Repeato vs Ranorex Studio

16 January 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In this article, we compare Repeato, a no-code, AI-powered mobile test automation tool with a focus on UI testing for iOS and Android, to Ranorex Studio, a comprehensive test automation suite for mobile, web, and desktop applications. While Repeato leverages machine learning and computer vision for fast execution and easy integration, Ranorex Studio offers detailed UI testing with support for various technologies.


Both tools facilitate no-code test creation and provide reporting features, but Repeato is more accessible for non-technical users, whereas Ranorex Studio caters to users with some technical background.


Latest update: 1/12/2024, 1:25:33 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.


Feature comparison of Repeato and Ranorex Studio

FeatureRepeatoRanorex Studio
Free Plan Available
On Premise Available
Device Farm AvailableN/AN/A
Scheduler Available
No Code
Uses Ai
Generates Reports
Uses Computer Vision
PlatformsAndroid,iOSweb,Android,iOS
Ease Of Usevery easy to learneasy to learn
Review Pros 1. Simple and intuitive interface
2. Easy setup process, no complex configurations needed
3. Accessibility for both developers and non-programmers
4. Supports various testing methods like clicks, drags and scripting
5. Exceptional stability, no crashes or driver issues
6. Regular updates with bug fixes and excellent customer support
7. Great for mobile app testing, with efficient script creation
8. Allows for hundreds of additional tests each day
9. User-friendly, with easy adaptation and no initial setup required
10. Recognizes elements using visual fingerprints for testing
11. Allows for reusability and easy maintenance of scripts
12. No prior training or complex coding skills needed
1. Ranorex Spy tool is effective for identifying and locating XPath, providing an edge over some other automation tools.
2. Enables creation of stable automation scripts that are less affected by updates compared to tools like Selenium.
3. Powerful tool that can cover almost all types of desktop applications.
4. Provides the flexibility to implement code using Ranorex API as well as within Ranorex Studio.
5. Offers support for automation of web and mobile applications in addition to desktop apps.
6. Ranorex can be cost-effective if the infrastructure and approach are optimized.
7. Features easy click and recording capabilities for actions of the tested application.
8. Provides a variety of free online training sessions for all experience levels and helpful support.
9. Facilitates the transition from manual to automated testing, potentially increasing test coverage and efficiency.
10. Simplifies test creation, especially for those with less programming knowledge, and supports cross-browser testing.
Review Cons 1. Some limitations for iOS applications when tapping on any system window outside of the app
2. Access to CI/CD tools is only available at the enterprise level
3. Occasional unknown errors while performing basic tasks, although they are quickly remedied in the next version.
1. Ranorex only supports C and is limited to Windows, lacking support for Mac OS.
2. Some users experience difficulties when recording actions on applications using multiple technologies.
3. Some users report receiving no tangible benefits from using Ranorex in certain scenarios.
4. The cost of Ranorex can be high, which may be a barrier for smaller teams or businesses.
5. Users have reported experiencing persistent bugs and issues within the system over the years.
6. Communication with support has been challenging for some users, with difficulties in resolving issues.
7. Sales representative turnover can lead to inconsistencies in customer service.
8. Reporting functionality in Ranorex is criticized for not scaling well with larger tests.
9. While Ranorex is flexible, some users feel that this flexibility is necessary to work around its shortcomings.
10. Compatibility with all desired technologies should be thoroughly tested, as some users have found limitations in Ranorex’s ability to interact with certain elements.


Comparing Pricing Models: Repeato vs. Ranorex Studio

Repeato Pricing Overview

Repeato offers a tiered pricing model with a Free plan for basic testing needs and two paid subscription levels – Basic at €70 per month per user, and Pro at €120 per month per user. These plans cater to individual users and small to large teams, providing unlimited testing minutes and support for Android and iOS platforms. An Enterprise plan is available for larger organizations, with custom pricing based on specific requirements. All plans include email support, while higher-tier plans offer additional advanced features and priority support. Repeato allows flexibility with the ability to upgrade, downgrade, or cancel at any time and may offer discounts for special categories such as NGOs and educational institutions.

Ranorex Studio Pricing Overview

Ranorex Studio’s pricing structure is built around license types rather than subscription tiers. It offers Studio, Enterprise, and Runtime licenses. The Studio license is a single-station license for test creation and execution, while the Enterprise license is a floating license that can be used on multiple machines. The Runtime license is also a floating license but is limited to test execution and requires at least one Studio or Enterprise license for test creation. Ranorex focuses on providing comprehensive support and features for web, desktop, and mobile testing, with an emphasis on return on investment. Pricing details are provided upon contacting their sales team.

Common Points and Key Differences

Both Repeato and Ranorex Studio offer solutions for automated testing across various platforms, including mobile devices. They provide a range of features to support different testing methodologies and cater to different user needs from individual developers to large enterprises.

Common Points:

  • Support for Android and iOS testing.
  • Email support included across different plans or licenses.
  • Designed to cater to a range of users, from individuals to large organizations.

Key Differences:

  • Pricing Structure: Repeato uses a monthly subscription model with specific pricing for each tier, while Ranorex employs a license-based approach, with prices available upon request.
  • Accessibility: Repeato’s Free plan allows users to start testing at no cost, which is not explicitly offered by Ranorex.
  • Flexibility: Repeato subscribers can change their plan or cancel at any time, which suggests a more flexible approach compared to Ranorex’s license model.
  • License Type: Ranorex’s licenses are either single-station or floating, with the latter providing flexibility in using the licenses across multiple machines. Repeato’s subscription model does not distinguish between machine-specific and floating usage.
  • Support and Features: While both offer email support, higher-tier plans with Repeato include priority support, and Ranorex emphasizes its comprehensive support services without specifying tiers.
  • Plan Customization: Repeato’s Enterprise plan allows for bespoke solutions, whereas Ranorex encourages direct contact for all pricing inquiries, which may imply a more tailored approach across all its offerings.

In summary, Repeato’s model is subscription-based with clear pricing for individuals and teams, offering a free entry point and flexible plan management. Ranorex, on the other hand, opts for a license-based model with a focus on return on investment and a tailored approach to pricing, catering to teams that require a robust testing infrastructure across multiple machines.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from.