5 February 2024 Leave a comment Tool comparisons
In the fast-paced world of software testing, Leapwork and Autify emerge as cutting-edge, no-code automation platforms designed to streamline the QA process. Leapwork offers a visually intuitive experience with AI capabilities, without the need for coding expertise, and is praised for its ease of creating reusable components across web and mobile platforms.
On the other hand, Autify emphasizes AI-driven test maintenance and the ability to easily automate QA testing, also across multiple devices. Both platforms are not open-source and lack a free plan, but they excel in simplifying test automation for teams of all skill levels.
Latest update: 1/9/2024, 5:35:10 PM
We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information presented on our website. This includes prices, product specifications, and availability, which are subject to change. The reviews on this site are collected from g2.com and crozdesk.com and summarized by us.
Feature comparison of Leapwork and Autify
| Feature | Leapwork | Autify |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | – | – |
| On Premise | ✔ | N/A |
| Device Farm | – | – |
| Scheduler | ✔ | ✔ |
| No Code | ✔ | ✔ |
| Uses Ai | ✔ | ✔ |
| Generates Reports | ✔ | N/A |
| Uses Computer Vision | ✔ | N/A |
| Platforms | web,Android,iOS | web,Android,iOS |
| Ease Of Use | very easy to learn | very easy to learn |
| Is Open Source | – | – |
| Support Included | ✔ | ✔ |
| Review Pros |
– Comprehensive data storage abilities without being locked into a single solution. – Excellent support with timely solutions upon request. – Ease of use in creating subflows for reusable tasks, which benefits non-technical testers. – Enables manual testers to create automation without extensive coding knowledge. – GUI-based platform that is easy to learn with a supportive knowledge base. – No technical prerequisites required for use. – In-depth strategy editor that supports web, desktop, and API automation. – Seamless integration of test cases involving both desktop and web applications. – Video export feature of executed test cases for documentation and training. – Excellent debugging functionality, including live video execution and video recording. |
– No Coding Required: Autify allows users to create and execute test cases without any programming knowledge, thanks to its no-code, visual test editor. – Time and Resource Efficiency: The platform’s no-code approach saves time and resources, allowing for quick design and implementation of test scenarios. – AI-Powered Maintenance: Autify uses AI to maintain and automatically update test scenarios, reducing the risk of human error. – Facilitates Agile Methodologies: Teams using Autify can complete sprints more efficiently, as it aids in testing scenarios and highlights when a review is needed. – Quality Assurance with AI: Autify leverages AI for next-generation quality assurance testing. – Rapid Test Framework Creation: Users can set up their test automation framework quickly due to Autify’s user-friendly interface and support channels. – Test Recorder Feature: Autify’s test recorder simplifies the process of creating tests by recording user interactions. – Intuitive Review Process: When Autify detects anomalies, it prompts for a review, showing screenshots for easy comparison of expected and actual results. – Facilitates Continuous Testing: Autify can be integrated into release cycles for smoke-testing and can be triggered daily to ensure end-to-end test coverage. – Supports Complex Applications: Autify is capable of handling end-to-end testing between complex systems like a NextJS frontend and a Rails backend. |
| Review Cons |
– Minor user interface issues, such as watermarks not disappearing when typing. – Lack of check-in control in the Platform version compared to the Enterprise version. – Reporting features could be enhanced, such as email reports and dashboard improvements. – Identifying some web elements can be counterintuitive and may require advanced knowledge. – Mobile automation not built-in; reliance on third-party providers or tools is necessary. – Test execution can be slow when using remote agents. – Limited functionality for executing sub-flows compared to main flows. – Data-driven test automation from Excel is not dynamic and could be improved. – Limited Excel integration with only basic Read and Write blocks available. – Still an on-premises tool; could benefit from being cloud-based with automated backups and disaster recovery. |
– Limited Integrations: Autify’s integration options are limited, which could be expanded for better collaboration and workflow integration. – Learning Curve: Despite its no-code approach, users may still need to invest time to deeply understand how to fully leverage Autify’s features. – Lack of Self-Tutorial Videos: The absence of self-tutorial videos can make it challenging for new users to familiarize themselves with the platform. – Challenges with Complex Data: Users have found it difficult to manage complex data such as product pricing and discounts during CPQ automation. – Limited Customization for Metrics: There is a need for more control over customizing metrics to improve the customer experience. – Initial Test Setup Required: Despite its ease of use, users still need to set up the initial tests, which may be a minor inconvenience. – Potentially Overshadowed Manual Review: The AI’s prompt for reviews when anomalies are detected might lead to an over-reliance on the tool, potentially overshadowing manual quality assurance. – Possible Overfitting to Previous Test Executions: While AI matching element characteristics is helpful, it may sometimes overfit to previous test results, leading to less flexibility in adapting to new changes. – Limited Support for Certain Use-Cases: Some specific use-cases, especially those involving complex user interactions, may not be as easily automated with Autify. – Dependence on Platform Updates: Users are reliant on frequent updates from Autify to improve UI responsiveness and compatibility, which may not always align with their needs. |
Pricing Overview: Leapwork vs. Autify
Leapwork Test Automation Pricing
Leapwork takes a customized approach to pricing, focusing on creating personalized quotes for each business. The company recognizes that organizations have varying needs based on their size and the nature of their projects. As a result, Leapwork does not have fixed pricing tiers publicly available. Instead, it encourages potential clients to initiate contact for a discussion that will lead to a tailored pricing plan, ensuring alignment with the specific business objectives and team requirements.
Autify Pricing Model
In contrast, Autify provides a structured, tiered pricing system with transparent costs. Their model includes a Starter plan at $120 per month (or $99 per month with annual billing), a Pro plan at $550 per month (or $450 with annual billing), and an Enterprise plan with bespoke pricing. Autify’s plans vary by the number of parallel test executions, monthly tests, and user allowances, with the Pro plan offering unlimited tests and users. All plans come with a core set of features, and higher-tier plans include additional support and services.
Comparing the Pricing Models
When analyzing the pricing models of Leapwork and Autify, several key differences and commonalities emerge:
Customization vs. Standardization
- Leapwork: Emphasizes a customized pricing strategy where the cost is determined after understanding the client’s specific needs.
- Autify: Offers set pricing tiers that cater to different levels of usage and requirements, with clear costs and services outlined for each tier.
Transparency
- Leapwork: Lacks immediate pricing transparency as the details are provided post-consultation.
- Autify: Provides clear, upfront pricing information that allows potential users to understand costs without the need for initial contact.
Flexibility
- Leapwork: Highly flexible, as the pricing is adapted to the individual needs of each customer.
- Autify: Offers flexibility within the confines of its tiered plans, with the option for additional customization in the Enterprise plan.
Billing Options
- Leapwork: Does not specify billing options publicly, which are likely discussed during the quote-providing process.
- Autify: Offers both monthly and annual billing, with savings available for those who commit to an annual plan.
Feature Access and Limits
- Leapwork: The access to features and limits is assumed to be part of the tailored pricing plan, but specific details are not provided upfront.
- Autify: Clearly delineates which features and limits apply to each plan, with the higher-tier plans offering more extensive access and fewer restrictions.
In summary, Leapwork’s pricing model is designed for businesses seeking a personalized approach to test automation pricing, while Autify’s tiered structure caters to those who prefer standardized plans with the option for some customization at the Enterprise level. Potential users should consider their need for upfront pricing information, the level of customization they require, and the flexibility of plan features when choosing between these two products.