users have experienced issues with server responsiveness.
5. Initial challenges may be faced by companies with a limited QA team and lack of software testing knowledge.
1. Limited Integrations: Autify’s integration options are limited, which could be expanded for better collaboration and workflow integration.
2. Learning Curve: Despite its no-code approach, users may still need to invest time to deeply understand how to fully leverage Autify’s features.
3. Lack of Self-Tutorial Videos: The absence of self-tutorial videos can make it challenging for new users to familiarize themselves with the platform.
4. Challenges with Complex Data: Users have found it difficult to manage complex data such as product pricing and discounts during CPQ automation.
5. Limited Customization for Metrics: There is a need for more control over customizing metrics to improve the customer experience.
6. Initial Test Setup Required: Despite its ease of use, users still need to set up the initial tests, which may be a minor inconvenience.
7. Potentially Overshadowed Manual Review: The AI’s prompt for reviews when anomalies are detected might lead to an over-reliance on the tool, potentially overshadowing manual quality assurance.
8. Possible Overfitting to Previous Test Executions: While AI matching element characteristics is helpful, it may sometimes overfit to previous test results, leading to less flexibility in adapting to new changes.
9. Limited Support for Certain Use-Cases: Some specific use-cases, especially those involving complex user interactions, may not be as easily automated with Autify.
10. Dependence on Platform Updates: Users are reliant on frequent updates from Autify to improve UI responsiveness and compatibility, which may not always align with their needs.


Pricing Model Comparison: testRigor vs. Autify

testRigor Pricing Overview

testRigor offers a tiered pricing structure:

  • Free Plan: Suitable for open-source projects, offering unlimited users, cases, and suites, but with public visibility.
  • Private Plan: Starts at $900/month, includes a 14-day trial, private tests, and additional parallelizations for purchase.
  • Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing, a dedicated manager, Slack support, and possible on-premise deployment.

All plans feature unlimited users and test cases, addressing various testing needs and organization sizes.

Autify Pricing Overview

Autify also has a tiered pricing model:

  • Starter Plan: $120/month or $99/month with annual billing, offering limited parallel test executions and tests per month.
  • Pro Plan: $550/month or $450/month with annual billing, includes unlimited tests and users.
  • Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing with additional feature add-ons.

Features like scenario recorder, scheduled test plans, and cloud testing are standard, with support and professional services varying by plan.

Comparison of Pricing Models

When comparing the pricing models of testRigor and Autify, several common points and differences stand out:

Commonalities:

  • Tiered Pricing: Both provide a free or starter tier, a mid-range option, and an enterprise solution with custom pricing.
  • Unlimited Users: Each service offers plans with unlimited user access, albeit at different pricing points.
  • Enterprise Customization: Both have an enterprise plan that is customizable to fit the needs of large organizations.
  • Trial Periods: testRigor and Autify offer trial periods, allowing users to test the services before committing to a paid plan.

Differences:

  • Pricing Transparency: Autify provides clear monthly and annual rates for their Starter and Pro plans, while testRigor only specifies the starting monthly rate for its Private plan.
  • Test Visibility: testRigor’s free plan requires public visibility of tests, whereas Autify’s starter plan does not mention such a requirement.
  • Parallel Test Executions: testRigor allows the purchase of additional parallelizations, while Autify includes parallel test executions as part of their plan features, subject to limitations based on the plan chosen.
  • Support: Autify offers varying levels of support and professional services based on the plan, including chat and onboarding, while testRigor mentions Slack support and a dedicated manager in its Enterprise plan.
  • Billing Options: Autify provides a choice between monthly and annual billing, with savings on the annual option, whereas testRigor does not explicitly mention such flexibility.

Conclusion

Readers should note that while both testRigor and Autify offer tiered models suitable for different organizational needs, key differences such as pricing transparency, test visibility, and support options can significantly influence the decision-making process. Autify’s distinct advantage in billing flexibility and clear delineation of features at different pricing points contrasts with testRigor’s strong offering for open-source projects and the ability to purchase additional resources as needed.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from.