Repeato vs Marathon

Repeato vs Marathon

18 January 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In the evolving landscape of mobile app testing, Repeato and Marathon emerge as prominent tools, yet cater to different user needs. Repeato excels in no-code, AI-driven UI testing with computer vision for both iOS and Android, offering a user-friendly experience without requiring coding skills.


On the other hand, Marathon focuses on test stability and performance for code-savvy users, with features like batching and device pools, requiring a Marathonfile for configurations. Both tools support cross-platform testing and report generation, but Repeato is more accessible to non-technical users, while Marathon offers advanced customization for technical users.


Latest update: 1/12/2024, 1:25:33 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.


Feature comparison of Repeato and Marathon

FeatureRepeatoMarathon
Free Plan Available
On Premise Available
Device Farm AvailableN/A
Scheduler Available
No Code
Uses AiN/A
Generates Reports
Uses Computer VisionN/A
PlatformsAndroid,iOSAndroid,iOS
Ease Of Usevery easy to learnrequires expert technical knowledge
Review Pros 1. Simple and intuitive interface
2. Easy setup process, no complex configurations needed
3. Accessibility for both developers and non-programmers
4. Supports various testing methods like clicks, drags and scripting
5. Exceptional stability, no crashes or driver issues
6. Regular updates with bug fixes and excellent customer support
7. Great for mobile app testing, with efficient script creation
8. Allows for hundreds of additional tests each day
9. User-friendly, with easy adaptation and no initial setup required
10. Recognizes elements using visual fingerprints for testing
11. Allows for reusability and easy maintenance of scripts
12. No prior training or complex coding skills needed
N/A
Review Cons 1. Some limitations for iOS applications when tapping on any system window outside of the app
2. Access to CI/CD tools is only available at the enterprise level
3. Occasional unknown errors while performing basic tasks, although they are quickly remedied in the next version.
N/A


Pricing Overview of Repeato and Marathon

Repeato’s Pricing Model

Repeato offers a tiered pricing structure designed to accommodate a range of users, from individuals to large enterprises:

  • Free Plan: Ideal for small projects or individuals starting out, offering unlimited Android and iOS tests, a variety of assertion and command options, and email support without any cost.
  • Basic Plan: At €70 per month per user, this plan includes everything in the Free Plan plus unlimited monthly testing minutes and additional advanced features.
  • Pro Plan: Priced at €120 per month per user, it builds upon the Basic Plan with even more features, such as priority support and advanced testing capabilities.
  • Enterprise Plan: This custom-priced plan is intended for larger organizations with specific needs, offering a bespoke solution.

All paid plans allow for flexibility with the ability to upgrade, downgrade, or cancel at any time. Discounts may be available for non-profits, educational institutions, and annual commitments.

Marathon’s Pricing Model

Marathon is positioned differently in the market:

  • Free Open Source Software: Marathon is completely free, being an open source solution. It does not have a tiered pricing structure or additional costs for advanced features.

Comparison of Pricing Models

When comparing the pricing models of Repeato and Marathon, several key differences and common points emerge:

Common Points:

  • Accessibility: Both platforms offer a solution that is accessible at no cost, ensuring that individuals or small projects can utilize their services.
  • Support for Android and iOS Tests: Each product provides the capability to run tests on both Android and iOS platforms, catering to a wide audience of mobile developers and testers.

Key Differences:

  • Pricing Structure: Repeato uses a tiered pricing model with a free plan and multiple paid plans that scale with the user’s needs, while Marathon is completely free as it is open source.
  • Support and Features: With Repeato, the level of support and the availability of advanced features increase with higher-tier plans. In contrast, Marathon being open source, may rely on community support and contributions for features and bug fixes.
  • Customization for Enterprises: Repeato offers a customizable Enterprise plan with pricing on request, which is suitable for large organizations with specific needs. Marathon does not have a tailored enterprise offering; however, being open source, it can potentially be customized by the enterprise’s own development team or external contributors.
  • Flexibility and Commitment: Repeato provides flexibility in subscriptions with options to upgrade, downgrade, or cancel, which may be subject to certain terms in the case of discounted rates for annual commitments. Marathon, on the other hand, does not have a subscription model, and therefore, no such commitments or adjustments are applicable.

In summary, Repeato’s model is designed for scalability with a clear path from free to premium services as a user’s needs grow, whereas Marathon offers a completely free, community-driven solution. Users should consider their long-term needs, support requirements, and budget when choosing between these two products.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from.