Leapwork vs Playwright for Android

Leapwork vs Playwright for Android

5 February 2024 Stephan Petzl Leave a comment Tool comparisons

In the realm of automated testing for Android, two distinct contenders stand out: Leapwork and Playwright for Android. Leapwork offers a no-code, AI-enhanced platform, facilitating test creation across web and mobile with a visual approach, ideal for those without coding expertise.

Conversely, Playwright for Android is a more technical, open-source Node.js library requiring coding knowledge, aimed at web automation with experimental Android support. Choosing between the two hinges on your need for a codeless solution with broad platform support or a developer-focused tool with a nod to Android’s specificities.

Latest update: 1/9/2024, 5:35:10 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.

Feature comparison of Leapwork and Playwright for Android

FeatureLeapworkPlaywright for Android
Free Plan
On Premise
Device Farm
No Code
Uses Ai
Generates Reports
Uses Computer Vision
Ease Of Usevery easy to learnrequires advanced technical knowledge
Is Open Source
Support Included
Review Pros – Comprehensive data storage abilities without being locked into a single solution.
– Excellent support with timely solutions upon request.
– Ease of use in creating subflows for reusable tasks, which benefits non-technical testers.
– Enables manual testers to create automation without extensive coding knowledge.
– GUI-based platform that is easy to learn with a supportive knowledge base.
– No technical prerequisites required for use.
– In-depth strategy editor that supports web, desktop, and API automation.
– Seamless integration of test cases involving both desktop and web applications.
– Video export feature of executed test cases for documentation and training.
– Excellent debugging functionality, including live video execution and video recording.
Review Cons – Minor user interface issues, such as watermarks not disappearing when typing.
– Lack of check-in control in the Platform version compared to the Enterprise version.
– Reporting features could be enhanced, such as email reports and dashboard improvements.
– Identifying some web elements can be counterintuitive and may require advanced knowledge.
– Mobile automation not built-in; reliance on third-party providers or tools is necessary.
– Test execution can be slow when using remote agents.
– Limited functionality for executing sub-flows compared to main flows.
– Data-driven test automation from Excel is not dynamic and could be improved.
– Limited Excel integration with only basic Read and Write blocks available.
– Still an on-premises tool; could benefit from being cloud-based with automated backups and disaster recovery.

Leapwork vs. Playwright for Android: Pricing Model Comparison

Leapwork Pricing Overview

Leapwork Test Automation offers a customizable pricing model. The approach is tailored, requiring potential users to contact the company directly to discuss their specific needs. This bespoke pricing strategy is designed to cater to businesses of various sizes and diverse team requirements. Leapwork’s model is based on the principle that each organization’s needs are unique, and as such, they should receive a personalized quote that reflects their particular situation and objectives.

Playwright for Android Pricing Overview

Playwright for Android stands on the opposite end of the pricing spectrum, as it is a free open-source software. This means that there is no cost to download, use, or modify the software. It is available to individuals, businesses, and developers without any monetary barriers, promoting widespread adoption and community collaboration.

Comparing the Pricing Models

When looking at Leapwork and Playwright for Android, the key differences in their pricing models are immediately apparent. Below is a breakdown of the commonalities and contrasts:

Common Points:

  • Accessibility: Both Leapwork and Playwright for Android aim to be accessible to their target audiences. While Leapwork achieves this through customizable pricing, Playwright for Android does so by being free.
  • Business Orientation: Each pricing model is designed with business users in mind, though they cater to different segments. Leapwork targets organizations that require a tailored solution, whereas Playwright for Android appeals to those seeking cost-effective options.


  • Cost: The most striking difference is the cost. Leapwork operates on a quote-based pricing model, which can vary widely depending on the organization’s needs. In contrast, Playwright for Android is completely free, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious users.
  • Customization: Leapwork’s model offers customization in pricing, which suggests that the service itself may be more adaptable to specific business needs. Playwright for Android, being open-source, offers customization in the software’s functionality, as users can modify the source code to suit their requirements.
  • Support and Services: With Leapwork, the expectation is that the pricing includes a level of support and services commensurate with a paid product. On the other hand, while Playwright for Android might have community support, formal customer service and professional services may not be as readily available.
  • Commitment: Engaging with Leapwork likely involves a certain level of commitment from the organization, both financially and contractually. Playwright for Android requires no such commitment, allowing users to adopt or move away from the software as they see fit.


In summary, the pricing models of Leapwork and Playwright for Android cater to different market needs. Leapwork is ideal for businesses looking for a solution that is specifically tailored to their requirements and are willing to invest in a premium service. Conversely, Playwright for Android is suited for individuals or organizations looking for a no-cost solution that they can customize and adapt independently. Understanding these key differences allows prospective users to make an informed decision based on their budget, need for customization, and desired level of support.

Like this article? there’s more where that came from!