Leapwork vs UI Automator

Leapwork vs UI Automator

5 February 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In the evolving landscape of test automation, Leapwork and UI Automator stand out for their distinct capabilities. Leapwork is a no-code, AI-powered platform that streamlines test automation across web, Android, and iOS, making it accessible for various industries without coding expertise.

On the other hand, UI Automator is an Android-specific, open-source framework that requires coding knowledge, offering detailed scripting for UI testing through APIs. Understanding the differences between these tools is crucial for teams to choose the right solution for their automation needs.

Latest update: 1/9/2024, 5:35:10 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.

Feature comparison of Leapwork and UI Automator

FeatureLeapworkUI Automator
Free Plan
On Premise
Device Farm
No Code
Uses AiN/A
Generates Reports
Uses Computer Vision
Ease Of Usevery easy to learnrequires advanced technical knowledge
Is Open Source
Support Included
Review Pros – Comprehensive data storage abilities without being locked into a single solution.
– Excellent support with timely solutions upon request.
– Ease of use in creating subflows for reusable tasks, which benefits non-technical testers.
– Enables manual testers to create automation without extensive coding knowledge.
– GUI-based platform that is easy to learn with a supportive knowledge base.
– No technical prerequisites required for use.
– In-depth strategy editor that supports web, desktop, and API automation.
– Seamless integration of test cases involving both desktop and web applications.
– Video export feature of executed test cases for documentation and training.
– Excellent debugging functionality, including live video execution and video recording.
Review Cons – Minor user interface issues, such as watermarks not disappearing when typing.
– Lack of check-in control in the Platform version compared to the Enterprise version.
– Reporting features could be enhanced, such as email reports and dashboard improvements.
– Identifying some web elements can be counterintuitive and may require advanced knowledge.
– Mobile automation not built-in; reliance on third-party providers or tools is necessary.
– Test execution can be slow when using remote agents.
– Limited functionality for executing sub-flows compared to main flows.
– Data-driven test automation from Excel is not dynamic and could be improved.
– Limited Excel integration with only basic Read and Write blocks available.
– Still an on-premises tool; could benefit from being cloud-based with automated backups and disaster recovery.

Pricing Overview of Leapwork and UI Automator

Leapwork Pricing Description

Leapwork Test Automation presents a flexible pricing model tailored to meet the needs of diverse businesses and teams. They offer customizable pricing options, emphasizing that one size does not fit all when it comes to automation needs. Leapwork does not provide upfront pricing; instead, they encourage potential clients to engage in a conversation to discuss their specific needs. By reaching out to Leapwork, organizations can receive a personalized quote that aligns with their business objectives, team size, and the complexity of their automation tasks. This approach suggests a more premium, service-oriented pricing structure that takes into account the varying demands of different users.

UI Automator Pricing Description

UI Automator stands on the other end of the spectrum as it is a free, open-source software. This tool is readily available for anyone to download and use without any financial commitment. The open-source nature of UI Automator means that it is maintained by a community of developers, and users can contribute to its development. The lack of a price tag makes UI Automator an accessible option for individuals, small businesses, or any organization looking to implement automation without incurring additional software costs.

Comparison of the Pricing Models

Common Points

At first glance, it may seem that Leapwork and UI Automator have fundamentally different pricing models, with the former offering bespoke pricing and the latter being free. However, both models represent an approach to providing value to users: Leapwork through personalized service and UI Automator through community-driven development.

Key Differences

The primary difference between the two pricing models lies in their accessibility and cost structure:

  • Customization vs. Standardization: Leapwork’s pricing model is built around customization. Each quote is tailored to the specific needs of the client, suggesting a higher level of customer service and potential scalability for larger or more complex requirements. On the other hand, UI Automator offers a standardized, one-size-fits-all solution with no direct cost, reflecting its open-source nature.

  • Direct Costs: Leapwork operates on a quote-based pricing system, which implies that there will be a direct cost associated with using their service. This cost will vary depending on the client’s needs. In contrast, UI Automator is free to use, with no direct costs, making it a potentially more attractive option for cost-sensitive users.

  • Support and Maintenance: With Leapwork’s tailored approach, customers may expect dedicated support and regular updates as part of their pricing plan. UI Automator, while free, may rely on community support and contributions for maintenance and updates, which can be less predictable.

  • Barrier to Entry: The need to contact Leapwork for a quote introduces a barrier to entry for some users, as it requires a commitment of time and potentially negotiation. UI Automator’s free, open-source model offers immediate access with no barriers, which can be particularly appealing for those looking to quickly adopt an automation tool.


In summary, Leapwork’s pricing model is designed for businesses seeking a customizable solution with dedicated support, while UI Automator appeals to those looking for an accessible, cost-free tool. The choice between the two will largely depend on an organization’s budget, the complexity of their automation needs, and their preference for community support versus personalized service.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from!